Channel
@globalcrypto_moment
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
890subscribers
+325 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004436469851 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @globalcrypto_moment |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 27 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/globalcrypto_moment |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 03:40 | 890 | -31 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 921 | -17 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:54 | 938 | -28 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 966 | +163 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 803 | +238 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 565 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
78 reactions across 2 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 48 | 61.5% | |
| 👎 | 24 | 30.8% | |
| 💩 | 3 | 3.85% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.28% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.28% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 1.28% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡ CODE 👉 4DVK63WXPXF5EEYJGNEGCKMQNQ — Go to Bonus page and copy paste above code to claim. ☑ Wager over 100usd past 3days ☑ Reward: Real Money (1x Rollover) 🌐 Anti Ban Link ✉ Global 📱 Twitter 📱 Whatsapp 📱 Facebook 📱 Instagram 🚫 Warning: Don't trust any ads on Telegram—they're not official
❤15👎10
⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡ CODE 👉 4XQ3TC7Q5CX34AEUHOUZ4JVSOQ — Go to Bonus page and copy paste above code to claim. ☑ Wager over 100usd past 3days ☑ Reward: Real Money (1x Rollover) 📱 Stay subscribed to this channel! More BIG BONUS CODES and exclusive rewards will be dropped later today. Don't miss the next one! 🌐 Anti Ban Link ✉ Global 📱 Twitter 📱 Whatsapp 📱 Facebook 📱 Instagram 🚫 Warning: Don't trust any ads o…
❤33👎14💩3🔥1🦄1😁1
On-Chain Signals 📊 Exchange reserves are reaching historical lows while long-term holders continue to lock away their supply. Bullish momentum building up or more patience needed? What do you think?
Bitcoin Isn't Just a Store of Value Anymore 🟧 The expansion of Bitcoin L2s and smart contract layers is bringing DeFi, Ordinals, and scalable payments directly to the BTC ecosystem, unlocking trillions in idle capital. 👇 Are you participating in the Bitcoin L2 ecosystem, or holding pure BTC?
📈 Key Level Watch: CME Futures Gap Traders are watching the latest CME Bitcoin futures gap closely. Historically, market liquidations and weekend price action tend to pull spot prices back to fill these gaps during high-volatility macro weeks. Are you playing the technical gap fill, or looking at broader multi-week structural support?
Macro drivers and steady institutional interest are holding Bitcoin in a crucial consolidation zone. When institutional capital builds a floor, the next breakout can be swift. Call to Action: Do you think we’ll see a new all-time high before the quarter ends? Vote 🚀 or 📉!
Ethereum Layer-2 scaling protocols maintain high daily active addresses, keeping network execution fees consistently low for dApp users.
Bitcoin network mining hash rates stay near peak levels, underscoring continued hardware investment and network security.
Total stablecoin circulating supply holds firm near historic highs, acting as a crucial liquidity reserve for crypto markets.
Crypto prediction platforms are recording heightened activity as participants track key policy and economic sentiment indicators.
Bitcoin miner hash rates stay resilient near peak levels, underscoring ongoing hardware investments in global network security.
Cross-chain liquidity bridges are improving security protocols to facilitate seamless cross-network asset transfers.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @globalcrypto_moment. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BCGame Engine station” (@globalcrypto_moment), 890 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/globalcrypto_moment.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.