Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for jeonso

Channel

jeonso

@glyfim

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

408subscribers

+22 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002366626847
TypeChannel
Username@glyfim
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/glyfim

Growth

3864083976 August 2026 — 386 subscribers7 August 2026 — 386 subscribers13 August 2026 — 392 subscribers21 August 2026 — 398 subscribers27 August 2026 — 404 subscribers3 September 2026 — 408 subscribers6 August 20263 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 28 days, net +22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 383–411 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 12:40408+4
27 Aug 2026, 12:14404+6
21 Aug 2026, 12:04398+6
13 Aug 2026, 17:48392+6
7 Aug 2026, 10:04386no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:03386first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

220 reactions across 16 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘9643.6%
5625.5%
custom 5195129747604007457135.91%
🌚125.45%
🍓94.09%
🥰94.09%
custom 546080326904974562883.64%
💋62.73%
custom 545885462520765708531.36%
custom 519768827680210589620.909%
🦄20.909%
custom 534365289497548921610.455%
🏆10.455%
💔10.455%
🙏10.455%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 220 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC105 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

лпшечки я вас очень прошу лайкните этот эдит с соми + оставьте приятный комментарий :3

🥰9🍓52💘2💋1custom 54608032690497456281

6 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC106 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

HI BARBIE <33🤩🤩💞💖

💘9custom 51951297476040074576custom 54608032690497456283🌚2💋1

6 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC100 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

голодные сестры

💘7custom 51951297476040074575🌚3💋1

6 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC95 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

владелица b&rudi отметила сом в сторис и оставила милый комм под видео с анонсом ;> rudi berry: my sisssss ilysm 💜😭

💘65💋2🍓1custom 51951297476040074571custom 54588546252076570851

6 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC91 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

у b&rudi, американского бренда уходовой и декоративной косметики, и glyf вышла коллаборация 🐱 founder jeon somi doing founder things

💘7custom 546080326904974562831🏆1💋1🦄1custom 51976882768021058961

5 Aug 2026, 13:12 UTC95 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#munchi core

🌚76💘2custom 53436528949754892161

5 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC96 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

💅🏻

💘105custom 51976882768021058961custom 54588546252076570851

5 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC85 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

QUUEEENNNSSSS 🤩

💘83custom 51951297476040074571

5 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC80 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

☁️: хочу, чтобы ты была растением 🧚🏻: зачемм??? ☁️: чтобы я забрала тебя домой и вырастила

💘75custom 54608032690497456281

5 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC78 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

☁️: я щас подумала.. бэлль, тебе бы подошло быть актрисой мюзиклов 🧚🏻: да? ты так думаешь? у тебя зоркий взгляд ☁️: я серьезно 🧚🏻: правда?~~ 🎤🎤🎤

8💘3

5 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC69 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🧚🏻: тебя же узнают улице, не так ли? ☁️: постоянно 🧚🏻: я так и думала. у тебя очень.. яркий, насыщенный образ ☁️: удивительно, как они это делают, даже когда я в маске, в шапке и в худи с капюшоном... 🧚🏻: когда человек так прячется, наоборот начинают присматриваться. вот поэтому я выбрала другой способ 🧚🏻: я не крашусь, не укладываю волосы.. немного... как бомж. хожу в свободной домашней одежде, ничего не прячу, про

💘74

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @glyfim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“jeonso” (@glyfim), 408 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/glyfim.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.