Channel
@gobbba
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
868subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001171077182 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gobbba |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gobbba |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 868 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 870 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 873 | -6 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 879 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 14:52 | 880 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:06 | 879 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 879 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
38 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 31.6% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 15.8% | |
| 💩 | 5 | 13.2% | |
| 🤮 | 4 | 10.5% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 7.89% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 7.89% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 5.26% | |
| custom 5258410369814118138 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 2.63% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Добрейшего дня ребята! Стрим запущен Раста пока не будет до след недели, почему? Устал от этой прекрасной игры, снимать видосы гуд, сыграть турик гуд, играть вайп на стриме пока тошнит, по этому играю в другие игры, тем кто поддерживает огромное спасибо! Те кто ждут раст надо подождать, вернусь с кайфом, а в середине сентября вас ждет куча контента и куча приколов! Щас гта и дальше разберемся
❤1💩1
Ну что Товарищи Игроманы, вот пришло уже время потестировать нашу разработку под названием 🖕"Тетрис онлайн"🖕 Все уже почти готова и пришло время тестов! Жду всех желающих 8.08.2026 в 20 00 На первый раз сделаем на 15к битву! Первые 2 победителя получат призы! А так будем каждую субботу устраивать битвы Все кто хочет принять участие, подписывайтесь на телегу t.me/ded_neon_tv !
А сейчас ближ дни, будут ВОВ + Тарков, хочу теперь показывать кайф контент от которого ккайфую Что касается раста, он будет и будет его много, но всему свое время🎮🎮 Всех обнял приподнял!
❤2🐳1
Всем добрейшего утра! Вообщем, закончился этот "Чудо эвент" смешенные чувства, как будто поел калла но с заправкой безупречно вкусного соуса: Выделю +: Классный состав команды, все отыграли достойно, не срались, кайфовали, рофлили, делали максимум, еще и почти вывозили всех и вся Был кайф со зрителями и для них делать качественный контент, рейды,пвп,рофлы, и т.д Выделяю минусы: Ужасное отношение к РУ ( хоть и эвент…
❤5
Я не знаю, но вчера это было просто нечто Наверное вчера был лучший день раста за последние пару месяцев, куча контента, спасибо пацанам каждый старается потеет Вообщем и вам спасибо что смотрите что поддерживаете !! Кто не видел советую посмотреть) ( выложу ) А щас запускаем и продолжаем смотреть как что у нас!
Ждете растик?)
❤3🤮2👍1custom 52584103698141181381
Если есть любители гарри потера https://www.twitch.tv/g0bbbella Заходите поддержать Лиду) А мы начнем в 22:00 GW 4 Стак мощный, душить будем всех
👎2
Братва сегодня без раста, делаем гта Потом летим ВОВ надо челендж делать и некст
🤮1
Так погнали растик летс гоу
Video message, posted without a caption
🤡3👎1💩1
Гта —> Растик Поехали ребята
💩2
Атмосферно
🔥6💯2❤1🤮1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @gobbba. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Семья Al’G0bbones” (@gobbba), 868 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gobbba.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.