10 measurements spanning 26 days, net +53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,063–8,138 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
1 Sept 2026, 21:05
8,125
+2
30 Aug 2026, 02:15
8,123
-4
27 Aug 2026, 07:25
8,127
-2
24 Aug 2026, 03:35
8,129
+22
20 Aug 2026, 11:05
8,107
+8
17 Aug 2026, 11:53
8,099
+11
14 Aug 2026, 00:07
8,088
+7
10 Aug 2026, 11:58
8,081
+7
7 Aug 2026, 07:33
8,074
+2
6 Aug 2026, 22:32
8,072
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 30 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
31.7%
avg views ÷ 8,125 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,570
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held
25 (30 April 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Views total
12,870
Reactions total
131
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
875 reactions across 25 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
543
62.1%
👍
270
30.9%
🔥
48
5.49%
👏
7
0.8%
😍
4
0.457%
🤝
3
0.343%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 875 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
دوستان سنیور گولنگ اگه به دنبال موقعیت جدید هستید این موقعیت رو هم اقدام کنید.
https://jobinja.ir/companies/hafhashtad/jobs/trjN/%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%AE%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%85-senior-golang-software-engineer-%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D9%87%D9%81-%D9%87%D8%B4%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%AF
@gocasts
محصول Delta رو از چند ماه پیش درخواست Early Access داده بودم. خیلی محصول متفاوت و فوقالعاده ای به نظر میاد.
این هفته ایمیل دانلودش رو دریافت کردم و تونستم نصبش کنم.
برای وقتایی فوقالعادهست که میخوای hands-on بمونی روی پروژه چون بهت اجازه میده یه pair programming باحال با ai داشته باشی. یه interface کاملا متفاوت بهت میده برای توسعه ai-assisted که روی پاسخ های llm میتونی کامنت بزاری و یا conversation رو به یه نقط…
کمتر از دو ماه دیگه تیمسازی ۳ ساله میشه.
چیزی که اختصاصی GoCasts هست. بیش از ۱۱۰ جلسه هفتگی راهنمایی و code-review به مدت زمان جمعی بیش از ۱۶۰ ساعت.
با همه نواقص GoCasts ادعا میکنم که تیمسازی شیوه خاص ما بوده که بچهها بیشتر و بهتر مفاهیم مختلف رو درک کنن. خودشون دست و پنجه نرم کنن با چالش های توسعه نرم افزار. قطعا نقص و کم و کاستی هم زیاد داشته و داره. اما درگیر کردن ذهن مخاطب هفته به هفته با چالش های ریز و درشت م…
گوگل امروز پستی منتشر کرده با این ادعا که Go برای توسعهی AI-assisted زبان ایدهآلیه.
نکات مهم مقاله و یه سری نکاتی که برای توسعه agentic میتونه مفید باشه رو در این پست میتونید بخونید.
🔗 https://gocasts.ir/why-go-is-an-ideal-language-for-ai-assisted-development/
Ai for Software
@aicasts_ir
Agentic Dev Circle Group
@agenticdevcircle
@gocasts
راننده کامیون محله مون روزی پنج-شیش میلیون پول تبلیغات میده که شاید یه بار ۲۰ تومنی گیرش بیاد، دوستش گفت این که قماره، اگه بار گیرت نیاد چی، کل تبلیغات ت سوخت میشه، ولی چاره ای نیست، اگه تبلیغ نکنه بار گیرش نمیاد... ولو اینکه در ماه چندین روز هم پول تبلیغاتش سوخت بشه. به هر حال اگه بخواد تو حرفهاش بمونه باید این هزینهای که بهش تحمیل شده رو بپردازه
حالا حکایت ما و ai هم همینه...
همه مون کلی خرج ریز و درشت تو زندگی…
با GPT Sol و Claude Fable که کار میکنی کلا خالی میشی از درون...
هر چقدر تلاش میکنی که بتونی به هر حال یه جای پروسه تاثیرگذار باشی که افتخار کنی به خودت تقریبا وجود نداره!
تجربههای ۲۰ دلاری ای که ما داریم شوخی ای بیش نیست و صرفا جهت مزه مزه کردن به کار میاد. اکانتهای ۱۰۰ دلاری به بالارو باید تجربه کرد که قدرت اصلی agentها در توسعه روزمره مشخص بشه.
هر چقدر تلاش میکنی که یه طوری پروژه رو از اول ساختار بدی که مسلط…
جلسه مشاوره و ریویو سه نفره: من و Claude و ChatGPT
تجربه مثبتی بود از اینکه ایجنت های Claude و ChatGPT رو همزمان استفاده کردم برای نقد سیستم.
مثل این میمونه دو تا مشاور سنیور رو به جلسه دعوت کنی و آزادانه و بیرحمانه بخوای ازشون سیستم ت رو نقد کنن.
اینطوری بود که یه ریویو مشترک رو مستقلا دادم هر دوتاشون انجام بدن و فایل گزارش ش رو بنویسن. بعد گزارش هر کدوم رو دادم اون یکی هم نقد کنه و با گزارش خودش مقایسه کنه. در نه…
بچه های ایرانیکارت، گمونم دیشب یه دیپلوی رفتید سر هر سفارش داره تا بی نهایت پیامک میفرسته!
ریورت کنید تا فاکتور پیامک سر به فلک نکشیده
تو ۱۲ ساعت گذشته برای من حداقل ۱۵۰ یا ۲۰۰ بار پیامک اومده
احتمالا تو گلوی broker گیر میکنه، ارسال پیامک رو ack نمیده برمیگرده تو صف...
نمیدونم چیه ولی هر چی هست چکش کنید لطفا
دسترسی مستقیم نداشتم گفتم اینجا پیام بذارم شاید دیده بشه
یه گروه زدم برای تبادل نظر و گفتگو در مورد ai agentها هم برای practiceهای توسعه agentic و هم مهندسی ai agentها در پروداکشن. دوست داشتید عضو بشید.
این مشخصات گروهه
Agentic Dev Circle
@agenticdevcircle
@gocasts
یکی از بچههای GoCasts پلتفرم آموزشی خودش رو راهاندازی کرده
تمایل داشتید دورههاش رو بررسی کنید و حمایت کنید.
https://learnpath.ir/
کانال تلگرامش
@learnpath_ir
کانال بله
https://ble.ir/learnpath_ir/-5397442306485142270/1777105806561
@gocasts
هوش مصنوعی گند زده به همه چیز
پیدا کردن مقاله فنی خوب از حفاری در معدن داره سختتر میشه
قبلا پیدا کردن مقالات فنی و تکنیکال ناب کار خیلی راحتتری بود.
به جرأت میتونم بگم اکثر مقالاتی که در مورد ایجنتهای هوش مصنوعی میبینم هیچ بار فنی ای نداره٬ صرفا یا داره تنظیم کردن یه ابزار رو نشون میده یا اینکه چطوری پرامپت بنویسی یا ورکفلو بسازی که فلان کارو بهتر انجام بده.
آدم حالش بد میشه از حجم زیاد این دسته از محتوا
چیزی که…
دیروز از ChatGPT و Claude پرسیدم بهم چندتا فریمورک توسعه وب معرفی کنه که برای توسعه agentic مناسب باشه و جالب بود که هر دوتاشون گزینه اولشون Ruby on Rails بود!
فریمورک Rails احتمالاً بهترین مصداق Convention over Configuration محسوب میشه. این قضیه برای Agent خیلی مهمه؛ چون به جای تصمیمگیری درباره معماری، بیشتر انرژیاش رو روی requirement میذاره.
کانونشنهای قوی Rails باعث میشه برای ابزارهای AI نسبتاً قابل پیشبینی …
👍22❤15
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @gocasts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Dr Ahmadian @drmjahmadian · 90,984 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
جادی | Jadi @jadivarlog · 102,441 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
ویکی تجربه - استخدام و بررسی شرکت ها @wiki_tajrobe · 83,468 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
Programmer Jokes @programmerjokes · 107,319 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
KhashayarTalks @khashayartalks · 77,665 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 August 2026
Programming & AI Tips 💡 @ProgrammingTip · 46,862 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 27 August 2026
برنامه نویسی | Programming @Azad_Developers · 38,277 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
کنکور ارشد کامپیوتر @Konkurcomputer · 50,687 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 August 2026
Bplus @podcastbplus · 97,223 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
مکتبخونه | Maktabkhooneh @maktabkhooneh · 34,529 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 3 September 2026
ApplyKite @ApplyIR2UK · 37,816 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
پیشنهادهایی برای #اپلای #applyabroad @safarnamee7 · 33,598 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
The Devs @thedevs · 32,217 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
جابویژن | Jobvision | استخدام | کاریابی @jobvision · 59,223 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Go Casts 🚀” (@gocasts), 8,125 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gocasts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.