Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for goldinsidde

Channel

goldinsidde

@goldinsidde

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,602subscribers

-256 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001337144755
TypeChannel
Username@goldinsidde
Created30 March 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/goldinsidde

Growth

17,60217,86317,732.56 August 2026 — 17,858 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,863 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,855 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,841 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,835 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,831 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,823 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,818 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,819 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,803 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,784 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,785 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,783 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,773 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,754 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,746 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,744 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,728 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,722 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,712 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,699 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,687 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,682 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,662 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,652 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,644 subscribers6 September 2026 — 17,629 subscribers9 September 2026 — 17,602 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 34 days, net -256. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,563–17,902 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 18:1517,602-27
6 Sept 2026, 07:1517,629-15
3 Sept 2026, 22:1917,644-8
2 Sept 2026, 16:2917,652-10
1 Sept 2026, 12:5517,662-20
31 Aug 2026, 13:4417,682-5
30 Aug 2026, 10:3317,687-12
29 Aug 2026, 11:4917,699-13
28 Aug 2026, 14:1317,712-10
27 Aug 2026, 15:3217,722-6
26 Aug 2026, 14:1417,728-16
25 Aug 2026, 15:2517,744-2
24 Aug 2026, 17:4717,746-8
22 Aug 2026, 23:0617,754-19
20 Aug 2026, 10:2517,773-10
19 Aug 2026, 09:1517,783-2
18 Aug 2026, 09:5517,785+1
17 Aug 2026, 12:4617,784-19
16 Aug 2026, 04:3717,803-16
14 Aug 2026, 14:3717,819first reading

Engagement

54 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.2%
avg views ÷ 17,602 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,490
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 54 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held54 (31 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total87,190
Reactions total8,747
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

14,396 reactions across 54 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8,36158.1%
🍓2,82919.7%
🕊1,63811.4%
💔8015.56%
😭7675.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,396 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 54 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @goldinsidde. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 54 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 14:43 UTC≈1,250 views89 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

кстати, если вы давно приглядывались что-то у меня заказать, то сейчас это можно сделать с подарками 🤩 на сайте и вк сделали промокод AUTUMN на 5% и стикерпак в подарок для первых 10 заказов от тысячи🌟 на осень я бы взяла: набор теплоту, кубарик с листьями дуба и набор сезоны а озон дал доп скидку на все наборы для скрапбукинга и стикербук «лесной». акция продлится до 08.09 🌟 берем! 🤩🤩

64🍓16💔9

2 Sept 2026, 11:46 UTC≈1,540 views299 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Photo

нарисовала новую визитку для своего магазинчика канцелярии 🌟🌟 чтобы её точно никто не выкидывал)) как вам?

199🍓67💔33

2 Sept 2026, 08:40 UTC≈1,770 views180 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

первый разворот в книжном дневнике, который мне не хотелось оформлять 🤩 потому что книга очень сложная, но и одна из лучших, что я читала в своей жизни «человек в поисках смысла» в.франкл ⭐

153💔17🕊10

1 Sept 2026, 16:10 UTC≈1,880 views252 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @zolotovntrPhoto

i’d rather die

😭17448🕊30

1 Sept 2026, 12:21 UTC≈2,320 views255 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

твоё первое напоминание осени 🤩 выбери её. выбери красивые конспекты на учебе и оформление обложек. выбери время дома за хобби. выбери связать носки и приготовить тыквенный латте и яблочный чай выбери находить плюсы 🤩🤩

208🕊34💔13

31 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC≈2,300 views380 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

какая у меня цель в жизни? ну..

274🕊62💔44

31 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC≈2,300 views274 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

собираю разворот в дневнике, выбрав рандомное количество деталей 🌟🌟 результат такой освежающий, напоминает первую прохладу осени или раннее утро 🌟🌟🌟

🍓15579🕊40

29 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC≈2,300 views229 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

пришло время пополнить коллекцию в чайном дневнике 🍵 сегодня минус вайб: чай не понравился, пакетики нормально не приклеились, разворот не оч вышел

😭13758💔34

28 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC≈2,590 views190 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

мы в тайнике с ульяной приступили к новому проекту!! начали разработку настольной игры по дневнику. пока что я пишу интересные промты для карточек. а ульяна как художественный преподаватель пишет креативные задания а это всего два раздела из 6, которые мы придумали для игры. работы предстоит много, но мы думаем выпустить её к новому году 🥹

141🍓33🕊16

26 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC≈2,640 views481 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

тот тип мужа, который vegetarian, read AND fight for human rights 😭

299🍓105😭77

26 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC≈2,740 views208 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

осознала, что так то я творческая, но только в пределах рабочего стола 🌟 задумала сделать свою жизнь более whimsical 🌟 1) купила всё для маникюра, теперь буду делать его себе сама. выбрала наклейки с яблоками и пуговками 🌟 теперь надо придумать, что дальше 🌟

159🍓45🕊4

25 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC≈2,890 views320 reactionsread 31 August 2026

я отказываюсь подводить итоги лета. байкотирую временные рамки, гонку у кого лучше и стереотипное лето

🍓197😭7053

Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @goldinsidde. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@goldinsidde edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
29 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

наташа икигай 🪷
@natashaikigai · 34,106
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 3 September 2026
всмысле Саша?
@nalunetelegram · 77,946
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 19 August 2026
Писанина
@pisyanina · 33,964
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 3 September 2026
Тепляндия ✨
@ttepllota · 79,378
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“goldinsidde” (@goldinsidde), 17,602 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/goldinsidde.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.