Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Alexflamas TRADING 🏆

Channel

Alexflamas TRADING 🏆

@goldteamtrading

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,202subscribers

-676 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001262044856
TypeChannel
Username@goldteamtrading
Description🏆 Bienvenido al grupo de Trading de Alexflamas. ✅Contenido educacional basado en la acción del precio y analisis institucional. ➡️ Contáctame aquí @alexflamas_fx
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/goldteamtrading

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

13,20213,87813,5407 August 2026 — 13,878 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,871 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,867 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,858 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,843 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,834 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,816 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,807 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,797 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,783 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,780 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,782 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,768 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,757 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,743 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,735 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,729 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,723 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,717 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,709 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,699 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,691 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,678 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,666 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,662 subscribers4 September 2026 — 13,654 subscribers6 September 2026 — 13,642 subscribers10 September 2026 — 13,629 subscribers12 September 2026 — 13,614 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,608 subscribers15 September 2026 — 13,598 subscribers17 September 2026 — 13,577 subscribers27 September 2026 — 13,518 subscribers5 October 2026 — 13,458 subscribers9 October 2026 — 13,430 subscribers13 October 2026 — 13,405 subscribers14 October 2026 — 13,400 subscribers15 October 2026 — 13,377 subscribers17 October 2026 — 13,365 subscribers17 October 2026 — 13,363 subscribers18 October 2026 — 13,353 subscribers19 October 2026 — 13,350 subscribers20 October 2026 — 13,348 subscribers22 October 2026 — 13,338 subscribers23 October 2026 — 13,331 subscribers24 October 2026 — 13,330 subscribers25 October 2026 — 13,319 subscribers26 October 2026 — 13,308 subscribers27 October 2026 — 13,296 subscribers28 October 2026 — 13,285 subscribers29 October 2026 — 13,280 subscribers30 October 2026 — 13,267 subscribers31 October 2026 — 13,260 subscribers1 November 2026 — 13,252 subscribers2 November 2026 — 13,234 subscribers3 November 2026 — 13,224 subscribers4 November 2026 — 13,214 subscribers5 November 2026 — 13,202 subscribers7 August 20265 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 90 days, net -676. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,101–13,979 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 23:1613,202-12
4 Nov 2026, 21:5613,214-10
3 Nov 2026, 20:4913,224-10
2 Nov 2026, 17:2513,234-18
1 Nov 2026, 15:3913,252-8
31 Oct 2026, 12:0713,260-7
30 Oct 2026, 08:5113,267-13
29 Oct 2026, 06:3013,280-5
28 Oct 2026, 07:4913,285-11
27 Oct 2026, 04:3713,296-12
26 Oct 2026, 08:0613,308-11
25 Oct 2026, 09:4613,319-11
24 Oct 2026, 10:1013,330-1
23 Oct 2026, 06:4913,331-7
22 Oct 2026, 06:4913,338-10
20 Oct 2026, 22:0413,348-2
19 Oct 2026, 19:0713,350-3
18 Oct 2026, 21:5413,353-10
17 Oct 2026, 22:0713,363-2
17 Oct 2026, 00:1713,365first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 4 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.92%
avg views ÷ 13,202 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,310
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 November 2026
Posts held21 (4 May 2026 – 1 November 2026)
Views total5,240
Reactions total73
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 18:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
456
Videos
7
Links
150

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

813 reactions across 21 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥37446.0%
❤31338.5%
👍374.55%
🏆293.57%
👏242.95%
🙏70.861%
💯60.738%
👀50.615%
🤝40.492%
🤩40.492%
😁30.369%
🍓20.246%
😈20.246%
😱10.123%
🥴10.123%
🫡10.123%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 813 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2026 to 1 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (25.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

1 Nov 2026, 16:34 UTC≈1,040 views10 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Poll

Pregunta sincera, que en la entrevista salió el tema 👀 ¿Sentís que el mercado va justo a por vuestro stop?

  1. Constantemente, parece que me ven32%
  2. A veces, en días concretos30%
  3. No, mi stop está donde tiene que estar21%
  4. Ya no sé dónde ponerlo 😅23%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🏆5👀3❤1🥴1

1 Nov 2026, 16:10 UTC≈1,100 views7 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥5❤1👏1

1 Nov 2026, 16:10 UTC≈1,100 views13 reactionsread 6 November 2026

¡Buenas, equipo! Seguramente habéis notado que estos meses he estado más desconectado de las redes. No ha sido casualidad: decidí encerrarme por completo, en modo lock-in, a aprender de trading. Muchas horas de pantalla, mucho estudio y muchas conversaciones con otros traders. Después de esta temporada creciendo y evolucionando como trader, toca volver a compartir con vosotros todo lo que he aprendido en Youtube y …

🔥8🏆4❤1

25 Oct 2026, 17:33 UTC≈2,000 views43 reactionsread 6 November 2026

¡Hola Traders! Hacía bastante tiempo que no subía nada nuevo al canal, pero hoy quería compartir con vosotros un vídeo sobre algo que creo que puede ayudar a muchos de los que estáis en este camino. La confianza en uno mismo es una de las partes más difíciles del trading. Dudar de tus decisiones, tener miedo a perder o empezar a cuestionarte todo después de una mala racha... creo que muchos sabemos perfectamente de …

❤30🔥8🤝4🏆1

28 Jun 2026, 17:05 UTC≈5,500 views48 reactionsread 6 November 2026

🚨 ¡Ya está subido el nuevo vídeo! En este vídeo analizo una de las estrategias de Day Trading con el mayor win rate: la famosa First Red Day. Creo que ha quedado muy interesante. 👀 🔥 LINK: https://youtu.be/9p5qHqLF4c4

🔥27❤17🏆4

28 Jun 2026, 16:47 UTC≈5,210 views27 reactionsread 6 November 2026

5 AÑOS DE BACKTEST con los RESULTADOS REALES

🔥18👍5🏆4

28 Jun 2026, 15:35 UTC≈5,000 views50 reactionsread 6 November 2026

¡Buenas equipo! 👋 He estado un poco desaparecido estas últimas semanas. Entre que estuve unos días bastante malo y que además he estado haciendo cambios de bróker, apenas he podido tradear con normalidad ni dedicar tiempo a grabar contenido. Pero he aprovechado ese tiempo para preparar algo que creo que os va a gustar muchísimo. 👀 Hoy, en menos de 2 horas, sale un vídeo nuevo al canal donde enseño una de las estra…

❤31🔥9👍6💯3😱1

21 May 2026, 16:06 UTC≈5,620 views56 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Las entradas y salidas de la sesión de hoy 💀 Mercado súper consolidado y aun así rascándole dinero a base de HARD scalping.

🔥28👍14❤6💯3😁3😈2

21 May 2026, 16:02 UTC≈4,850 views31 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Entre ayer y hoy he estado viendo vídeos y empapándome bastante sobre todo el tema de leer las órdenes a mercado y el Level 2. Cuanto más lo miro más me doy cuenta de que detrás hay muchísimo más de lo que parece. Entender cómo entran compradores/vendedores en tiempo real y cómo reaccionan las órdenes puede dar una ventaja muy interesante para el scalping. Soy SUPEEEER nuevo en esto, pero sinceramente creo que pued…

🔥18❤10👏3

21 May 2026, 15:57 UTC≈3,030 views23 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Hoy he estado probando algo bastante diferente a lo que suelo hacer habitualmente 👀 Primer día haciendo hard scalping leyendo el tape (ver en tiempo real cómo entran compradores y vendedores en el mercado) y sinceramente me ha sorprendido bastante para bien. Han sido MUCHÍSIMOS trades rápidos en cuestión de segundos/minutos, buscando movimientos pequeños pero con mucha agresividad. He estado sobre todo en $ATPC y $…

🔥11❤7🏆3👀2

19 May 2026, 13:50 UTC≈3,090 views7 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Poll

Y tú, ¿qué tal has empezado la semana?

  1. 🟢 Buen inicio, semana en verde38%
  2. 🔴 Semana empezando regular30%
  3. 💀 El mercado me ha dado una paliza hoy32%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤7

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @goldteamtrading. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Nov 2026, 16:34 UTCAnonymous Poll124 voters

Pregunta sincera, que en la entrevista salió el tema 👀 ¿Sentís que el mercado va justo a por vuestro stop?

  1. Constantemente, parece que me ven32%
  2. A veces, en días concretos30%
  3. No, mi stop está donde tiene que estar21%
  4. Ya no sé dónde ponerlo 😅23%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 May 2026, 13:50 UTCAnonymous Poll237 voters

Y tú, ¿qué tal has empezado la semana?

  1. 🟢 Buen inicio, semana en verde38%
  2. 🔴 Semana empezando regular30%
  3. 💀 El mercado me ha dado una paliza hoy32%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2026 to 1 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

TRADING LAB
@institucionaltradinglab · 25,396
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 September 2026
CAPITAL TRADING®
@CapitalTradingPE · 21,612
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 21 September 2026
It's Smart Money
@itssmartmoneystrategy · 19,480
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 2 October 2026
Alex Ruiz | Canal Oficial
@joinalexruiz · 34,945
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
🥇SEÑALES FOREX GRATIS | TradingForexSP✔️
@TradingForexSPE · 20,690
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 September 2026
Wealthy Trades
@wealthytradesacademy · 113,797
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Alexflamas TRADING 🏆” (@goldteamtrading), 13,202 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/goldteamtrading.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.