🏆 Bienvenido al grupo de Trading de Alexflamas.
✅Contenido educacional basado en la acción del precio y analisis institucional.
➡️ Contáctame aquí @alexflamas_fx
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
58 measurements spanning 90 days, net -676. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,101–13,979 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 23:16
13,202
-12
4 Nov 2026, 21:56
13,214
-10
3 Nov 2026, 20:49
13,224
-10
2 Nov 2026, 17:25
13,234
-18
1 Nov 2026, 15:39
13,252
-8
31 Oct 2026, 12:07
13,260
-7
30 Oct 2026, 08:51
13,267
-13
29 Oct 2026, 06:30
13,280
-5
28 Oct 2026, 07:49
13,285
-11
27 Oct 2026, 04:37
13,296
-12
26 Oct 2026, 08:06
13,308
-11
25 Oct 2026, 09:46
13,319
-11
24 Oct 2026, 10:10
13,330
-1
23 Oct 2026, 06:49
13,331
-7
22 Oct 2026, 06:49
13,338
-10
20 Oct 2026, 22:04
13,348
-2
19 Oct 2026, 19:07
13,350
-3
18 Oct 2026, 21:54
13,353
-10
17 Oct 2026, 22:07
13,363
-2
17 Oct 2026, 00:17
13,365
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 4 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.92%
avg views ÷ 13,202 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,310
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 November 2026
Posts held
21 (4 May 2026 – 1 November 2026)
Views total
5,240
Reactions total
73
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 18:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
456
Videos
7
Links
150
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
813 reactions across 21 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
374
46.0%
❤
313
38.5%
👍
37
4.55%
🏆
29
3.57%
👏
24
2.95%
🙏
7
0.861%
💯
6
0.738%
👀
5
0.615%
🤝
4
0.492%
🤩
4
0.492%
😁
3
0.369%
🍓
2
0.246%
😈
2
0.246%
😱
1
0.123%
🥴
1
0.123%
🫡
1
0.123%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 813 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2026 to 1 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (25.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Pregunta sincera, que en la entrevista salió el tema 👀
¿Sentís que el mercado va justo a por vuestro stop?
Constantemente, parece que me ven32%
A veces, en días concretos30%
No, mi stop está donde tiene que estar21%
Ya no sé dónde ponerlo 😅23%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
¡Buenas, equipo!
Seguramente habéis notado que estos meses he estado más desconectado de las redes. No ha sido casualidad: decidí encerrarme por completo, en modo lock-in, a aprender de trading. Muchas horas de pantalla, mucho estudio y muchas conversaciones con otros traders.
Después de esta temporada creciendo y evolucionando como trader, toca volver a compartir con vosotros todo lo que he aprendido en Youtube y …
¡Hola Traders!
Hacía bastante tiempo que no subía nada nuevo al canal, pero hoy quería compartir con vosotros un vídeo sobre algo que creo que puede ayudar a muchos de los que estáis en este camino.
La confianza en uno mismo es una de las partes más difíciles del trading. Dudar de tus decisiones, tener miedo a perder o empezar a cuestionarte todo después de una mala racha... creo que muchos sabemos perfectamente de …
🚨 ¡Ya está subido el nuevo vídeo!
En este vídeo analizo una de las estrategias de Day Trading con el mayor win rate: la famosa First Red Day.
Creo que ha quedado muy interesante. 👀
🔥 LINK: https://youtu.be/9p5qHqLF4c4
¡Buenas equipo! 👋
He estado un poco desaparecido estas últimas semanas.
Entre que estuve unos días bastante malo y que además he estado haciendo cambios de bróker, apenas he podido tradear con normalidad ni dedicar tiempo a grabar contenido.
Pero he aprovechado ese tiempo para preparar algo que creo que os va a gustar muchísimo. 👀
Hoy, en menos de 2 horas, sale un vídeo nuevo al canal donde enseño una de las estra…
Entre ayer y hoy he estado viendo vídeos y empapándome bastante sobre todo el tema de leer las órdenes a mercado y el Level 2.
Cuanto más lo miro más me doy cuenta de que detrás hay muchísimo más de lo que parece. Entender cómo entran compradores/vendedores en tiempo real y cómo reaccionan las órdenes puede dar una ventaja muy interesante para el scalping.
Soy SUPEEEER nuevo en esto, pero sinceramente creo que pued…
Hoy he estado probando algo bastante diferente a lo que suelo hacer habitualmente 👀
Primer día haciendo hard scalping leyendo el tape (ver en tiempo real cómo entran compradores y vendedores en el mercado) y sinceramente me ha sorprendido bastante para bien.
Han sido MUCHÍSIMOS trades rápidos en cuestión de segundos/minutos, buscando movimientos pequeños pero con mucha agresividad.
He estado sobre todo en $ATPC y $…
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤7
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @goldteamtrading. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Pregunta sincera, que en la entrevista salió el tema 👀
¿Sentís que el mercado va justo a por vuestro stop?
Constantemente, parece que me ven32%
A veces, en días concretos30%
No, mi stop está donde tiene que estar21%
Ya no sé dónde ponerlo 😅23%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2026 to 1 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
TRADING LAB @institucionaltradinglab · 25,396 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 September 2026
CAPITAL TRADING® @CapitalTradingPE · 21,612 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 21 September 2026
It's Smart Money @itssmartmoneystrategy · 19,480 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 2 October 2026
Alex Ruiz | Canal Oficial @joinalexruiz · 34,945 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
🥇SEÑALES FOREX GRATIS | TradingForexSP✔️ @TradingForexSPE · 20,690 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 September 2026
Wealthy Trades @wealthytradesacademy · 113,797 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Alexflamas TRADING 🏆” (@goldteamtrading), 13,202 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/goldteamtrading.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.