Channel
@goodbooksclub
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
254subscribers
+55 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002722746740 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @goodbooksclub |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 24 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/goodbooksclub |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 15:01 | 254 | +8 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 20:20 | 246 | +45 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 201 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:23 | 199 | no change |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:30 | 199 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
145 reactions across 9 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 89 | 61.4% | |
| 😍 | 16 | 11.0% | |
| custom 5370857707454617566 | 11 | 7.59% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 4.83% | |
| 💘 | 6 | 4.14% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 4.14% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 2.76% | |
| custom 5463330784288985835 | 3 | 2.07% | |
| custom 5370747206536029076 | 2 | 1.38% | |
| custom 5454238772315057374 | 1 | 0.69% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 145 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
отрывок из шоу Зои Яровицыной «Читатели» 📺✨ В выпуске Олеся Иванченко рассказывает о романе «Театр» Сомерсета Моэма — а мы его уже разбирали в нашем книжном клубе. Споров тогда было столько, что хватило бы ещё на пару встреч! Вообще, книги Моэма у нас всегда вызывают бурные дискуссии — ни одна встреча не проходит спокойно ♦️ Смотреть весь выпуск тут 💌
❤8😍2custom 53708577074546175662🥰1
вчера посидели во дворике Omate — пусть и небольшим составом, зато так душевно🫂 Пока погода балует, решили почаще вырываться из рутины посреди недели) Собираться вот так, по‑простому, и болтать на отвлечённые темы без спешки 🩷
❤12😁4custom 54633307842889858353🔥1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤11💘3
небольшие изменения в расписании: На 29 августа ничего не планируйте — жду вас на встрече по книге «Алиса в Стране чудес» Льюиса Кэрролла 🎩 🐇 Подготовили для вас интересный формат, скоро все расскажу 🏛️ Немного о книге: Льюис Кэрролл (он же математик и логик Чарльз Доджсон) спрятал в сказке парадоксы, логические ловушки и философские вопросы. Здесь абсурд становится инструментом размышления, язык — игрой, а странн…
❤4🥰3custom 53707472065360290762💘1custom 53708577074546175661custom 54542387723150573741
в мини‑отпуске брала с собой августовскую книгу 📖⛱️ И если честно, идет сложновато. Отвлекаюсь на описания собора, на второстепенных персонажей, теряю мысль, думаю о чем-то своем и снова возвращаюсь назад на пару страниц… 🥺 и это нормально, все-таки для пляжного чтива нужно брать что-то меньше в объеме и смысловой нагрузке :) Собрала для вас небольшую подборку, которая точно подойдет по атмосфере для пляжа и отпус…
❤10🔥3🥰2
кадры с нашего киновечера 🤩🤩 все фото можно посмотреть тут
❤14😍5custom 53708577074546175665
Друзья, взяла на себя инициативу и выбрала книгу без голосования — одну из величайших книг в мировой литературе! 📖✨ В этом месяце мы читаем бессмертный шедевр Виктора Гюго «Собор Парижской Богоматери». Нас ждут около 600 страниц полного погружения в атмосферу средневековой Франции. О чем книга? Это не просто знаменитая история любви и рокового стечения обстоятельств, сплетающая судьбы уличной танцовщицы Эсмеральды,…
❤10🔥3custom 53708577074546175663💘2
Ребята, спасибо всем за встречу! 🥰❤️🔥 Вы супер! ✨
❤10😍2
Врываюсь в обсуждение с Питерским культурным контентом 😂 Хотела поснимать книжные, но все лечу-бегу, накупила слишком много билетов, ничего не успеваю снимать особо 😅
❤10😍7
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @goodbooksclub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Книжный клуб «Хорошие книги» Краснодар” (@goodbooksclub), 254 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/goodbooksclub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.