Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Cos姬统战部(二代目)

Channel

Cos姬统战部(二代目)

@goodfind01

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,943subscribers

+907 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003526212693
TypeChannel
Username@goodfind01
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/goodfind01

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,0362,9432,489.56 August 2026 — 2,036 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,050 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,097 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,144 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,185 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,246 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,322 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,359 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,446 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,509 subscribers5 September 2026 — 2,626 subscribers10 September 2026 — 2,751 subscribers14 September 2026 — 2,824 subscribers18 September 2026 — 2,943 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net +907. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,900–3,079 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 01:422,943+119
14 Sept 2026, 06:002,824+73
10 Sept 2026, 18:002,751+125
5 Sept 2026, 15:592,626+117
1 Sept 2026, 12:162,509+63
29 Aug 2026, 07:342,446+87
26 Aug 2026, 06:042,359+37
23 Aug 2026, 09:062,322+76
20 Aug 2026, 04:172,246+61
16 Aug 2026, 17:342,185+41
13 Aug 2026, 00:142,144+47
10 Aug 2026, 04:112,097+47
7 Aug 2026, 05:092,050+14
6 Aug 2026, 15:372,036first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 32 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 05s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤125.0%
🐳125.0%
😱125.0%
🥰125.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC4 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

印度发生罕见谜团:莫尔比一口井中的水剧烈晃动,无人能解释原因 这一奇怪现象已经持续第五天,当地居民感到困惑,当局正在展开调查。

7 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC37 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

脱产宣传口母务员又一力作:星巴克美甲环卫工 这里是中国! 🤓

7 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC38 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

孙宇晨对王思聪当年的嘲讽仍然耿耿于怀 8月6日,孙宇晨在X上发帖,借福布斯富豪榜财富位次变化回应旧怨。他写道:“一代版本一代神……王健林当年也曾是版本之神……版本更迭最残酷之处,是身处巅峰的人总是最后察觉。” 帖文中还特别提到:“傲慢是最先被清算的资产”,并称自己“很难再有王思聪这种自信”。 这番表态被外界广泛解读为对2019年王思聪在朋友圈骂其“傻逼”的隔空回击。 起因:2019年6月,孙宇晨以456万美元拍下巴菲特慈善午餐,引爆舆论争议。 王思聪的反应:王思聪在朋友圈转发相关文章《孙宇晨巴菲特的餐桌上,全是“韭菜”》,并配文:“这不就是个傻逼”。 孙宇晨当时回怼:孙宇晨当时在微博晒出截图回怼,称王思聪“靠爹的还敢骂靠自己的,80后还敢骂90后,搞个直播就倒闭的敢骂还在创业的”。

7 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC51 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @BangDream0115Photo

引流狗快速融入指南

7 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC88 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

【Flower Dance】花之舞来啦 | 总会有人逆光而来,配得上你所有温柔 大家好,网传相关视频是他人盗用我的原视频AI恶意合成伪造的,并不是真实的。 我已经开始收集全部证据,会依法维权。 麻烦大家看到该伪造视频不要转发扩散,如果有相关链接、截图可以私信提供给我取证,十分感谢大家的关心和保护。感恩[黑眼圈_金箍]

❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @goodfind01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cos姬统战部(二代目)” (@goodfind01), 2,943 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/goodfind01.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.