Channel
@gorbachev_projects
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
792subscribers
+66 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001521052935 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gorbachev_projects |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gorbachev_projects |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:16 | 792 | -1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:00 | 793 | +40 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 753 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:28 | 754 | +5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 749 | +23 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 726 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 726 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
75 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 26 | 34.7% | |
| ❤ | 23 | 30.7% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 20.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 5.33% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.67% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 2.67% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 1.33% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.33% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 1.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#литературная_беседка И вновь работаем с интересными стратагемами Полиэна! Цель - расширение словарного, эрудиции. Моё мнение - вот такие короткие выдержки помогают понемногу вливаться в сложное чтение, посвященное пониманию более, чем развлечению. Зачем? Для того, чтобы оставаться сильным автором и спикером. Ибо в цене. ИИ тексты шиты белыми нитками и раздражают. Спикерство тоже претерпело упадок. Если вы будет…
❤1👏1🔥1
🤦 Посмотрите, что они со мной сделали. Да-да. С лицом всё нормально. Хотя... если честно, последние пару дней мне уже кажется, что не очень. 😂 В последнее время ловлю себя на мысли, что рынок стал каким-то одинаковым. Каждую неделю запуски, конференции и вебинары, но открываешь программу — а там всё те же темы, те же презентации и те же советы. И тут мне пишут: — Хотим пригласить вас спикером. Я уже почти автом…
🔥3👍2🥰2💯1
Posted without readable text
👍6🔥5❤3👏1
Posted without readable text
❤2❤🔥1
Posted without readable text
❤3🔥2✍1
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥8❤4👍3
Video message, posted without a caption
❤7🔥4👍3
Всем привет, друзья! Давайте знакомиться - так как нас стало больше 🌟🌟🌟
Подводила итоги июля - и вот о чем подумала. В 2026м работают: Системность. Регулярность. Последовательность. Мы пробуем разные площадки и форматы продвижения, отбираем лучшие и реплицируем то, что работает. А у вас есть система / стратегия коммуникаций? Можем составить на безоплатной услуге Геннадия Горбачева «Аудит модели продаж». Пишите для записи. А еще надо РАССЧИТЫВАТЬ СИЛЫ на стратегию!!! Мы это учитываем…
❤3🔥2👍1
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤🔥1
Доброго настроения! Алессандра, сейчас продвижение становиться очень агрессивным, как будто все поняли, что надо идти через смыслы, ценности.... Однако чувствуется, с ещё большим напором, давление и продажи, методами, которые иногда на грани..... Как удаётся создавать пространство, где продажа - это то, что выбирает эксперт, а ты просто озвучиваешь цену? Уровень доверие у тебя в чатах из 100, 100+
🙏1
Друзья, в ходе чемпионата спикеров я отвечала на вопросы участников. Ответы сделала максимально полезными и применимыми. Буду делиться по одному. За каждый аудио - айсберг опыта моих спикеров, учеников и экспертов. А также тренды рынка 2026. Поехххалиии!!! 👇 👇 👇
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @gorbachev_projects. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Речь, харизма, продажи” (@gorbachev_projects), 792 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gorbachev_projects.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.