Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 40 days, net -59. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,761–1,838 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 08:00
1,770
-4
12 Sept 2026, 09:00
1,774
-15
8 Sept 2026, 05:01
1,789
-11
2 Sept 2026, 19:09
1,800
-6
30 Aug 2026, 15:14
1,806
-5
27 Aug 2026, 06:37
1,811
-6
24 Aug 2026, 15:38
1,817
-4
20 Aug 2026, 17:05
1,821
+5
18 Aug 2026, 03:42
1,816
-2
14 Aug 2026, 23:17
1,818
-4
11 Aug 2026, 15:34
1,822
-6
8 Aug 2026, 06:23
1,828
-1
7 Aug 2026, 17:33
1,829
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:05
1,829
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 24s
Average length
28s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
54 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
19
35.2%
🔥
12
22.2%
🙏
11
20.4%
👍
10
18.5%
😍
2
3.70%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Хочу сказать вам СПАСИБО🙏
Тем, кто читает, пробует, делает.
Ведь я здесь не потому, что мне скучно, в потому что чувствую огромное удовольствие, наблюдая, как жизнь женщин меняется к лучшему.
❤️ Когда вы начинаете верить в себя, перестаете бояться и действуете
Нашла обалденную версию дневника эмоций на просторах интернета
Девушка вяжет, только вдумайтесь, ГОДОВОЙ ШАРФ НАСТРОЕНИЯ🔥
🧣 Каждый день она вяжет строчку определенного цвета.
Если день прошёл отлично, с положительными эмоциями, то берет оранжевые нитки.
Если грустно было – синие.
Если обычный, ровный день – серые.
Вы тоже можете выбрать свой способ вести такой дневник. Рисовать, вязать или взять классический шабл…
«Мне 30, а я до сих пор не знаю, кем хочу стать…»
«Хочу я жить с этим человеком или нет?»
«Переезжать или оставаться на старом месте?»
Столько вопросов в голове порой, в которых мы не можем принять решение.
А чтобы появилась уверенность, нужно вернуться к началу и СЛЫШАТЬ себя.
Самопознанию можно научиться. Это навык. Сначала сложно, страшно заглядывать в глубину своей души, а потом становится увлекательно.
С ч…
Можно верить в психосоматику, можно не верить, но надо понимать, что наш мозг не изучен даже на 5%. Мы не можем знать точно, как именно действует энергия наших эмоций.
А жизнь подтверждает – негатив не проходит бесследно. Стресс влияет на здоровье, это точно.
Поэтому я так много говорю про проживание эмоций, про отпускание обид и злости. Без этого жить становится намного легче!
А вы умеете распознавать и проживать …
Эта неделя была посвящена ЭМОЦИЯМ
Самое главное, что я хотела донести – пока вы не научитесь управлять эмоциями, эмоции будут управлять вами!
Даже если вы знаете про них все, важно практиковаться.
И такая возможность есть на моем практикуме «Антистресс»
🔥 замечать стресс до того, как он вас захватит
🔥 выходить из него без истерик и срывов
🔥 успокаивать нервную систему
Предзапись уже идёт.
Ничего не нужно оплачив…
✨ВСЁ ПРО ОБИДЫ✨
Собрала для вас самые интересные посты об этом непростом чувстве👇
✔️ Обида – что за чувство?
✔️ Последствия женских обид
✔️ Упражнение по предотвращению обид
✔️ Как обида влияет на красоту
✔️ Тест на скрытые обиды
✔️ Тест на обиды из прошлого
✔️ Сказка про обиду
❤️ Я вам пользу, а вы мне сердечко. Идёт?🙏😉
Твой 🥰😘😍😀😚 –
настоящий?
Или это просто шум в голове?
Страх защищает нас.
Чтобы мы не совали руки в огонь или не переходили дорогу на красный.
✔️Но это страх реальный, а есть его брат – придуманный страх.
Вы с ним сталкиваетесь, если думаете:
✔️ Вдруг у меня не получится?
✔️ Что обо мне подумают?
✔️ А если я ошибусь?
🛩 Что делать со страхом?
1. Назвать его.
2. Проверить реальность. Правда ли это вам так угрожа…
❤2👍1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @gorelovaelena. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Лайфхаки Подсознания @podsoznanie_lebedko · 20,733 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Елена Горелова | Психолог и коуч” (@gorelovaelena), 1,770 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gorelovaelena.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.