Channel
@gorillaz_overheard
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
109subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003665647390 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gorillaz_overheard |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gorillaz_overheard |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:59 | 109 | -1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 15:40 | 110 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 113 | +7 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 22:36 | 106 | +4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:30 | 102 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 102 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
115 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5339191209933962630 | 33 | 28.7% | |
| custom 5282763422792956377 | 16 | 13.9% | |
| custom 5231221195310920195 | 15 | 13.0% | |
| custom 5242571964945556489 | 9 | 7.83% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 7.83% | |
| 😍 | 9 | 7.83% | |
| custom 5395446601382664381 | 7 | 6.09% | |
| custom 5256192337033327122 | 6 | 5.22% | |
| 🤯 | 6 | 5.22% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 4.35% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ ✚⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ бляха мне стало интересно, влд гориллаз кф (2.6к подписчиков) самого не заебал рассольник? ну, просто он каждую минуту пишет какой нибудь тейк (ладно это хорошо) с тупым юмором еще угарно смотреть как его в комментах срут а он продолжает нести всякую херь. ну короче пока #take @Gorillaz_overheadbot ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ ✚⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
custom 53391912099339626305custom 52827634227929563773🤯1custom 52561923370333271221
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ ✚⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ Меня очень раздражает Рассольник из гориллаз кф, у него отвратительный и не смешной юмор Особенно расхуячило с этих постов почему его тейки вообще пропускают Осторожно секс и насилие https://t.me/gorillazconfes/13489 https://t.me/gorillazconfes/13573 #take @Gorillaz_overheadbot ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ ✚⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
custom 53391912099339626303👍2
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ ✚⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ всем пр, кто нибудь знает почему подслушка гортллаз руфд притихла? какая то причина есть для этого или просто забили на нее? #take @Gorillaz_overheadbot ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ ✚⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
custom 52425719649455564891
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ ✚⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ Впервые рисую баллончиками, теперь частичка Gorillaz есть у меня на даче #take @Gorillaz_overheadbot ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ ✚⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
custom 53391912099339626308😍3custom 52312211953109201952custom 52425719649455564892
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ ✚⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ https://t.me/GorillazSticker. меня очень заебал этот канал, там не стикеры кидают, а какой-то пиздец. #take @Gorillaz_overheadbot ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ ✚⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
👍5
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ ✚⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ Ребят, у меня есть вам пища для размышления чтоб не спать ночью и сидеть в лоре часами. Именно - Если вы видели, в том видео the mountain был момент когда 4 участников группы воссоединены. У Мёрдока змея, у 2Д руль, у Нудлы плащ (по теориям она как бы летать хотела?), а Расс без всего… Он самоубился? У меня несколько теорий - либо то что они держат в руках как бы их смерть, либо это как бы символы соб…
🤯5custom 52425719649455564892
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ ✚⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ Привет резко пришёл в голову вопрос: Как вы думаете, что бы делал Мёрдок если бы его болт сломался? (Перелом) Не спрашивайте с чего такие вопросы, но мне кажется для него это было бы катастрофой #take @Gorillaz_overheadbot ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ ✚⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
😍6custom 52561923370333271222
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ ✚⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ Как относитесь к взаимоотношениям мердок/нудл как отца и дочери? #take @Gorillaz_overheadbot ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ ✚⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
custom 52312211953109201951custom 53954466013826643811
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ ✚⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ Привет, я не понимаю почему в англ фандоме 2D иногда называют chewdee, поясните кто-нибудь пожалуйста 🙏🏿🙏🏿🙏🏿 #take @Gorillaz_overheadbot ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ ✚⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
custom 52312211953109201953custom 53391912099339626301
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ ✚⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ Привее, я не очень поняла, Туди небирнар или Джейми с Деймоном просто предположили что он может им быть? #take @Gorillaz_overheadbot ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ ✚⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ ✚⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ Я бы хотела спросить, как Русс ФД Горилл относится к Пауле Крекер? Просто сама я отношусь к ней нормально. #take @Gorillaz_overheadbot ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ ✚⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
custom 52312211953109201952
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ ✚⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ Привет, а я не понимаю прикола, как мердок смог создать киборг нудл если он даже школу не закончил и вроде как не получал дальнейшего образования в универе (возможно напутала но не видела инфы о том что он был студентом) Может в чем то другом дело? И вообще не понимаю считать его тупым или нет #take @Gorillaz_overheadbot ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ ✚⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
custom 53391912099339626304
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gorillaz_overheard. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝔾𝕠𝕣𝕚𝕝𝕝𝕒𝕫 𝕠𝕧𝕖𝕣𝕙𝕖𝕒𝕣𝕕 ˙๑” (@gorillaz_overheard), 109 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gorillaz_overheard.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.