Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for goth tears

Channel

goth tears

@gothtearsx

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

32,197subscribers

-86 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001628532162
TypeChannel
Username@gothtearsx
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live20 October 2026
Measurements held40
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 20 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/gothtearsx

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

29,67132,53831,104.510 August 2026 — 32,283 subscribers10 August 2026 — 32,283 subscribers11 August 2026 — 32,263 subscribers12 August 2026 — 32,214 subscribers13 August 2026 — 32,172 subscribers14 August 2026 — 32,110 subscribers16 August 2026 — 32,050 subscribers17 August 2026 — 31,995 subscribers18 August 2026 — 31,964 subscribers19 August 2026 — 31,916 subscribers20 August 2026 — 31,776 subscribers21 August 2026 — 31,710 subscribers23 August 2026 — 31,612 subscribers24 August 2026 — 31,505 subscribers25 August 2026 — 31,446 subscribers27 August 2026 — 31,392 subscribers28 August 2026 — 31,356 subscribers28 August 2026 — 31,307 subscribers30 August 2026 — 31,284 subscribers30 August 2026 — 31,216 subscribers31 August 2026 — 31,172 subscribers1 September 2026 — 31,136 subscribers2 September 2026 — 31,058 subscribers4 September 2026 — 30,983 subscribers7 September 2026 — 30,876 subscribers10 September 2026 — 30,727 subscribers12 September 2026 — 30,658 subscribers14 September 2026 — 30,572 subscribers15 September 2026 — 30,476 subscribers17 September 2026 — 30,403 subscribers28 September 2026 — 29,965 subscribers5 October 2026 — 29,671 subscribers9 October 2026 — 30,793 subscribers13 October 2026 — 32,538 subscribers14 October 2026 — 32,477 subscribers16 October 2026 — 32,383 subscribers17 October 2026 — 32,327 subscribers17 October 2026 — 32,275 subscribers19 October 2026 — 32,188 subscribers20 October 2026 — 32,197 subscribers32,19710 August 202620 October 2026
40 measurements spanning 70 days, net -86. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,241–32,968 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 40
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
20 Oct 2026, 01:4132,197+9
19 Oct 2026, 00:3832,188-87
17 Oct 2026, 22:3532,275-52
17 Oct 2026, 00:3932,327-56
16 Oct 2026, 00:1632,383-94
14 Oct 2026, 21:1932,477-61
13 Oct 2026, 15:2132,538+1,745
9 Oct 2026, 16:1730,793+1,122
5 Oct 2026, 06:3729,671-294
28 Sept 2026, 20:5629,965-438
17 Sept 2026, 23:1530,403-73
15 Sept 2026, 18:5930,476-96
14 Sept 2026, 05:1830,572-86
12 Sept 2026, 12:2030,658-69
10 Sept 2026, 09:1830,727-149
7 Sept 2026, 07:3730,876-107
4 Sept 2026, 11:3730,983-75
2 Sept 2026, 23:0331,058-78
1 Sept 2026, 18:1231,136-36
31 Aug 2026, 21:3331,172first reading

Engagement

156 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 126 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.1%
avg views ÷ 32,197 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,220
82 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
83
of 156 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 October 2026
Posts held156 (1 August 2026 – 19 October 2026)
Views total346,310
Reactions total4,439
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Oct 2026, 01:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
34s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

11,111 reactions across 155 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54339782218738997444,91244.2%
❤4,09136.8%
custom 52740483328539666418117.30%
👍4043.64%
custom 53146789897620833153032.73%
😭2151.94%
🔥1841.66%
💔1231.11%
🤓680.612%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 155 of the 156 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,111 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 156 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 19 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
206
across the posts below
Posts paid on
27
of 155 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gothtearsx. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 156 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 19 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Oct 2026, 11:26 UTC≈2,060 views64 reactionsread 20 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 543397822187389974452❤11👍1

Signed goth

18 Oct 2026, 12:23 UTC≈3,100 views49 reactionsread 20 October 2026
Photo

Террорлезвие под аутентичный трек машинки слушать и смотреть бесплатно в 4К Подсобите свита лайком комментом репостом всех обняу (тикток сильно душит) 🎵 Смотреть

❤39custom 54339782218738997447👍3

Signed goth

17 Oct 2026, 18:53 UTC≈3,680 views62 reactionsread 20 October 2026
Photo

напоминание

custom 543397822187389974443custom 531467898976208331514❤4custom 52740483328539666411

Signed goth

17 Oct 2026, 11:33 UTC≈3,220 views36 reactionsread 20 October 2026
Forwarded from @aviciixd

пацаны вопросов много времени мало, надо пос5 игрока, кто реди катнуть вс никса 1800 птс кидайте цифры пожалуйста в комменты ( дотабаф надо чтоб открытый был )

❤28custom 54339782218738997445custom 52740483328539666413

Signed goth

16 Oct 2026, 18:02 UTC≈4,040 views34 reactionsread 20 October 2026

ладно пох вы берете мою пикчу, но укажите автора инфы хотя бы) дауны

❤27custom 54339782218738997445👍2

Signed goth

16 Oct 2026, 17:59 UTC≈4,050 views47 reactionsread 20 October 2026
Photo

А теперь запоминаем пищевую цепь дота каналов в тг (помимо этого) Rampage | Dota 2 — верхушка Далее Cr*wnf*ll G*b* N*ws D*t*iry D*t* comm*n*t* и остальные каналы с ленивыми админами, тотал позор имея под рукой ии брать и пиздить чужой контент

custom 543397822187389974435❤7👍5

Signed goth

16 Oct 2026, 15:14 UTC≈4,000 views20 reactionsread 20 October 2026
Photo

Интернет должен быть свободным 🔧 И это не должно стоить дорого 🫠 🤩 LEDOKOL VPN — 90₽ в месяц 🔴Полный безлимит 🔴10 Gbps ширина канала 🔴Разнообразие серверов 🔴Преодолевает белые списки 🔴Пригласи 3-х друзей через 👥 Рефералка и пользуйся бесплатно 🫡 Только для подписчиков этого канала: Бесплатный период — 10 дней 💝

❤10custom 54339782218738997446👍4

Signed goth

16 Oct 2026, 11:35 UTC≈4,150 views65 reactionsread 20 October 2026
Photo

Подписчик подарил вот такую красотку Для коллекции осталась только plushy shag

❤45custom 543397822187389974411👍5custom 52740483328539666412custom 53146789897620833152

Signed goth

15 Oct 2026, 19:16 UTC≈4,510 views76 reactionsread 20 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 543397822187389974457❤14👍4💔1

Signed goth

15 Oct 2026, 14:19 UTC≈4,600 views121 reactionsread 20 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 543397822187389974483❤32👍6

Signed goth

14 Oct 2026, 19:09 UTC≈5,060 views44 reactionsread 20 October 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 543397822187389974431❤11👍2

Signed goth

14 Oct 2026, 19:00 UTC≈5,760 views26 reactionsread 20 October 2026

Posted without readable text

😭14❤9custom 52740483328539666412👍1

Signed Randomize Bot 🎲 [Рандомайзер]

Showing the 12 most recent of 156 posts we hold for @gothtearsx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@gothtearsx edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 October 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Sept 2026, 13:26 UTCAnonymous Poll1,570 voters approx.

Если не на морфах, то на ком бы постояли с кайфом 1х1?

  1. Висп17%
  2. Разор8%
  3. Я Сф дрочер44%
  4. Котел10%
  5. Мирана6%
  6. Течис16%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 156 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 19 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Royal Snake | Турниры и Новости DOTA 2
@RoyalSnakee · 27,659
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 September 2026
SamON
@samondota2 · 30,771
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 September 2026
BLYADOTATWO | DOTA COMMUNITY
@BlyaDotaTwo · 57,290
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 August 2026
РофлоДота
@roflodota · 25,519
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“goth tears” (@gothtearsx), 32,197 subscribers as measured 20 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gothtearsx.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.