Video, posted without a caption
👍2❤1🔥1

Channel
@gotrid_pavel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,494subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001844311955 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gotrid_pavel |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 2 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gotrid_pavel |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 1,494 | -6 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:01 | 1,500 | -6 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 1,506 | -7 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:30 | 1,513 | no change |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 1,513 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 13 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
66 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 30 | 45.5% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 21.2% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 16.7% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 9.09% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 3.03% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 1.52% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 1.52% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 1.52% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2025 to 6 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gotrid_pavel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 June 2025 to 6 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Video, posted without a caption
👍2❤1🔥1
Ну все, товар уже выложен в оффлайн магазине🥳
👍2🎉1😍1
Небольшой апдейт. В итоге договорились примерно на ту цену, на которую я рассчитывал изначально. Недавно сам ездил к ним на склад за товаром, познакомился с командой. Это официальный дистрибьютор, поэтому всё с понятным происхождением. Закупил новые категории для сайта: зубные пасты, зубные щётки, ополаскиватели, шампуни, гели для душа и другие товары, которых раньше у меня не было. Также договорились попробовать …
🔥3
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥4👍1🤩1
Теперь уже оригинал https://www.instagram.com/reel/DY_rZXQM81I/?igsh=MXVudXpmb2Q0ejNneA==
🔥2
Video, posted without a caption
🔥5🤩1
Video message, posted without a caption
✍2👍2
Video message, posted without a caption
👍3😈1
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥6❤1
Стабильно раз в год появляюсь тут 😂 За это время мы переехали в новый офис, уже побольше. Взял себе помощника Диму🧑💻, теперь вместе отправляем заказы, многое автоматизировали, стало как-то спокойнее работать. Ещё распродал почти весь товар, который просто лежал на складе📦. И понял, что вообще больше не хочу заниматься б/у товаром, всякими позициями без коробок и вот этим всем. Хочется уже нормально строить что-то …
🔥4❤2
Полгода назад познакомился с Алексеем — владельцем сети нишевых парфюмерных магазинов Жан. Он поделился кучей инсайтов и дал понять, какие шаги в нише делать не стоит. Например, почему островок в ТЦ — провальный формат ⚰️. Зато его самого реально удивила моя бизнес-модель🤔. Сказал, что никогда раньше ничего подобного не слышал. После такой беседы ещё больше понял, что иду своим путём.
❤5👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @gotrid_pavel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как думаете, что получится с автоматом этим летом?🚶
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2025 to 6 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gotrid” (@gotrid_pavel), 1,494 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gotrid_pavel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.