☀️ Nos vemos hoy a las 20h de España, en el canal de Laura: https://www.youtube.com/live/SyhZf5H_g7U
👍2👏2

Channel
@grabatuhospital
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,147subscribers
+826 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001223905705 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @grabatuhospital |
| Description | 💢NO PIDO DONATIVOS, NI VENDO NADA. NO ESCRIBO PRIVADOS 💢 En la PLANdemia demostramos que los Hospitales estaban VACÍOS. Ahora seguimos aportando información para sumar nuestra luz en el despertar de la consciencia. Por una HUMANIDAD LIBRE. 🙌🤍💪 |
| Created | 14 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/grabatuhospital |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 16:00 | 7,147 | -57 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 19:29 | 7,204 | -37 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 03:16 | 7,241 | -56 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 08:58 | 7,297 | -44 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 02:54 | 7,341 | -3 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 20:29 | 7,344 | -12 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 05:41 | 7,356 | -5 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 18:26 | 7,361 | -7 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 11:39 | 7,368 | -8 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 01:56 | 7,376 | -9 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 01:16 | 7,385 | -10 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 02:00 | 7,395 | -19 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 02:56 | 7,414 | -5 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 21:21 | 7,419 | -11 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:37 | 7,430 | -4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:13 | 7,434 | -9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 7,443 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 7,446 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:23 | 7,451 | -7 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 7,458 | first reading |
100 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 30 of 31 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 100 (1 August 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 3,890 |
| Reactions total | 118 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 20:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 26 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
517 reactions across 90 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 208 | 40.2% | |
| 💯 | 166 | 32.1% | |
| ❤ | 80 | 15.5% | |
| 👏 | 21 | 4.06% | |
| 🤬 | 21 | 4.06% | |
| 😱 | 7 | 1.35% | |
| 🤓 | 6 | 1.16% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 1.16% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.193% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.193% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 91 of the 100 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 517 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 100 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 31 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
☀️ Nos vemos hoy a las 20h de España, en el canal de Laura: https://www.youtube.com/live/SyhZf5H_g7U
👍2👏2
☢️ Efectivamente, ellos vienen a imponer su RELIGIÓN. Que no su cultura. 🦁 La cultura de un pueblo comprende su lengua, sus costumbres, su gastronomía, su música, su folclore y sus tradiciones, desarrolladas a lo largo de generaciones bajo la influencia de su tierra, su clima y su historia. 🕌 La religión es un sistema de creencias y normas que puede formar parte de una cultura, pero no es la cultura en sí misma. 🔫…
👍4❤3
⚡️ Jesús o Mahoma: ¿A cuál de los dos crees que es más fácil someter o matar? A ver si con esta pregunta tomas conciencia de lo que quieren hacer contigo gracias al buenismo. 🛑 La religión siempre es sumisión. Sin embargo, en un "combate" entre religiones, la historia instalada en tu psique es que Jesús siempre acaba en la cruz... @gendeorigen
👍4💯3
🙈 Para esto han estado haciendo la campaña de: cambia tú, que me incomodas. Para que ahora confundas el respeto a sus costumbres, con la obligación de cambiar tu comportamiento. 🎯 Eres libre de dejar de comer, de follarte una cabra o tirarte por un barranco. Pero tu libertad termina donde comienza la mía. Soy libre de comer lo que quiera, condenar la zoofilia y estar en contra del suicidio. ❌ ME OPONGO ÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑ…
💯7
🔥 El buenismo era verde y se lo comió un burro... 🐺🎱 Todos tenemos derecho a sanidad, y todos tenemos derecho a que cada uno se pague lo suyo. 🍀 La sanidad pública española no nació con el modelo de acceso universal como el que tenemos ahora. Nació fundamentalmente como un seguro vinculado al trabajo y a las cotizaciones. 👀 No he encontrado una contabilidad nacional pública que permita determinar cuánto cuesta anu…
👍7
🌹 ¿Cómo funciona la codificación de la magia oscura, y de dónde saco la proposición subyacente?
❤3
🗞 La Policía detiene a una docena de personas y registra la sede de Núcleo Nacional en una operación bajo secreto, detenidos en varias provincias españolas, entre ellas Pontevedra, Burgos, Alicante, Valladolid, Asturias, Guadalajara y Madrid. 🛑 El mismo dispositivo que fue puesto por el sistema para agitar el hormiguero, es detenido y retirado por el sistema, como ejemplo para amedrentar al que piensa distinto... h…
💯4
⚡️ En la tradición judía, Lilith es un personaje mitológico y folclórico que aparece tanto como un demonio nocturno como, en textos de la literatura rabínica posterior, como la primera esposa de Adán. 🛑 Ahora piensa: para el sistema eres conspiranoico, negacionista, antivacunas y un peligro para la sociedad. Los buenos son los que se someten. ⚡️ Si después de esta explicación sigues sin entiender por qué me llamo L…
👍4
Ellos entienden, y yo también. ❌ ME OPONGO ÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑ CÓDIGOS VISTOS Y DESACTIVADOS. DEVUELVO EL MAL MULTIPLICADO POR 72 VECES 7. @gendeorigen
👍3
🌿 ¿Y si lo que está desordenado en tu vida no fuera una cuestión de “mala suerte”, sino un programa ancestral que lleva años dirigiendo tu vida? A veces una persona llega a un punto en el que ya ha intentado muchas cosas: Ha pensado mucho. Ha entendido muchas cosas. Ha puesto voluntad. Ha intentado cambiar. Ha querido avanzar. Ha hecho mil terapias. Y aun así… algo no termina de estar bien. El mismo tipo de relación …
🥸 Están desesperados para hacerte creer que los fallecidos del accidente son verdad. 🚨Me han pasado esto: Todas las víctimas identificadas del accidente de trenes de Urda: la joven ingeniera, el guardia recién casado, el artista mexicano... https://share.google/f0FxKmBIxlcy0IZor 🧐 Pero pasa una cosa: he analizado muchos de los supuestos muertos, y detrás de cada historia hay una analogía mágica con maleficium. La s…
👍7
🙌 Nos vemos esta tarde en el canal de Julio de Canal5 a las 20:00h (hora peninsular) donde estaré hablando de: "URDA=URNA: ¿Accidente o ritual teatralizado?" ☀️ Agradezco a Julio este espacio, y os espero en el directo. Podéis verlo en cualquiera de estos enlaces: 🎞 YOUTUBE: https://youtube.com/@directoc5tv 🎮 TWITCH: https://www.twitch.tv/canal5digital
👍2👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 100 posts we hold for @grabatuhospital. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Graba tu Hospital CANAL OFICIAL” (@grabatuhospital), 7,147 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/grabatuhospital.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.