Bot
Gram Events
@gramevents_bot
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry
10,789monthly users
-15,786 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | 8835940611 |
|---|---|
| Type | Bot |
| Username | @gramevents_bot |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gramevents_bot |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Monthly users | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 10,789 | -538 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 02:02 | 11,327 | -764 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:23 | 12,091 | -4,350 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:00 | 16,441 | no change |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:44 | 16,441 | -1,291 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:59 | 17,732 | -2,462 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 20,194 | -6,381 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 26,575 | first reading |
Engagement
No post feed to measure. Telegram publishes a readable post stream for channels, not for bots, so views, reactions and engagement rates do not exist for this entry — they are not missing, pending or withheld. The register records what this handle is and what it resolves to.
Mentions
Named by 321 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@Gram_TL_IR · 12,9799 postsایردراپ | کریپتو | ارز دیجیتال
@tapswap_orginal · 8,0596 postsARI-4N
@AR14N24B · 37,3975 postsКриптоСкуф
@kr1pt0_skuf · 50,8455 postsآهنگ|تولید محتوا
@photographicposts · 40,0865 postsSarhang meme| سرهنگ میم
@Sarhang_meme · 23,4015 postsWIENER DOGE PAYOUTS
@WienerDogePayouts · 14,1185 posts𝐀𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐲𝐚 𝐓𝐞𝐜𝐡™ 🔥
@Aditya_Tech25 · 28,2484 posts@AirDropLife
@airdrop_lifes · 24,1074 postsmatrix market
@matrix_market_channel · 104 postsСюрприз конкурсовикк
@nemnogopodarkov · 12,7604 postsTG Group Buyer
@oldgroupbuyer_legit · 8,6214 postsCrypto_Earning 🇧🇩
@Wahid400 · 924 postsOnline Earning Tricks 🇧🇩
@Ahad622 · 373 postsAirdrop Ninja Pro
@AirdropNinja365 · 166,7033 postsAirdrops | Earn Free Crypto
@CryptoAirdrops678 · 12,6123 postsDe UniQue Web3 Club
@deuniqueweb3club · 2023 postsFREE ONLINE INCOME 💵💲
@freeoi247 · 133 postsPavel Durov Frens
@frensdurov · 1203 postsFurtuu Jireenyaa
@furtuu_jiruu · 5,5823 postsMUSA TECH
@musatech1 · 11,1263 postsROBIUL HASAN
@R70177 · 373 postsTeach & trick zone 🤖
@Teach2trick2zone · 3673 postsTINDER DNA
@Tinder_y · 3,5133 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gram Events” (@gramevents_bot), 10,789 monthly users as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gramevents_bot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.