Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Евгения Кретова, писатель

Channel

Евгения Кретова, писатель

@gramotnyisamizdat

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

660subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001518635421
TypeChannel
Username@gramotnyisamizdat
Created25 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/gramotnyisamizdat

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

660669664.57 August 2026 — 669 subscribers7 August 2026 — 669 subscribers14 August 2026 — 668 subscribers21 August 2026 — 667 subscribers27 August 2026 — 665 subscribers5 September 2026 — 662 subscribers12 September 2026 — 660 subscribers7 August 202612 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 37 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 659–670 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 20:38660-2
5 Sept 2026, 10:00662-3
27 Aug 2026, 21:34665-2
21 Aug 2026, 06:05667-1
14 Aug 2026, 12:37668-1
7 Aug 2026, 08:16669no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:04669first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

104 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5855.8%
🔥3331.7%
👍54.81%
💔54.81%
🆒21.92%
😱10.962%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 10 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gramotnyisamizdat. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC28 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @edinaya_galaktikaPhoto

В тот день на "Фокусе" была плановая диагностика, Пауков забрал всех членов экипажа, кроме дежурного, в медблок и там запер в диагностических саркофагах, сверяя биопараметры с расчетными. - Важничает, будто кило таахиров проглотил, - отметил Хаско, зевая. Он от диагностики наотрез отказался, сославшись на острое встречное желание взломать систему и продиагностировать нейроинтерфейс корабля. Влад Чайка, дежуривший в р…

🔥6

Signed Evgenia Kretova🇷🇺

3 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC76 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @angrypublisher

Понеслись отмены авторов за ИИ. Дебютный роман Джерри Фаладе "Call Me, I’ll Hide the Body" ждали все, за рукопись боролись 14 издательств, а предложение превысило 2 000 000$. Но сделка сорвалась. Литературные агенты заявили, что больше не могут достоверно установить, как создавался текст и применялся ли в работе искусственный интеллект. Автор, конечно, всё отрицает, но 14 издательств и 2 млн не вернуть. Похоже, тепе…

🔥7😱1

Signed Evgenia Kretova🇷🇺

28 Jul 2026, 11:30 UTC106 viewsread 7 August 2026

У моего редактора беда с котом, серьезная болячка, требуется помощь:

Signed Evgenia Kretova🇷🇺

28 Jul 2026, 11:30 UTC111 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ratrebellion

Себастьяну нужны переливание крови и стационар. Если кто-то готов помочь денюшкой для переливания крови Себастьяну и для стационара, то я открыла сбор. Буду очень благодарна, потому что для меня это какие-то неподъемные суммы( https://messenger.online.sberbank.ru/sl/Le0uOynrvoY3r1GYY

💔5

Signed Evgenia Kretova🇷🇺

24 Jul 2026, 11:13 UTC142 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @eksmofreedomrussiaPhoto

Две подруги. Один неосторожный договор. Чужое счастье, оплаченное страданиями. Тёмный лес, топи с нежитью и гребень, который ворует молодость по капле. 📒 Погружаемся в мрачную атмосферу с цитатами из книги «Темный обет». OZON | Читай-город | Book24 | WB 🔞

❤8👍2

Signed Evgenia Kretova🇷🇺

23 Jul 2026, 14:17 UTC119 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Немного обидно за подзабытую серию Романтических детективов. Исправляюсь. напоминаю)) Лучший способ заставить женщину слушать - извиниться перед ней (Глеб Фадеев из "Дзен московского олигарха") Один из самых популярных мужчин в серии "Романтические детективы" - Глеб Фадеев. Очаровательный нахал, крутой спец, которому выпало на долю приструнить падчерицу шефа. Студентка юрфака, она как раз вошла в стадию профессиона…

❤16🔥5

Signed Evgenia Kretova🇷🇺

21 Jul 2026, 12:15 UTC89 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @darknoirvillePhoto

И все-таки я решительно не понимаю… …почему для многих сейчас фантастика — это что-то очень страшное и непонятное? Я сейчас читаю две параллельно книги в этом жанре, прочитала собственную «Точку», и у меня вообще не возникает ощущения, что это трудные для восприятия книги. При том, что я гуманитарий до мозга костей, я не математик, не физик, не инженер. Да даже если взять классику фантастики, если это не какой-нибу…

❤10👍2🆒2

Signed Evgenia Kretova🇷🇺

21 Jul 2026, 12:15 UTC79 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Абсолютно согласна с Эйрин: на пороге новой волны научно-технического прогресса фантастика не пугает, она становится той самой реальностью с умными домами, нейроинтерфейсами, ИИ-помощниками.

🔥6❤1👍1

Signed Evgenia Kretova🇷🇺

20 Jul 2026, 10:44 UTC100 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @eksmofreedomrussiaPhoto

В «Темном обете», второй книге цикла «Проклятая княжна», каждый заплатил за свою мечту. Кто-то обрёл мудрость, кто-то — настоящую любовь, а кто-то потерял всё. 📖 Давайте посмотрим, как изменились герои «Темного обета»: Милица Хотела вернуть отцу богатство, спасти семью от нищеты. Превратилась в старуху, которую родной отец не узнал, была изгнана, постигла одиночество и жизнь на грани. В итоге поняла: счастье не в з…

❤11🔥1

Signed Evgenia Kretova🇷🇺

16 Jul 2026, 11:14 UTC114 views20 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ну, вот мы и встретились)) Моя 30-я изданная в бумаге книга (межавторские сборники не считаю) приехала домой! Полдня обнимались, такая хорошенькая. Если вы есть во Вконтактике, присоединяйтесь к праздничному розыгрышу, там бокс с мерчем 😉

❤12🔥8

Signed Evgenia Kretova🇷🇺

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @gramotnyisamizdat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Евгения Кретова, писатель” (@gramotnyisamizdat), 660 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gramotnyisamizdat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.