@grandcoaching_pro was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
@artem_khamadullin_pro held 22 August 2026 – 22 August 2026
Growth
5 measurements spanning 23 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 779–786 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Sept 2026, 07:39
780
-1
4 Sept 2026, 10:22
781
no change
4 Sept 2026, 09:47
781
-4
22 Aug 2026, 20:33
785
no change
22 Aug 2026, 10:30
785
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 1 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
197 reactions across 13 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
64
32.5%
👍
45
22.8%
❤
27
13.7%
❤🔥
15
7.61%
😁
14
7.11%
💯
10
5.08%
⚡
5
2.54%
🙏
5
2.54%
🏆
3
1.52%
👏
3
1.52%
🕊
2
1.02%
👌
1
0.508%
👾
1
0.508%
😱
1
0.508%
🤝
1
0.508%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 197 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 1 December 2024 to 5 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 16 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @grandcoaching_pro. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 December 2024 to 5 February 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Набор аудитории для тех, кто с нуля
Или новые хроники перелидоза.
На скрине "многацифор" и графики. Для экспертов всегда делаю таблицу в виде приборной доски, чтобы всегда было понятно, куда движется проект.
Как видите, получили взрывной рост статистик по каждому показателю. Залетели новые ролики в ютуб. Где мы попробовали несколько гипотез и трендов.
Темы взяли провокационные, вовлеченность выросла в пять раз, а…
Вот что я понял спустя 469 часов чистого разговора и 11633 исходящих звонков.
Первая часть
Вторая часть
Третья часть
Четвертая часть
Пятая часть
Бывает такое состояние, когда очень хочется делать, но как только садишься за задачу, то просто не можешь сдвинуться с места. И понимаешь, что надо! Но никак. И заставлять себя пробовал и мотивировать конфеткой.
Не прет и все.
Как будто-то одновременно нажал педаль газа …
Вот это голосовое, которое выше разместил,не знаю как назвать. Что-то подобное я делал уже ранее
А ля "голосовое от коуча"
или
вот какие голосовые я бы хотел получать от наставника, если бы я приуныл и ничего не хотел бы делать. Ни контент писать, ни эфиры пробовать.
Это кстати тоже может быть идеей для вашего контента. Суть проста: вы своим клиентам в терапии и коучинге наговариваете голосовые, так ведь? В этих …
О психологах.
Меня тут спросили (нет, правда спросили, это не подводка к тексту) как выбрать себе психолога. И казалось бы, у меня огромная база. Я помог 297 человеку из сферы помогающей профессии. И продающих консультаций провел около 650+& Просто протяни руку - наткнешься на психолога))
И к своему ахую, обнаружил, что сам-то я мог бы доверить свой мозг только двум людям - Вадиму или Екатерине.
А уж друзьям и зн…
Горячий контент 🔥🔥🔥 для денежных коучей, инвест наставников и гуру "финансовой грамотности"
Почему в кавычках? Сам по себе термин финансовая грамотность - затерт и опошлен. Его используют сейчас очень часто и без глубокого содержания.
Это что ж получается?
Тот кто интересуется грамотностью - изначально безграмотен?)
Нееее, на такое признание подписчик с повышенным чувством эго не пойдет) Можно взять другой нейми…
Обожаю эту атмосферу.
Сегодня пишем контент, видеоролики для Ютуба. И все эти кнопки, инструменты так кайфово создают обстановку творчества.
Чувствую себя тут в своей тарелке ❤️
Знаете, есть такой жанр: книги которые никогда не выйдут, или фильмы, которые мы никогда не посмотрим. Читал сообщества в ВК, где с помощью нейросетки создают интересные идеи несуществующих фильмов. Например, если бы Чужих снимал Леонид Гайдай.
Вот и у меня в голове сейчас работает нейросеть, которая сама по себе генерирует гениальные идеи для контента блогов. Ну как гениальные... это уже на ваш взгляд)))
Мне вот т…
Схема новогоднего поста, дарю!
[Тут я подвел итоги года]
[Тут пожелания на будущий год]
[Тут 10 главных инсайтов]
[Тут благодарности себе и миру]
Базовый план новогоднего поста считаю выполненным, пошел есть мандарины)))
И вам того же желаю! 🍊🍊🍊🍊🍊🍾🍾🍾🍾🍾🥗🥗🥗🥗🥗🍗🍗🍗🍗🍗🎄🎄🎄🎄🎄🎄🎄🎄🎄
Я всегда думал, что это байки эйчаров. Пока не столкнулся сам.
Нанял я тут в проект еще одного SMMщика. Этапов найма я всегда делаю много, чтобы заранее выставить фильтр.
По принципу "нанимай медленно, увольняй быстро"
Сейчас моя воронка найма выглядит так:
1. Короткая анкета
2. Тестовое задание на 30 минут
3. Просматриваю резюме тех, кто выполнил задание
4. Те, кто мне понравились - попадают на первый этап собес…
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @grandcoaching_pro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Рубрика для блога коуча по отношениям/женского коуча, которая даст буст охвата58%
Как с юмором подать душный материал клинического терапевта42%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 1 December 2024 to 5 February 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@grandcoaching_pro named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@coach_go_club named in 1 post, 23 August 2026 – 23 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Подруга маркетолог (Маргарита Захарова) @marketing_dir · 34,329 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
Удаленная РАБОТА @Udalennaya_Rabota5 · 60,341 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ГРАНДкоучинг - путь наставника.” (@grandcoaching_pro), 780 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/grandcoaching_pro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.