Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Внук деда

Channel

Внук деда

@grandpasgrandson

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

196subscribers

+14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001514376081
TypeChannel
Username@grandpasgrandson
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/grandpasgrandson

Growth

1821961896 August 2026 — 182 subscribers7 August 2026 — 182 subscribers24 August 2026 — 184 subscribers10 September 2026 — 196 subscribers6 August 202610 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 34 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 180–198 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 03:39196+12
24 Aug 2026, 15:25184+2
7 Aug 2026, 08:02182no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:05182first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5443161635046833571850.0%
custom 5319213199621379207425.0%
custom 5287251092386626340318.8%
custom 546519833055855710716.25%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC43 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Случайно забытый секундомер у меня насчитал уже 822 дня 17 часов 46 минут 40 секунд. У кого больше?

3 Aug 2026, 09:39 UTC47 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Все-таки Leatherman - хороший инструмент. Иначе бы ёбнуло меня.

custom 52872510923866263402custom 53192131996213792071custom 54651983305585571071

30 Jul 2026, 21:37 UTC83 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вообще не понимаю как можно есть супы без майонеза. Ну кроме крем-супов, ок.

custom 54431616350468335714

28 Jul 2026, 11:35 UTC76 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Чувак за 24 часа собрал в Claude полноценную браузерную космическую игру с открытым миром, полётами, планетами, посадками, сюжетом и процедурной генерацией. И это не фэйк: игра реально запускается, код лежит на GitHub, проект довольно жирный (как я). Но и без нюансов не обошлось: не «написал один промпт и ушёл пить пиво за гаражами». Чувак выстроил в Claude полноценный цикл работы с кодом, Blender, тестами, скриншо

custom 53192131996213792072

26 Jul 2026, 19:05 UTC76 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Очередная подборка на тему «Придумай суперспособность, а первый кто прокомментирует - придумывает тебе побочный эффект».

25 Jul 2026, 16:00 UTC74 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Опять моя любимая рубрика «…а вот раньше!» Всегда умиляюсь когда говорят что мол раньше люди жили дольше, выглядели лучше, и вообще все было хорошо, потому что если натуральную пищу (тут отдельная тема про многовековые ГМО, еще до изобретения «генетики» как науки), занимались физическим трудом (который облагораживает), и природа не была так загрязнена (природе, в целом, похую). Самуил Мартынович Дудин (1863-1929).

custom 54431616350468335714custom 52872510923866263401

21 Jul 2026, 19:49 UTC99 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, худеем? Первый день был норм (поставился ближе к вечеру), на второй я думал что умру нахуй, чувство тошноты весь день, голова кружилась, тело ватное, но даже смог поработать час, и за этот час сделал дел столько, сколько обычно делаю минут за пять🫪 Третий день пройден сегодня, все еще сил мало, но почти не тошнило, и смог даже доехать к ребятам на трансляцию онлайн фестиваля тату @forma_tattoofest В целом

custom 53192131996213792071

9 Jul 2026, 08:05 UTC121 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Кошки глупее собак? Нет, им просто похую. Собаки действительно быстрее учатся командам, лучше понимают человеческие жесты и легче работают с людьми. Но это не значит, что они умнее, тут причина интереснее и проще. Селекция. Собак человек выводил десятки тысяч лет именно как партнеров: самых дружелюбных, послушных и ориентированных на человека оставляли для дальнейшего разведения. Кошек почти никто так не отбирал

7 Jul 2026, 17:00 UTC100 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Что вы знаете о рабочих чатах?

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @grandpasgrandson. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Внук деда” (@grandpasgrandson), 196 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/grandpasgrandson.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.