Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for grcz

Channel

grcz

@grczofficial

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

209subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001819190484
TypeChannel
Username@grczofficial
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/grczofficial

Growth

2032092069 August 2026 — 203 subscribers9 August 2026 — 203 subscribers17 August 2026 — 206 subscribers25 August 2026 — 208 subscribers1 September 2026 — 207 subscribers10 September 2026 — 209 subscribers9 August 202610 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 32 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 202–210 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 06:20209+2
1 Sept 2026, 13:23207-1
25 Aug 2026, 10:28208+2
17 Aug 2026, 11:47206+3
9 Aug 2026, 13:22203no change
9 Aug 2026, 02:45203first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 03s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

290 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 540442937086339531418864.8%
custom 5465141327752613359217.24%
custom 5467817792457687543206.90%
custom 5404658172361188175165.52%
custom 5456146394924469888155.17%
custom 5465174935871703612124.14%
custom 5467676634062537765124.14%
custom 546567015419086776962.07%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 290 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @grczofficial. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 May 2026 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 17:41 UTC130 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 540442937086339531411custom 54678177924576875433

20 Jul 2026, 12:56 UTC298 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 540442937086339531414custom 54678177924576875431

28 Jun 2026, 17:03 UTC342 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @erialessVideo

worthless w/@cryptstatickillass. July 17

custom 54651749358717036129custom 54656701541908677695custom 54046581723611881754

27 Jun 2026, 14:16 UTC322 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 54044293708633953145custom 54676766340625377653

21 Jun 2026, 19:55 UTC327 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 54678177924576875437custom 54561463949244698882

13 Jun 2026, 00:26 UTC403 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

новая музыка скоро

custom 54044293708633953148custom 54046581723611881753custom 54651413277526133593custom 54561463949244698881

3 Jun 2026, 22:25 UTC501 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

ангелкор круто!

custom 54044293708633953149custom 54046581723611881753custom 54651749358717036123

1 Jun 2026, 10:37 UTC452 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 54676766340625377655custom 54044293708633953143custom 54046581723611881751custom 54561463949244698881

1 Jun 2026, 05:33 UTC382 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @lostwwavePhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 540442937086339531412custom 54561463949244698884custom 54651413277526133594

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @grczofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“grcz” (@grczofficial), 209 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/grczofficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.