7 measurements spanning 42 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 144–152 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 01:19
151
+4
9 Sept 2026, 18:00
147
+1
24 Aug 2026, 19:28
146
+1
16 Aug 2026, 05:14
145
-2
8 Aug 2026, 20:45
147
no change
8 Aug 2026, 15:26
147
+1
8 Aug 2026, 01:00
146
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 9 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
25s
Average length
25s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
179 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
141
78.8%
💘
9
5.03%
😢
8
4.47%
🤣
8
4.47%
😭
4
2.23%
❤🔥
3
1.68%
👍
3
1.68%
🔥
3
1.68%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 179 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 19 we hold a reading for · 42%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @greatandsweet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 June 2026 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
petal by ariana grande is out. if you ever liked her songs, you’ll LOVE this album. the songs just sound so NEW and not like anything else she has released before! 😊
here are my personal favs:
hate that i made you love me - 10/10; no comment, this is AMAZING.
petal - 10/10; the instrumental goes so HARD. the vocals are JUST great. wait till the end when you listen to this one!
bad thing (bunny hop) - 10/10; the s…
hey, how are you all? hope you’ve been doing okay. feel free to drop a comment or dm me. i’m always glad to talk to each one of you.
got some news to share:
first, the channel has a new username now: @greatandsweet i really like it. curious what you think of the profile pic too: it’s the triathlon park in astana, a great spot for a walk with friends. it’s got this Game of Thrones-inspired “kingdom,” and the pic is …
i guess all of you are aware i have this anonymous messages box. feel free to use it by the way! i’m very open for your letters :-)
here’s the link: just press this text.
anyway, i got this message today:
you are making insecure and inspired at the same time 🥹
i’m so sorry if i made any of you “insecure”—the intent of this channel is for me (and you) to speak about various things; i share my honest thoughts, and …
some of you may know that i am a graduate of the most competitive technical bootcamp in the country—nFactorial Incubator (3% acceptance rate among 3000 applicants each year and only 75 people are awarded the full scholarship—i’m one of them)
today i got this question on my anonymous questions bot, so i decided that i would like to detail my experience with the application there
hi! how did you get into the nfactori…
oh yeah, also now that i talked about relationships, i do want to share what i think about them
specifically, i would like to talk about my takes on love..? you can leave some comments and tell me what you think OR just react with emojis like you all usually do.
spoilers in advance though: some of my friends have already had this conversation with me while i was talking to them. if this reads like something you’ve …
there’s a funny thing i noticed in people’s behavior: reputation means more than anything 😭
a few days ago, i was reading one public post where somebody has asked if it’s okay to have 4 exes at the age of 18. gosh, everyone was so negative there! don’t get me wrong, ALMOST 95% of people said it’s wrong to have a record of dating so “many” people!
meanwhile, celebrities like Ariana Grande have a public record of sev…
GUESS WHO'S A LEGAL ADULT NOWW
AND GUESS WHO IS ON MR. VOENKOMAT'S WATCHLIST?
you're technically supposed to open the spoilered image now
I'D LIKE TO THANK MY SWEET FRIENDS FOR ALL THE HEARTFELT MESSAGES THEY'VE SENT ME - I'VE READ EACH ONE CAREFULLY AND YOU ALL MADE ME SO HAPPY. THANK YOU FOR BEING WITH MEEE !!!!! <333
JUST KNOW THAT I VALUE YOU ALL SOO OSOOO MUCH
won’t be teaching there but my friend is hosting this great marathon - you may wanna check it out
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @greatandsweet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“please” (@greatandsweet), 151 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/greatandsweet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.