Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Reese Report

Channel

Reese Report

@gregreesevideoreports

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

38,820subscribers

-414 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001480856656
TypeChannel
Username@gregreesevideoreports
Descriptionhttps://reesereport.com/
Created2 March 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/gregreesevideoreports

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

38,82039,24139,030.56 August 2026 — 39,234 subscribers7 August 2026 — 39,241 subscribers8 August 2026 — 39,232 subscribers8 August 2026 — 39,227 subscribers10 August 2026 — 39,209 subscribers10 August 2026 — 39,182 subscribers11 August 2026 — 39,183 subscribers12 August 2026 — 39,172 subscribers14 August 2026 — 39,162 subscribers15 August 2026 — 39,146 subscribers16 August 2026 — 39,139 subscribers17 August 2026 — 39,140 subscribers18 August 2026 — 39,126 subscribers19 August 2026 — 39,124 subscribers20 August 2026 — 39,100 subscribers21 August 2026 — 39,097 subscribers23 August 2026 — 39,089 subscribers24 August 2026 — 39,072 subscribers25 August 2026 — 39,056 subscribers26 August 2026 — 39,037 subscribers27 August 2026 — 39,031 subscribers28 August 2026 — 39,015 subscribers29 August 2026 — 39,008 subscribers30 August 2026 — 38,998 subscribers31 August 2026 — 38,975 subscribers1 September 2026 — 38,959 subscribers2 September 2026 — 38,945 subscribers4 September 2026 — 38,929 subscribers6 September 2026 — 38,882 subscribers9 September 2026 — 38,820 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 35 days, net -414. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38,757–39,304 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 22:3838,820-62
6 Sept 2026, 17:1538,882-47
4 Sept 2026, 07:3538,929-16
2 Sept 2026, 17:5638,945-14
1 Sept 2026, 20:1538,959-16
31 Aug 2026, 17:1738,975-23
30 Aug 2026, 20:3638,998-10
29 Aug 2026, 20:2639,008-7
28 Aug 2026, 22:1539,015-16
27 Aug 2026, 21:5339,031-6
26 Aug 2026, 18:5939,037-19
25 Aug 2026, 21:2839,056-16
24 Aug 2026, 17:5639,072-17
23 Aug 2026, 03:0439,089-8
21 Aug 2026, 17:4739,097-3
20 Aug 2026, 18:1839,100-24
19 Aug 2026, 18:0639,124-2
18 Aug 2026, 20:1739,126-14
17 Aug 2026, 22:3339,140+1
16 Aug 2026, 20:5839,139first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 15 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 75 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.9%
avg views ÷ 38,820 subscribers
Avg views / post
17,800
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026
Posts held26 (15 April 20267 September 2026)
Views total89,140
Reactions total802
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Sept 2026, 03:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
132
Videos
422
Links
87

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2h 09m
Average length
5m 37s

Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6,364 reactions across 26 posts, in 47 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1,93230.4%
👍1,73927.3%
84613.3%
🤔3315.20%
🤬1983.11%
🙏1752.75%
💯1652.59%
😈1572.47%
🤡1392.18%
811.27%
👏751.18%
🤮580.911%
💩500.786%
👀390.613%
🤯390.613%
👎380.597%
❤‍🔥300.471%
😱300.471%
🤣300.471%
🥱300.471%
27 further kinds1822.86%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,364 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Sept 2026, 13:03 UTC≈9,240 views147 reactionsread 12 September 2026
Video

Egoic Mind and the Silent Witness

🔥82👍2811👏10🤔10💩3❤‍🔥1🎃1

31 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC≈18,500 views206 reactionsread 12 September 2026
Video

Balance & Power with Pranayama

117👍50💩14🔥6🏆5🤡4😎32

26 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC≈19,200 views221 reactionsread 12 September 2026
Video

Free Will and the Gift of Human Incarnation

🙏82👍45❤‍🔥2928🤣10🤔7🤮76

19 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC≈24,500 views180 reactionsread 12 September 2026
Video

Another Psyop

👍68🔥35💯2912👎9🤡7💊6👏4

17 Aug 2026, 23:22 UTC≈17,700 views48 reactionsread 12 September 2026

https://distrokid.com/hyperfollow/autarchos/another-psyop?utm_campaign=website&utm_medium=Email+&utm_source=SendGrid

🤔249🥴6👍5👎2🗿2

11 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC≈28,500 views249 reactionsread 12 September 2026
Video

Dreams & an Interdimensional Nature of Reality

👍121🔥4538🤔14🥴7👎6🤣6😴5

4 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC≈66,100 views264 reactionsread 12 September 2026
Video

Crop Formations, Orbs, and the Mowing Devil

👍135🔥6234🤔9🤣9💅4💩42

27 Jul 2026, 13:02 UTC≈43,700 views249 reactionsread 12 September 2026
Video

Mind Over Matter

👍121🔥5332🤮9🤔85🤪5👎4

21 Jul 2026, 13:04 UTC≈44,400 views266 reactionsread 12 September 2026
Video

Cymatics and the Mysteries of the Cathedrals

132🔥52👍48💯12👏7🤔6🥰3🤪2

15 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC≈44,000 views283 reactionsread 12 September 2026
Video

Flock, Axon, Israel, and American Freedom

🔥122👍59😈38🤬21👏11🤯96😱6

9 Jul 2026, 12:57 UTC≈58,100 views268 reactionsread 12 September 2026
Video

New SAR Scans Reveal a Second Sphinx on Giza Plateau

🔥127👍7619🥱108👀7🫡6😱5

1 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC≈32,800 views130 reactionsread 12 September 2026
Video

https://gregreese.substack.com/subscribe

👍80🔥2797🙏4🏆2💊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @gregreesevideoreports. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

The Truth Warrior
@The_Truth_Warrior · 96
7 posts
Liberty or Death
@libertyordeathisnotachoice · 1
4 posts
Scorched Pages
@ScorchedPages · 7
4 posts
AR617📯👑
@AR617_8 · 22
2 posts
Free Thyself
@freethyself · 39
2 posts
Pariah Media
@pariahmedia · 336
2 posts
•TRUTH WINS•
@truthwins888 · 383
2 posts
Waking World
@wakingworld · 71
2 posts
Wandering Polymath
@wanderingpolymath · 4
2 posts
A Quest Of Transcendence 🌌
@aquestoftranscendence · 29
1 post
BORG
@borgborgborg · 7
1 post
CABAL Knowledge Vault
@CABAL_Vault · 163
1 post
Camgo05
@Camgo5 · 4
1 post
Canadian UnFiltered
@canadianunfiltered · 11
1 post
COUNTERSPIN MEDIA (OFFICIAL)
@counterspin · 7,524
1 post
Rage Against The Illuminati
@DANKTRUTH · 97
1 post
ENGINEERED PANDEMIC
@engineeredpandemic · 5
1 post
LostDivinity
@er3169 · 5
1 post
ExposingTheTruth2day
@ExposingTheTruth2day · 497
1 post
Follow The White Rabbit ™ 🐇
@followsthewhiterabbit · 80,169
1 post
Grand Solar Minima.
@GrandSolarMinima · 21
1 post
Dangerous INFO Podcast
@jessejaymz · 33
1 post
Home Grown Truth
@JuicyFruitForest · 240
1 post
Truth Quest
@keefstone · 40
1 post
Liberty Warrior
@LibertyWarrior_9 · 277
1 post
Malaysian Freedom Movement
@MalaysianFreedomMovement · 4,277
1 post
Maui Fire
@mauiwildfire · 75
1 post
Smell the CoVFeFe
@openyourchannels · 242
1 post
Patriots Only
@patriotsonly · 352
1 post
The Planned Depopulation
@planneddepop · 387
1 post
Qlobal-Change USA 🇺🇸
@QlobalChangeUSA · 7,896
1 post
SilverSammy
@SantasSilverSammy · 445
1 post
🐇🐇🐇🐇🐇🐇🐇🐇🐇🐇🐇🐇🐇🐇🐇🐇🐇
@SeventeenWhiteRabbits · 66
1 post
S-Tier Link Aggregation
@stierlinks · 82
1 post
Die Alte Welt führt uns zum Neuen
@tataria777 · 4,488
1 post
The Conspiracy Hole
@TheConspiracyHole · 106,103
1 post
TheKirbyQ
@TheKirbyQ · 160
1 post
🦠True Voice Channel
@TrueVoiceChannel · 7
1 post
Santa Surfing
@trumpsbestgirl · 2,383
1 post
🦠Truth Movement Chat
@TruthMovementChat · 17
1 post
Unmask Colorado
@UnmaskColorado · 35
1 post
Olga Vita, Health Coach
@vitalityproject · 54
1 post
WEOH TRUTH
@weohtruth · 18
1 post
World Doctors Alliance
@worlddoctorsalliance · 76,573
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Health Ranger
@RealHealthRanger · 63,643
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
Just a Dude 😎
@JustDudeChannel · 63,650
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 August 2026
STRANGER THAN FICTION NEWS
@stfn_news · 63,299
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 August 2026
FallCabal Official Channel
@Fall_of_the_Cabal · 82,395
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 August 2026
Disclosure HUB
@disclosurehub · 75,034
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 19 August 2026
Reiner Fuellmich 🇺🇸/🇬🇧/🇦🇺
@ReinerFuellmichEnglish · 85,194
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Reese Report” (@gregreesevideoreports), 38,820 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gregreesevideoreports.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.