Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 92 days, net +763. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,007–41,983 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 06:27
41,151
+51
6 Nov 2026, 08:17
41,100
-25
5 Nov 2026, 10:25
41,125
-33
4 Nov 2026, 10:07
41,158
-18
3 Nov 2026, 08:20
41,176
-25
2 Nov 2026, 08:57
41,201
-23
1 Nov 2026, 08:56
41,224
-13
31 Oct 2026, 10:44
41,237
-14
30 Oct 2026, 08:31
41,251
-36
29 Oct 2026, 06:39
41,287
-48
28 Oct 2026, 01:37
41,335
-23
27 Oct 2026, 04:30
41,358
-19
26 Oct 2026, 03:29
41,377
+5
25 Oct 2026, 02:48
41,372
+20
24 Oct 2026, 05:07
41,352
-18
23 Oct 2026, 05:41
41,370
-21
22 Oct 2026, 03:39
41,391
-18
20 Oct 2026, 22:56
41,409
-17
19 Oct 2026, 20:07
41,426
-21
18 Oct 2026, 23:06
41,447
first reading
Engagement
121 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 207 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
27.5%
avg views ÷ 41,151 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,300
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 121 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
121 (4 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
452,630
Reactions total
13,381
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 08:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,890
Videos
≈594
Links
≈161
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 14s
Average length
13s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
54,468 reactions across 121 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
26,430
48.5%
🔥
6,949
12.8%
❤🔥
2,631
4.83%
🤣
2,567
4.71%
😍
2,460
4.52%
💯
1,792
3.29%
😱
1,425
2.62%
🤡
1,166
2.14%
💘
1,036
1.90%
💅
835
1.53%
🎉
700
1.29%
🥰
699
1.28%
👍
642
1.18%
🙏
632
1.16%
🗿
578
1.06%
🤯
513
0.942%
🦄
424
0.778%
🤝
376
0.69%
😁
338
0.621%
😢
322
0.591%
25 further kinds
1,953
3.59%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 121 of the 121 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54,468 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 121 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 121 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @grinulya20. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 121 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 19 of 40 posts held from the last 30 days (47.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
У меня уже едет крыша от пуховиков…
Ни с какой вещью нам не было так сложно, как с этой.
Вижу миллиард рилсов о том, что российские бренды охуели продавать пуховики по 45-50 к, НО!
Ребята, поверьте, хорошая вещь (не синтепон) так и стоит. Мой пуховик за 45 к просто шикарен. И ни на что дешевле я не соглашусь. Там только себес на тысяч 15 (материалы и работа), а кто-то хочет такой пуховик за 10 к🤡
Мы пытаемся сдел…
И минутка гордости!)😍
Наш с Мишей близкий друг
(мы знакомы 10 лет, Миша
в два раза больше) ещё год
назад открыл бутик техники
и гаджетов в самом центре Москвы!
Очень классная локация, две минуты пешком от Лубянки, отличный сервис, большой выбор техники.
При этом цена ниже, чем
в других магазинах!!
Как уже писала выше, на месте сразу мне ребята перенесли все данные, включая все недоступные приложения.
От души отр…
Этот день настал))) Мой новенький 18 про макс на терабайт 🤌🏻
Не знаю как я дотянула, состояние аккумулятора - 76%, он боролся за жизнь как мог 😅
Было забито 512 гб из 512, 2 тб айклауда, 60 к фото (нужных и тщательно отобранных, никаких скринов, неудачных кадров и
прочего мусора).
Мой капкат весит 200 гигов…
Помимо этого у меня 4 симки, десятки аккаунтов (только в телеге
их 3) и всё это занимает память и нагружае…
Второй день после запуска шуб. Уверенно двигаемся к завершению😅
Удачным решением было добавить цвет бургунди и не убирать молочный (офигенная база на зиму).
Испытываю атачекскую панику перед завтрашним днём… в чате уже раза в ~2 больше участников, чем мы отложили вещей на распродажу 👀
Начнём в ~13-14:00 примерно. Заканчиваем (по плану) 9.11 в ~18:00. Удачи нам🤪 @laconic_ru
Я - большой фанат кайфового сна и => я просто обязана рассказать вам, что у любимого Blue Sleep началась Распродажа 11.11!!!
Л У Ч Ш И Е! На их продукции спит вся наша семья, а мы затестили множество моделей!
Вот мой топ-12! Записывайте! ✍️
МАТРАСЫ!
Топ премиум вариант:
Duo Fusion (у нас 2х2!)
Бюджетнее, но тоже шикарные:
Gravity
Hybrid 2.0
Сон в невесомости:
TPE Blue Sleep Aurora
TPE Blue Sleep Eclipse
ПОДУ…
Я начала четвертый сезон!!
Смотрю Сплетницу впервые!
И как же мне зашло!)))
Я отказывала себе во всей упущенной классике нулевых,
так как считала, что в 30 лет
всё это уже не понравится,
но я ошибалась!
Теперь у меня масса планов, следующие будут Дневники Вампиров)))
1. Я совсем ничего не знала о сюжете, кроме того, что Дэн - Сплетница, а Блэр и Чак будут вместе, так что смотреть интересно вдвойне)
2. Мне заходя…
Иногда захожу на страницы блогеров, которые начинали со мной в одно время и замечаю, что больше половины из них либо забросили блоги вообще, либо стали вести их очень редко.
Причины никто не называет и мне было бы очень интересно их узнать.
Не берём в расчет то, что это очень прибыльно (даже если не вести какой-то бизнес, который продвигается через личный бренд).
Но то количество обратной связи и энергии, которую …
Ура! Запустили!
В итоге: 128 см - шоко, черный, молоко, бургунди (‼️). 88 см - шоко, черный, молоко. Дубленки
- черный ❄️
Ждём всех в @laconic_ru. Надеюсь, до 5.11 продержимся)
У меня никогда не было мысли бросить блог и я просто обожаю вести все свои соц сети ежедневно, но!
Это единственный жирный минус блогерства - когда тебя начинают учить и в чём то обвинять.
Всю прошлую неделю я читала сообщения про то, что забота о новогоднем декоре в октябре - полная херня и надо думать о другом (о чём не сказали).
Во-первых, ни разу в моей голове не было мысли из серии «о боже, нашла проблему», и…
Я ненавижу верхний свет… Вампиры, общий сбор 🧛♀️
Около миллиона рублей мы потратили на освещение и только по факту проживания поняли, что это всё было зря.
Люстры, потолочные треки, многочисленные лампочки
не включаются н и к о г д а.
Кухонные, мебельные, ночные и зеркальные подсветки юзаем постоянно. Мы очень жалеем,
что зажали деньги на подстветку
в кухонных шкафах. Её можно сделать, но это дорого. Это ещё раз …
Просили сделать такой опрос, так что публикую!)
Расскажите как дела у вашего бизнеса / компании, в которой вы работаете?
У нас / меня расклад такой:
1. Больше всего пострадала сфера рекламы. Около 30% моих заказчиков закрылись. Старички и крупные держатся и судя по всему, очень хорошо, тк рекламу стали закупать чаще.
Много новых входящих заявок, но я не хочу их брать (нет времени всё проверять). Плюс я предана св…
Шубный процесс🤌🏻 Наша Кострома❤️🔥
Через 4 дня дропаем шубы, через неделю закрытую распродажу и в декабре ждём пуховики!
Я обещала на закрытой распродаже новинки (без скидок), но кажется не успеем. Запустим отдельно, когда снизится ажиотаж❤️
@laconic_ru
🔥108❤27💘12🦄3😎3🥰2✍1🌭1
Showing the 12 most recent of 121 posts we hold for @grinulya20. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@grinulya20 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
28 September 2026
Most recent edit
28 September 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 40 posts on @grinulya20 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
2 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
45 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
13
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Дневник путешественницы @kseniamellie · 145,699 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 13 August 2026
Карина Палецких @lifekarina · 246,412 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026
МАША.СТОРИЗ @mashastories1 · 117,167 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 August 2026
MMARGO @mmargosavchuk · 116,621 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
Даша Козловская @dashakozlouskayatg · 132,737 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 August 2026
VOGUE TATTOO @voguetattoo · 19,231 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 2 October 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Grinulya” (@grinulya20), 41,151 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/grinulya20.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.