Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Prokhor Huz

Channel

Prokhor Huz

@grokhor

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17,310subscribers

-345 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001857450105
TypeChannel
Username@grokhor
Created11 December 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/grokhor

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

17,31017,65517,482.57 August 2026 — 17,655 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,651 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,642 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,623 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,607 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,599 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,589 subscribers15 August 2026 — 17,583 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,575 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,562 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,554 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,542 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,534 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,527 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,522 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,516 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,504 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,484 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,471 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,464 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,461 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,449 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,445 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,439 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,429 subscribers4 September 2026 — 17,407 subscribers7 September 2026 — 17,378 subscribers10 September 2026 — 17,346 subscribers12 September 2026 — 17,333 subscribers14 September 2026 — 17,324 subscribers16 September 2026 — 17,310 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 40 days, net -345. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,258–17,707 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 03:1817,310-14
14 Sept 2026, 07:3817,324-9
12 Sept 2026, 16:1517,333-13
10 Sept 2026, 18:5717,346-32
7 Sept 2026, 15:4017,378-29
4 Sept 2026, 18:1517,407-22
3 Sept 2026, 06:4617,429-10
2 Sept 2026, 02:3217,439-6
1 Sept 2026, 03:4517,445-4
31 Aug 2026, 00:4217,449-12
30 Aug 2026, 01:0417,461-3
28 Aug 2026, 23:4417,464-7
28 Aug 2026, 00:1317,471-13
27 Aug 2026, 03:0817,484-20
26 Aug 2026, 03:4917,504-12
25 Aug 2026, 07:0617,516-6
24 Aug 2026, 05:3817,522-5
22 Aug 2026, 10:0217,527-7
21 Aug 2026, 01:4817,534-8
20 Aug 2026, 00:1717,542first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.3%
avg views ÷ 17,310 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,940
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held26 (15 July 202627 August 2026)
Views total29,700
Reactions total960
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 02s
Average length
2m 21s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,573 reactions across 26 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,80950.6%
🔥58816.5%
😍3419.54%
😭2697.53%
❤‍🔥1393.89%
🫡1303.64%
🏆1062.97%
custom 5240363814884483705742.07%
🤝260.728%
👏250.7%
💔190.532%
👀160.448%
👍150.42%
50.14%
50.14%
🤔50.14%
🙏10.028%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,573 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC≈3,920 views183 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

121😍37❤‍🔥17🔥5🏆2💔1

Signed cryptomannn

26 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC≈4,890 views179 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😍116🔥44❤‍🔥153🏆1

Signed cryptomannn

26 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC≈5,210 views159 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

115🔥27❤‍🔥9😍7🏆1

Signed cryptomannn

25 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC≈5,380 views194 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥15033🫡9🏆2

Signed cryptomannn

17 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC≈10,300 views245 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🫡11789🔥28custom 52403638148844837056👍3🏆2

Signed cryptomannn

9 Aug 2026, 13:37 UTC≈13,500 views72 reactionsread 3 September 2026

В Варшаве в воскресенье есть мойки, которые работают?

😭56🤝74custom 52403638148844837052🏆1👍1👏1

Signed cryptomannn

7 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC≈13,900 views114 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Фулл постанова

94👀135🏆2

Signed cryptomannn

7 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC≈11,300 views103 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥918🏆2👀2

Signed cryptomannn

2 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC≈12,800 views55 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://youtu.be/J8TTEVQo8Q8?si=cQOva87i7I7M5wdW Также и с новой RS5, внешне машина выглядит привлекательно, сдержанно. По показателям аналогично M3 Touring, но даже на ней не ездив - сразу понимаешь, что будет сухой и пресный шлейф. За BMW стоит немного надуманный пацанский культ, но с точки зрения цены и финального продукта, который ты получаешь - все равно нет аналогов. По эмоциям BMW нет равных. Скорее всего э

34💔17🏆3❤‍🔥1

Signed cryptomannn

2 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC≈8,520 views42 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://youtu.be/WBO2bCg4ABo?si=w348DvqcqYC28Aat У Audi достаточно стильная новай линейка, внешне однозначно они стали выглядеть гораздо агрессивнее. SQ9 точно поставил бы выше, чем X7 и GLS. Единственное, что немного напрягает вся новая мультимедиа, которая ориентируется с китайского рынка, но в этом плане любой средний китаец будет выигрывать и уже эту гонку скорее всего не разорвать. У Audi всегда был шлейф ску

29🤝10🏆2💔1

Signed cryptomannn

1 Aug 2026, 07:36 UTC≈7,820 views213 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥13835custom 524036381488448370531❤‍🔥5😭3🏆1

Signed cryptomannn

28 Jul 2026, 12:07 UTC≈11,400 views175 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Бобби переехал жить в Киев и ставит эксперименты в офисе.

126🏆26😭20🔥21

Signed cryptomannn

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @grokhor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Prokhor Huz” (@grokhor), 17,310 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/grokhor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.