🙏Но мы хотим кричать на весь мир, на всю планету о том, что таки х, как наш Сашка, больше нет. Кричать о том, что мы бесконечно благодарны судьбе и пропавшему Павлу Рыкалову, на чей поиск он тогда вышел. Ведь именно в отряде Олифирович нашел себя, нашел свое призвание, нашел верных и настоящих братьев. 😭Когда пришли страшные новости, наш разум просто отказался в это верить. Это какая-то чудовищная ошибка. Жестокий р…

Channel
АООО ПСО "ГРОМ"
@grom_poisk
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
5,541subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001593035438 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @grom_poisk |
| Created | 13 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/grom_poisk |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 18:39 | 5,541 | -4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:36 | 5,545 | +3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 05:58 | 5,542 | +1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 08:56 | 5,541 | +17 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 5,524 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:38 | 5,531 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:44 | 5,529 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 5,533 | -8 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 5,541 | -8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 5,549 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 5,551 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:41 | 5,555 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 5,552 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 5,552 | first reading |
Engagement
33 posts held, back to 28 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 33 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
228 reactions across 22 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🙏 | 92 | 40.4% | |
| ❤ | 57 | 25.0% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 10.1% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 8.33% | |
| 😭 | 17 | 7.46% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 4.82% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 1.32% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 1.32% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.439% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.439% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.439% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 228 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 33 we hold a reading for · 3%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @grom_poisk. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 33 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 June 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Светлая память. Навсегда в строю наш брат, волонтер, воин и Герой России Александр Олифирович. 😭Иногда уходят лучшие. Те, на ком держится мир, пока мы спим, ищем и надеемся. В конце 2022 года ушел защищать интересы мирных граждан и России наш боевой товарищ, волонтер поисково-спасательного отряда «ГРОМ» г. Завитинск - Александр Вячеславович Олифирович. 🙏Он не был мобилизован. Он не искал спасения от правосудия ил…
Photo, posted without a caption
АООО ПСО «ГРОМ»: гордость отряда - это его люди! В отряд приходят люди, после общения с которыми хочется выпрямить спину и стать лучше. Наша Танечка Матюхина - именно такой человек. Юная леди, которой мы безмерно гордимся. Волонтёр Амурской областной общественной организации поисково‑спасательного отряда «ГРОМ», подразделение города Завитинска. 🫂Её история началась 5 декабря 2024 года, сразу после Дня волонтёра. Не…
Photo, posted without a caption
С сентября отряд «ГРОМ» начнет выдавать готовые бланки таких карт слушателям модуля. 🗺Нарисуйте карту его души. Куда пойдет потерявшийся человек? Туда, где билось его сердце сорок лет назад. Соберите адреса всех квартир юности, номера школ, места работы. Волонтеры будут искать его не только у вокзала, но и у стен старой библиотеки или танцплощадки. 🏷️Оставьте адрес на теле. Купите простой силиконовый браслет. Нашей…
🔥4👍3
Проект «БезопасностьВДеталях». Тихая осень. Память, деменция и как не потерять родного человека до того, как он потеряется сам. 👨👩👦👦 Есть темы, на которые мы молчим за семейным столом. Мы смеемся над дачными историями и успехами внуков, но отводим глаза, когда дедушка второй раз спрашивает, какой сегодня день. Потеря памяти пугает нас до дрожи - это кража человека при его жизни. 📈 Статистика отряда «ГРОМ» послед…
🔥5👍1🤯1
Photo, posted without a caption
‼️Поиск человека это дисциплина, единый центр управления. Всё остальное - игра в героев, цена которой - ЧЕЛОВЕЧЕСКАЯ ЖИЗНЬ. 🙏Берегите себя, своих близких и доверяйте только профессионалам. Никогда #не_теряйтесь. С уважением, команда АООО ПСО «ГРОМ».
❤6👍3🤯1
ОСТОРОЖНО: ЛЖЕКИНОЛОГИ. Как необученные собаки убивают шансы на спасение? ‼️Мы хотим жестко и предельно честно поговорить о том, что происходит за кулисами поисковых операций - это не только промокшие ботинки, бессонница и комары. Это еще и системный саботаж под видом помощи. 📢В поиске Василия Михайловича мы столкнулись с этим в лоб. В критически важные дни, когда жизнь пропавшего сохранна, к нам приехали они. Сотр…
❤10👍5👌1🤯1😁1
Photo, posted without a caption
🛑 ШЕСТОПАЛОВ ВЛАДИМИР ВИКТОРОВИЧ НАЙДЕН/ЖИВ! 🛑 https://t.me/grom_poisk https://max.ru/c/-69294743874131/AZ8n88JbSjo ✍️ В настоящее время жизни и здоровью Владимира Викторовича ничего не угрожает! 💛 Благодарим КАЖДОГО, кто участвовал — делился постами, собирал информацию, Спасибо вам большое! 🙏 👉 Берегите себя и своих близких и никогда, слышите, никогда #не_теряйтесь! С уважением и заботой о Вас, команда АООО ПС…
❤7👍3🙏2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @grom_poisk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@grom_poisk named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 12 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“АООО ПСО "ГРОМ"” (@grom_poisk), 5,541 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/grom_poisk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.