Channel
@gtqny
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,325subscribers
-132 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003953676617 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gtqny |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 5 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gtqny |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 04:59 | 2,325 | -5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 17:21 | 2,330 | -13 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 06:41 | 2,343 | -21 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 18:01 | 2,364 | -13 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 2,377 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:53 | 2,384 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 2,390 | -22 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 2,412 | -10 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 2,422 | -13 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 2,435 | -12 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:24 | 2,447 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 2,452 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:56 | 2,459 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 2,457 | first reading |
40 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 40 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
27 reactions across 26 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 27 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
‼️苏丹互推团队 ‼️打造全网最牛逼互推有频道就可以参与 本人承诺只互推绝不打广 本人频道 苏丹数据号通知频道 1️⃣苏丹数据号通知频道 2️⃣权的朋友圈 3️⃣苏丹高速代理频道 4️⃣GTQ直装 5️⃣和平落叶直装 6️⃣G3直装频道 7️⃣杀荣の封号小窝 8️⃣久火的主频道 9️⃣花海低价TG号 给我一个管理员还你一个全新的频道 ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
Signed 苏丹(互推dd) ❄️
This message couldn't be displayed on your device because it violates the Telegram Terms of Service.
👍1
Signed 久火
此频道已被我预告
👍2
Signed 久火
🉑
Signed 7891
https://t.me/xxjdzbot?start=ref_8399018632 免费假地机器人
👍1
此频道已转让加入我的新频道
Signed 7891
你真的退网了吗
👍1
Signed 久火
Sticker, posted without a caption
👍1
Signed 小舞
燕子能再来，是因为巢还在；杨柳能再青，是因为根还在。可我身体里的那团火，烧过最旺的一阵，剩下的炭早就凉透了。再点，也不是当年的温度了。花有重开日，激情无再少年。那股劲，永远留在了二十岁的风里。
👍1
Signed 久火
2️⃣0️⃣2️⃣6️⃣年8️⃣月最新直装 😃和平精英公益稳定直装已更新 我们联合了各大频道主制作此项目 点击下方蓝色链接/按钮完成验证 --------------------------- 点我完成验证立即使用稳定直装 点我完成验证立即使用稳定直装 点我完成验证立即使用稳定直装 --------------------------- 🔥项目合作联系 @c585i
👍1
Signed 程霜
庆祝频道人数2k 给大家发一个红包
Signed 实名 八弟
💰 转账给你 23.89 U 请在24小时内领取
Signed 实名 八弟
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @gtqny. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@gtqny named 7 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“和平精英落叶直装” (@gtqny), 2,325 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gtqny.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.