Channel
@guapfloww
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
361subscribers
+27 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003506955831 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @guapfloww |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/guapfloww |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 361 | +13 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 348 | +13 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:23 | 335 | -5 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:58 | 340 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 335 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 334 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 334 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 7 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
20 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 75.0% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 15.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 5.00% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 5.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Итоги недели В начале недели чуть раздал ,но под конец недели, а так же под переход месяца появился актив, куча пробоев на которых основной профит и еще было несколько отскоков от сайзов 215$ с кб
❤5🔥2
Образцовая🤪
❤3😁1
Итоги месяца не утешительные.. В прошлом месяце я сильно налосил в начале и в итоге вышел в неплохой для меня + и был ебануто рад от всей этой ситуации, в этом же месяце я как будто боролся чтоб не на въебывать, постоянно раздавал и отбивался видно на комуле, очень тяжелый месяц в эмоциональном плане с таким то качелями не удивительно. Радует что в итоге с кешбэком у меня в +120$
❤5👍1
Проспал пол дня, думал уже ничего не будет, но в итоге сегодня достаточно активно
🔥1
Wwf. Медиа: Scalping Gym Merlody Scalp dream dealer PROFIT ORB Exewing Scalp Director scalp rain trade Scalp Time lobzik 道 Warden da ya ebal DrTrade Mikhail Nikolaevich proshyq Scalp R Scalping N Потужный Скальпинг Impossible Guap flow Fat scalp boolshayacel СК
Тихо, не спеша
Тяжелая неделька, с кэшем -25 На выходных получилось отбить большую часть убытков, еще бы эфир пробил когда надо и мог бы закрыть в небольшой +, в целом основные профиты на пробоях и отскоках
Очередные итоги недели С кешбэком +-250💵 Вообще с кайфом закрыл неделю если бы не проебался в двух сетапах мог бы закрывать на изи 300, но в целом довольствуемся чем можем В основном было достаточно много пробоев на них основной профит
Первый месяц в команде и в классике, очень насыщенно получилось, много чего видел в первые. В первой половине месяца понараздавал, заходил сразу на повышенные, в итоге оставшуюся часть месяца контролировал риски и пытался отбить, что в целом успешно получилось, рассчитывал закрыть месяц в ноль но получилось даже в + Месяц с учетом кешбэка 300$ По поводу мекса, решил полностью от него отказаться, считаю что хватит …
❤2
Ну вот первая хорошая неделя в +, торговал пробои, отскоки и пару темок. Буду публиковать какие то сделки по среди недели мб
По итогам прошлой недели я закрыл ее в плюс, на раздавал в начале потом потихоньку все отбил, по тихонько познаю бинанс По неликам чет вообще тухло было гонялы на kucoin, но в итоге я там раздал немного и на этом все
Моя неделя в попытках торговать классику закрывается в -250, подбивает сильно конечно, но я сейчас торгую в стаке и пытаюсь влиться в торговлю думаю дальше будет намного лучше, темки на нелик биржах никуда не денутся
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @guapfloww. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@guapfloww named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Guap Flow” (@guapfloww), 361 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/guapfloww.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.