Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for EVENT-'🍷⁠*⁠.⁠✧𝙂𝙪𝙚𝙨𝙩 666 💋ྀིྀི

Channel

EVENT-'🍷⁠*⁠.⁠✧𝙂𝙪𝙚𝙨𝙩 666 💋ྀིྀི

@guest666_Force

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

31subscribers

+28 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004381697186
TypeChannel
Username@guest666_Force
Created20 August 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded21 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/guest666_Force

Growth

3311721 August 2026 — 3 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13 subscribers30 August 2026 — 30 subscribers7 September 2026 — 31 subscribers21 August 20267 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net +28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 07:5731+1
30 Aug 2026, 13:5530+17
22 Aug 2026, 18:5813+10
21 Aug 2026, 13:003first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.7%
avg views ÷ 31 subscribers
Avg views / post
6.1
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held20 (20 August 202621 August 2026)
Views total116
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken21 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC2 viewsread 21 August 2026
Forwarded from @the1x1x1x1blogPhoto

[ 16-18+! Блог сделан по комиксу с Doublezipper.] ˚₊·͟͟͟͟͟͟͞͞͞͞͞͞ ꒰ 1𝑥1𝑥1𝑥1 ⁱˢ ᵗʸᵖⁱⁿᵍ··· ꒱ | ೃ࿔₊• — ∫ℏ€ᖱ↳€†∫ϰ️⚧ ❡✺♗♫❡ †✺ ᖱ♗€! — Ⰽᛠ0 Ʒ4 ᛈᚴᚡ3ᛈᛠᛒ0 ᚢ0ᛈᛖ3ᚳ0 ᛒ0ᛪᛠᚺ ᛒ ᛖ0ᛪ ƃᚳ0ᛚ?.. 4ᚹᛚ, ᚳ4ᚦᚺ0.. 0ᛈᛠ4ᛒ4ᛪᛈᚱ Ʒᚦ3ᛈᚦ, ᛯ3ᚹᛠᛒ4 4ƃ0ᚹᛠ4. — Чт0 з4 сущ3ств0 п0см3л0 в0йтN в м0й бл0г?.. 4рг, л4дн0.. 0ст4в4йсR зд3сь, ж3ртв4 4б0рт4. — Ⲭⲟⲧⲉⲗυ ⳝы ⲡⲟⲥⲉⲧυⲧь ⳝⲗⲟⲅ ⲥⲩⳃⲉⲥⲧⲃⲁ ⲏⲉⲏⲁⲃυⲥⲧυ, ⲃыⳝⲣⲁⲃⲱⲉⲅⲟⲥя υⳅ ⲟⲕⲟⲃ? Ⲧⲟⲅⲇⲁ ⲃⲁⲙ ⲕ ⲏ

21 Aug 2026, 12:28 UTC5 viewsread 21 August 2026
Forwarded from @Boris_BloPhoto

🤍 -Ну почему нет Блога с 𝕊𝕠𝕝𝕕𝕚𝕖 Форсакен ? 🤩 Знакомо? Тогда вы по адресу! Этот блог посвещен soldier! 🤍🤍 Так что прятного вам посещения здесь🤍 🤩Почта Солдата Данный канал Саппорта — Здесь

21 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC6 viewsread 21 August 2026
Photo

🦋🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🦋🦋 Мне нужна твоя КРОВЬ! 1х1х1х1 — здравствуйте, 1х4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @guest666_Force. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“EVENT-'🍷⁠*⁠.⁠✧𝙂𝙪𝙚𝙨𝙩 666 💋ྀིྀི” (@guest666_Force), 31 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/guest666_Force.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.