Channel

هدایت ملحدین|𝑮𝒖𝒊𝒅𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒂𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒔

@guidingatheists

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

232subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1003157127909
Type	Channel
Username	@guidingatheists
Created	Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	9 August 2026
Last confirmed live	18 September 2026
Measurements held	7
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegram	t.me/guidingatheists

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7 measurements spanning 40 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 221–245 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
18 Sept 2026, 09:42	232	-8
9 Sept 2026, 17:37	240	-2
31 Aug 2026, 05:04	242	+1
24 Aug 2026, 00:17	241	+5
16 Aug 2026, 18:19	236	+11
9 Aug 2026, 23:32	225	+1
9 Aug 2026, 15:31	224	first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

33 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
❤	26	78.8%
👍	4	12.1%
💯	2	6.06%
🤔	1	3.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC89 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Photo

عموماً، این کانال به مطالب ایران باستان نمی‌پردازد، اما این پست در نوع خود بسیار جالب است. زمان‌پریشی فاحش جهت خلق نمایی خارق‌العاده از چیزی که بر فرض صحت نهایتاً امری طبیعی در زمان خود می‌بود، و جالب‌تر، حجم واکنش به پست در یک ساعت توسط حدوداً ۴٪ از اعضای کانال می‌باشد! اول، طبق کدام سند موثق و رسمی، هخامنشیان بر نصف جمعیت جهان سیطره داشتند؟ وضوح بطلان این آمار از اینروست که، مثلاً، خلافت اسلامی، با وجود وسعتی معادل…

❤2👍2

Signed ƒєx

3 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC110 views0 reactionsread 9 August 2026

✍ How establishing justice in the afterlife is of any use to the victim in this life? This question is based entirerly on the premise that the delay in establishing justice renders it futile. Assuming this premise is true: i. We should shut the doors of courts, for no criminal case concludes immediately, and delays, ranging from a few hours to even several years, is inevitable. ii. If such delays are inevitable, ho…

Signed Fєх

1 Aug 2026, 21:36 UTC234 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

✍ برقراری عدالت در آن دنیا چه سودی برای مظلوم در‌ این دنیا دارد؟ این شبهه تماماً بر فرضِ درستیِ این ادعا متکی است که تأخیر در برقراری عدالت، آن را بی‌فایده می‌کند. اگر بر فرض قبول همین ادعا پیش رویم: اول، باید درِ دادگاه ها را بست، زیرا فرآیند رسیدگی به هیچ جرمی بلافاصله به اتمام نمی‌رسد و تأخیر از چند ساعت تا حتی چند سال اجتناب‌ناپذیر است. دوم، وقتی تأخیر در رسیدگی به جرایم اجتناب‌ناپذیر است، ادعای اینکه تأخیر در …

❤3💯1

Signed Fєх

29 Jul 2026, 13:08 UTC147 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

✍️ Did Prophet Muhammad ﷺ plagiarized his information from previous sources? => By 'information' in this article, we refer to that which the Prophet ﷺ couldn't find out merely through reflection, contemplation, analysis and the available tools of his time, such as news of unseen and precise scientific information. => There is no justifying historical report showing that the Prophet ﷺ used to take any such informatio…

❤2💯1

Signed Fex

28 Jul 2026, 08:49 UTC264 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

✍️ آیا پیامبر ﷺ از منابع پیشین اطلاعات خود را اخذ می‌کردند؟ => منظور از اطلاعات مورد بحث در این نوشتار، اطلاعاتی است که پیامبر ﷺ با مجرد تفکر، تعمق، تحلیل و ابزار موجود در زمان خود نمی‌توانست بدان پی ببرد، همچون اخبار غیبی و علمی دقیق. => هیچ گزارش موجه تاریخی وجود ندارد که ثابت کند پیامبر ﷺ از افراد یا اسناد و مدارکِ پیشینی، اطلاعاتی دال بر این اخبار دریافت کرده باشند و تنها گزارش مورد استناد، صِرف ملاقات یا برخورد…

❤4🤔1

Signed Fex

26 Jul 2026, 15:58 UTC188 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

✍️ Are there authentic historical proofs for the splitting of the moon by Prophet Muhammad ﷺ? Is an authentic historical proof anything other than an authentic report or an archeological discovery? In truth, for this miraculous event, we have both types of proofs: First proof: Mass-transmitted Quranic texts and reported narrations from the Prophet ﷺ. Given the popularity of these texts and reports, we won't cite an…

❤1

Signed Fex

25 Jul 2026, 12:43 UTC265 viewsread 9 August 2026

✍️ آیا دلیل تاریخی موثقی برای دو نیم شدن ماه توسط پیامبر اسلام ﷺ وجود دارد؟ دلیل تاریخی موثق چیست؟ غیر این است که این دلیل، یا خبر موثقی است که نقل می‌شود یا یافته‌های باستان‌شناسی است که کاوش می‌گردد؟ در حقیقت برای این رخداد خارق‌العاده ما هر دو دست از دلایل را داریم. دلیل نخست: تواتر نص قرآن و احادیث منقول از پیامبر ﷺ. به دلیل شهرت این نصوص نیازی به ذکر این موارد نیست. اعتراض معمولی که پیش می‌آید این است که آیا ن…

Signed Fex

24 Jul 2026, 14:23 UTC165 viewsread 9 August 2026

✍️ Apostasy and Its Punishment in Islam in Light of the Concepts of "Murtadd (Apostate) and Munafiq (Hypocrite)": Legally speaking, an apostate is worse than the original disbeliever in Islam, for an apostate has no choice but Islam or the sword. Eschatologically speaking as well, the punishment for a hypocrite is graver than that of an original disbeliever, as they dwell in the lowest depth of the Fire. The aposta…

Signed Fex

22 Jul 2026, 15:59 UTC180 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

✍️ ارتداد و مجازات آن در اسلام در پرتو مفاهیم «مرتد و منافق»: از نظر حقوقی، در اسلام، مرتد بدتر از کافر اصلی است، زیرا جز اسلام یا شمشیر انتخاب دیگری ندارد. از نظر اخروی نیز عذاب منافق شدیدتر از کافر اصلی است و در پایین‌ترین نقطه از آتش است. مرتد و منافق در کفر باطنی برابر بوده ولی در کفر ظاهری متفاوتند. در‌ واقع کفری که ظاهر نشده است، به مرحله ارتداد نرسیده و در مرحله نفاق باقی می‌ماند. چه بسا، منافقانی که در مجال…

👍1

Signed Fex

22 Jul 2026, 12:13 UTC139 viewsread 9 August 2026

File

✍️ Title: Apostasy in Islam This article offers a concise yet comprehensive examination of apostasy (riddah) from the standpoint of Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh), addressing and clarifying the prevalent misconceptions surrounding the issue in a compact format. Author: Admin of Guiding Atheists' Channel (Fex) Number of pages: 4 pages.

Signed Fex

22 Jul 2026, 06:21 UTC220 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

File

✍️ عنوان مقاله: ارتداد در اسلام این مقاله به طور مختصر و جامع به موضوع ارتداد از دید و منظر فقه اسلامی و رفع شبهات و کج‌فهمی‌های پیرامون آن به‌طور کم حجم و فشرده می‌پردازد. نویسنده: مدیریت کانال هدایت ملحدین (Fex) تعداد صفحات: 4 صفحه

❤1

Signed Fex

21 Jul 2026, 20:48 UTCviews —

هدایت ملحدین|𝑮𝒖𝒊𝒅𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒂𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒔 pinned «📚 مطالب ڪانال هــدایــت ملحدیــن: 📂 شبهات پیرامون خداوند: ▫️برهان شر و عذاب همیشگی در آتش جهنم ▫️استدلال قرآنی و فلسفی در اثبات وجود خداوند: مقاله.pdf ▫️برهان وابستگی در اثبات وجود خداوند: مقاله.pdf ▫️چرا خداوند میخواهد او را عبادت کنیم؟ 📂 شبهات پیرامون…»

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @guidingatheists. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

آنتی شبهات
@anti_shobahat · 17,2673 posts

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“هدایت ملحدین|𝑮𝒖𝒊𝒅𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒂𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒔” (@guidingatheists), 232 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/guidingatheists.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.