Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
21 measurements spanning 86 days, net -65. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,724–6,809 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
1 Nov 2026, 02:54
6,734
-3
28 Oct 2026, 21:56
6,737
-1
25 Oct 2026, 22:18
6,738
-1
23 Oct 2026, 04:09
6,739
-3
19 Oct 2026, 18:59
6,742
-3
17 Oct 2026, 00:17
6,745
-7
13 Oct 2026, 21:26
6,752
-3
8 Oct 2026, 14:22
6,755
-10
26 Sept 2026, 13:16
6,765
-5
17 Sept 2026, 16:58
6,770
-8
13 Sept 2026, 14:36
6,778
-5
9 Sept 2026, 15:39
6,783
-2
4 Sept 2026, 09:38
6,785
-2
31 Aug 2026, 17:36
6,787
-5
28 Aug 2026, 20:06
6,792
-1
25 Aug 2026, 14:02
6,793
-2
22 Aug 2026, 21:24
6,795
-1
19 Aug 2026, 11:27
6,796
-2
10 Aug 2026, 11:35
6,798
-1
7 Aug 2026, 05:15
6,799
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 10 April 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 May 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 17s
Average length
34s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,255 reactions across 14 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,241
42.6%
🔥
588
11.2%
🥰
529
10.1%
❤
423
8.05%
😁
364
6.93%
🤯
321
6.11%
🤔
248
4.72%
🤬
196
3.73%
🤮
102
1.94%
😱
83
1.58%
🎉
73
1.39%
👎
39
0.742%
👏
26
0.495%
💩
15
0.285%
🖕
6
0.114%
😢
1
0.019%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,255 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2022 to 15 May 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всегда, когда мне что-то хочется сделать в финансовом плане, я понимаю, что в конечном итоге я это хочу сделать потому, что конъюнктура на рынке такая и меня к этому психологически подталкивает всё происходящее в данный отрезок времени.
И анализируя прошлое, я понимаю, что чаще всего эту конъюнктуру создавало государство и цб в частности своими заявлениями.
И как показывает опять же опыт, делать-то как раз надо был…
Коротко о том, как проходило наше застолье в этот светлый день!
Этих детей надо слушать😂
А вообще, от всей души поздравляю вас с Днем Победы в Великой Отечественной войне!
https://youtu.be/FqAWRuVUtA0
Категорически советую достаточно легкое и просто для понимания видео о глобальных процессах в мире и мировой истории о смене сверхдержав, их жизненном цикле, причинах и пути роста и упадка.
И да, там ни слова ни о России, ни об Украине. Видео вообще не об этом😊
Но действительно очень интересное и полезное😉
Давно такого бреда не смотрел😅
Если собираетесь с детьми в кино - не тратьте время🙈
Хотя может детям и понравится…
Но вообще конечно тот еще мультик🥴🥴🥴
Будет грустно, если нам теперь будут доступны мультики только такого качества😬🙈
Неплохой выпуск у «Редакции» про Иран и то, как там живут люди в условиях санкций и эмбарго на протяжении уже 40 лет.
Выводы и краткое содержание писать не буду, выпуск действительно стоит того, чтобы посмотреть😉
https://youtu.be/W4keR51qGBs
Как вам такие сообщения у меня директе?!
Что думаете?🥴
Я даже не знаю, как реагировать…
Можете мне попробовать объяснить, что желать смерти детям это нормально.
И всё же, я так и не понял, почему пограничники с о.Змеиный, которые без единого выстрела сдались в плен, национальные герои?!
Где в этом логика…?!
Ладно бы они мужественно сражались до конца и пали смертью храбрых и тд и тп как в лучших голливудских фильмах, но просто сложить оружие, сдаться и стать национальными герями…
Чего-то я не понимаю в этой жизни…
Вообще все последние посты полны непонимания😅🙈
Я так и не понял…
Комаровский же сейчас всё отрицает, а до начала событий открыто заявлял о «самой страшной болезни своей страны»🤔
И значит оно там всё таки было?!
И лозунги не выдуманные?!
И идеология была оказывается?!
Это мастерство переобувания что ли?!
Очень интересно, но ничего не понятно…
😁195👍92🤔51🤯19👎8❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @guild_invest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2022 to 15 May 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Papasha_blog” (@guild_invest), 6,734 subscribers as measured 1 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/guild_invest.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.