Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Гусельников | Расследования и портреты

Channel

Гусельников | Расследования и портреты

@guselandrei

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,984subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001318632692
TypeChannel
Username@guselandrei
Created16 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/guselandrei

Growth

6,9626,9936,977.55 August 2026 — 6,984 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,984 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,987 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,992 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,989 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,981 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,962 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,972 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,993 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,984 subscribers6,9845 August 20261 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 27 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,957–6,998 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 23:346,984-9
30 Aug 2026, 06:086,993+21
26 Aug 2026, 21:346,972+10
23 Aug 2026, 12:126,962-19
19 Aug 2026, 13:426,981-8
12 Aug 2026, 16:246,989-3
9 Aug 2026, 21:176,992+5
6 Aug 2026, 13:356,987+3
6 Aug 2026, 03:176,984no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:526,984first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 25 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.50%
avg views ÷ 6,984 subscribers
Avg views / post
663
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held10 (25 June 202613 August 2026)
Views total1,990
Reactions total83
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 03:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
46m 47s
Average length
5m 51s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

252 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10140.1%
🙏6927.4%
👍4718.7%
🔥239.13%
👏31.19%
😭31.19%
💯20.794%
🤡20.794%
🥱10.397%
🫡10.397%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 252 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC281 views37 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @urallivePhoto

60-летний штурмовик сбил 30 вражеских FPV-дронов. И две «Бабы-Яги» А его сын отвёз на фронт десятки гуманитарных конвоев Вот она — связь фронта и тыла! 57-летний боец с позывным Штурман с 2024-го года воюет на фронте. Штурмовиком! Был на самых жарких направлениях, в том числе — под Покровском. — Все задачи выполнял, заднюю не давал нигде. Первое ранение получил в декабре 2024-го: выдвигались на закреп, прилетела «

17🙏12👍5🔥3

13 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC279 views10 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Обещанный сюжет про 60-летнего штурмовика, который сбил 30 вражеских дронов

👍4🙏42

12 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC≈1,430 views36 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Друзья, скоро опубликую очередной сюжет из серии «Человек-судьба». Интервью с волонтёром по имени Артём, который активно помогает фронту: на его счету — десятки конвоев в зону в СВО, переданные бойцам УАЗики и множество другой техники (хотя парень вовсе не бизнесмен!). Но главный герой сюжета… (внезапно) не он: сын рассказывает о своем отце с позывным Штурман. Тому почти 60 лет (если быть точным — 57), и с 24-го год

21🔥6🙏6👍3

5 Aug 2026, 09:53 UTC510 views27 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @obraya_zemlyaVideo

Временные и Постоянные. Диагноз пятого года СВО... Однажды боец там, где тишина дороже золота, сказал фразу, которая расставила всё по местам. Он не философствовал — он просто констатировал факт, ставший диагнозом всему нашему обществу. Он сказал: «Есть временные люди, а есть настоящие. Постоянные». Пятый год идёт специальная военная операция. Пятый год льётся кровь. И именно пятый год, как проявитель на плёнке, пр

16🙏9💯1🥱1

4 Aug 2026, 13:34 UTC470 views8 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Poll

Друзья, готовлю к публикации сюжет про самый необычный, на мой взгляд, род войск. Угадайте, про какой?

  1. РВСН — ракетные войска стратегического назначения9%
  2. Стройбат50%
  3. Железнодорожные войска28%
  4. Военно-космические силы14%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍6🙏2

31 Jul 2026, 08:51 UTC≈7,190 views36 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

В Екатеринбурге простились с экс-руководителем Союза добровольцев Донбасса на Урале Максимом Хлопиным Всегда трудно провожать в последний путь бойцов, которых ты знал. А тут — особый случай: в Екатеринбурге простились с бывшим руководителем Союза добровольцев Донбасса на Урале Максимом Хлопиным. — Максим — это была величина! — сказал на похоронах его тезка из НКО «СМЕРШ». — Были люди (среди ветеранов боевых действи

🙏238😭3🔥1🫡1

24 Jul 2026, 17:26 UTC641 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @uralliveVideo

«Колибрик»: уралочка, потерявшая на СВО близкого человека, подняла на помощь фронту целый город. ФИЛЬМ В городе Березовский (спутник Екатеринбурга) работает мощная волонтёрская группа. В помощь фронту включены все, от мала до велика: школьники, спортсмены, работники организаций и бюджетных учреждений, люди с инвалидностью. Все они — участники волонтёрского объединения «Сила единства! СВОих не бросаем!» (г. Березов

12🙏8👍3🔥3💯1🤡1

24 Jul 2026, 06:04 UTC≈4,250 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

На свой День рождения решил сделать себе необычный подарок — опубликовать фильм про уральских волонтёров. Работал над ним долго, но он стоил того! Ведь он — про людей, которые не просто от всей души и изо всех сил помогают фронту — своим рвением они изменили жизнь целого города! Как всегда, за созданием волонтёрского объединения стоит личная истории руководителя: в 2022-м у Надежды Мельник (её позывной — Колибрик) н

17👍8🙏2🔥1🤡1

27 Jun 2026, 06:27 UTC864 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @uralliveVideo

Военкоры УРАЛLIVE Андрей Гусельников и Евгений Малёнкин снялись в клипе на песню «Прямой эфир» группы «Черные береты» Съемки прошли во время смены юных военкоров в Центре патриотического воспитания «Авангард» Челябинской области. — Клип сделали сами дети! Мы лишь выполняли то, что нас просили во время съёмок (ну ещё поделились архивными кадрами и творчески включились в процесс). Но сама идея, креатив на съёмках, мо

👍12🔥75👏2🙏2

25 Jun 2026, 12:17 UTC≈2,060 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Были юнкоры — стали военкоры Как на Урале готовят будущих Симоновых, Полевых, Пеговых, Поддубных… Вместе с моим другом и соратником Евгением Малёнкиным провели двухдневный мастер-класс на смене юных военкоров в центре «Авангард» — главном (и мощнейшем!) центре военно-патриотической подготовки в Челябинской области. До сих пор под впечатлением от того драйва, той атмосферы, которая царит на этих сборах! Дети просто

👍63🔥2👏1🙏1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @guselandrei. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 13:34 UTCAnonymous Poll74 voters

Друзья, готовлю к публикации сюжет про самый необычный, на мой взгляд, род войск. Угадайте, про какой?

  1. РВСН — ракетные войска стратегического назначения9%
  2. Стройбат50%
  3. Железнодорожные войска28%
  4. Военно-космические силы14%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 13 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Новости Шеремета 9½
@TauNewsEkb · 33,904
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Гусельников | Расследования и портреты” (@guselandrei), 6,984 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/guselandrei.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.