Channel
@gusetik
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
473subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001157547779 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gusetik |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gusetik |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 473 | -3 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 00:16 | 476 | -7 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 483 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:49 | 482 | -4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 486 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:11 | 487 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 488 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 488 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
88 reactions across 11 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 47 | 53.4% | |
| 🐳 | 9 | 10.2% | |
| 🙈 | 8 | 9.09% | |
| 👾 | 5 | 5.68% | |
| 🦄 | 5 | 5.68% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 4.55% | |
| 👻 | 2 | 2.27% | |
| 💊 | 2 | 2.27% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 2.27% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 1.14% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 1.14% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 1.14% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 1.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Делюсь отзывом спустя месяц использования этого автозагара. Кажется, это лучшее, что я пробовала среди всех автозагаров. Он действительно долго носится: обновляю его примерно раз в неделю. Да, на 5–6-й день начинает немного плешивить в зоне подмышек, но, это нормально практически для любого автозагара. Производитель обещает, что запаха нет. Ну… пиздеж. 😄 Запах есть, просто он очень лёгкий и ненавязчивый. Мужик вооб…
❤5
Photo, posted without a caption
❤4
Вчера были на др, катались на гидриках. Я, кстати, не умею плавать (говорит сертифицированный дайвер💅) Никитос перевернулся со мной в воду, я наглоталась воды. Сегодня вайб обсирательный 🪄
Я снова бросаю курить) уже на опыте, это мой 6й раз🤣 каждый раз избавляюсь от сильной зависимости и начинаю снова. Ну очень я люблю курить. Зависимой не люблю быть. Поэтому, когда ощущаю что меня несет, сразу обрубаю.
❤2💊2👀1🤨1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤7😐1
Не могу записаться на лазер, потому что меня заебали вопросами
🙈6🤣2❤1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤10👎4🙈2
Такая она мадам 🤍
❤8
Video message, posted without a caption
🐳3👻2🦄2❤1🤗1
Ну довольно деликатненько, но негром стать не удалось После/до
❤6🐳6🦄3👾2
Ну, результат такой! Цвет не сильно автозагарно рыжий, не воняет, посмотрим как будет в носке St moris давай более темный цвет мне кажется
❤3
Про автозагары Я достаточно опытный юзер автозагаров, долгие годы пользовалась всеми известным St.Moris, потом открыла неплохой и бюджетный от Dove. Мимо дела пробовала капли от Clarins. В целом, все они неплохие, но дают рыжину и сходят абсолютно все криво-косо, и достаточно проблематично полностью снять старое покрытие, чтобы нанести свежее. Те, у кого по отзывам они сходят равномерно, обновляют раз в 4 дня и вс…
👾3
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @gusetik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Настя Майер” (@gusetik), 473 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gusetik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.