حمایت اختیاری👇 t.me/hadirasuli1/319
❤588👍99🕊65😍50👏31😭2

Channel
@hadirasuli1
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
32,893subscribers
+896 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001813568553 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hadirasuli1 |
| Description | ✅ تنها کانال رسمی هادی رسولی در تلگرام ✅ خودشناسی باطنی |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hadirasuli1 |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
23,100 average views per post against 32,829 subscribers — an engagement rate of 70.4%. Across the 3,428 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,635–99,960 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 2.07% and 10.9%, with a median of 5.08%.
| Window | 30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 15 of 17 published in the window (0 exact, 15 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 346,850 |
| Mature posts only | 73.9% over 14 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 32,829 measured 4 November 2026 |
| Cohort | b31623:fas · 3,428 channels · p10 0.723% · p25 2.07% · p50 5.08% · p75 10.9% · p90 20.5% |
| Position in cohort | 99.212th percentile · 13.9× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.03% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Persian · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 16:05 | 32,893 | +64 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 18:28 | 32,829 | +22 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 21:27 | 32,807 | +45 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 20:30 | 32,762 | +10 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:48 | 32,752 | +17 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 18:30 | 32,735 | +3 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 21:49 | 32,732 | +15 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 22:09 | 32,717 | +27 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 18:41 | 32,690 | +9 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 16:00 | 32,681 | +8 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 18:11 | 32,673 | -5 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:16 | 32,678 | +9 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 14:41 | 32,669 | +13 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 17:01 | 32,656 | +2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 18:47 | 32,654 | +15 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 13:39 | 32,639 | -3 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 09:06 | 32,642 | +12 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 07:36 | 32,630 | +13 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 05:57 | 32,617 | +16 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 06:16 | 32,601 | first reading |
59 posts held, back to 27 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 158 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 59 (27 May 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 291,500 |
| Reactions total | 25,594 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 07:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
67,135 reactions across 50 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😍 | 43,872 | 65.3% | |
| 👍 | 20,761 | 30.9% | |
| 😭 | 1,210 | 1.80% | |
| ❤ | 1,116 | 1.66% | |
| 🕊 | 108 | 0.161% | |
| 👏 | 68 | 0.101% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67,135 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hadirasuli1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 59 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 May 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (60.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
حمایت اختیاری👇 t.me/hadirasuli1/319
❤588👍99🕊65😍50👏31😭2
پس از انتشار این فایل تصویری عده زیادی از اعضای محترم ابراز لطف کردند. خداوند رو بابت این تحول درونی شاکرم. قبلا هم خدمتتون عرض کردم. این فایل تصویری باید بارها و بارها در سکوت و تمرکز عمیق دیده بشه. با یاری الهی ، جهت تعالی درونی و آرامش عمیق روحی شما باز هم پادکست تولید میکنیم🌹
😍560❤355👍111👏37🕊30😭13
شاید بعد از درک عمیق این کلمات ، دیگر آدم سابق نباشید💚 🔷 چشماتون رو ببندید و حس کنید تمام این جملات رو خودتون دارید به خودتون میگید. سپس درونا به تک تک این بیت ها عمل کنید. 🔶 با روحتون بشنوید و خودتون رو برای همیشه ببخشید💚 دوستتون دارم🌹 ✍ هادی رسولی
😍1,160👍409😭140❤66🕊13
دوستان بزرگوارم سعی کنید نسبت به پست ها واکنش نشون بدید. هر لایکی که میکنید یا هر ایموجی که زیر پست ها میزنید ، الگوریتم تلگرام بگونه ای هست که بر اساس تعداد این ایموجی ها اون پست رو بصورت خودکار بعنوان تبلیغ رایگان در کانال های مختلف ، بیشتر نشون میده. هر واکنشی که نسبت به پست ها نشون می دید به دیده شدن و انتشار این آگاهی ها کمک میکنید. بنابراین سعی کنید فقط به دیدن یا خواندن پست ها اکتفا نکنید. پست قبلی رو با…
😍2,120👍1,250❤55😭42
🔷 ژرفای تاریکی 🔷 این همان راز عظیم است... 🔶 در این چند هفته اخیر تلاش بسیاری کردیم تا آموزه های ذکر شده در این فایل تصویری ، آنچه باشد که از قلب حقایق عرفانی برخیزد. امید است توجه به محتوای ژرف آن ، تمام گره های کور ذهن شما را باز کرده و دروازه جدیدی از زندگی را به روی قلبتان بگشاید. با هنذفری ، در نهایت سکوت و تمرکز بارها ببینید و به یکبار دیدن آن اکتفا نکنید. 🔷 با تشکر از دکتر مهرپور عزیز که وقت گرانبهایشا…
😍2,100👍951😭100❤38
دوستان عزیز و محترمی که میپرسند ادمین کانال چه کسی هست و اگر با آقای رسولی کار داشتیم به کدام آیدی پیام بدیم؟ پاسخ : بیش از یکساله که کانال رسمی مون هیچ ادمینی نداره. و ادمین قبلی به دلایل شغلی حدود یکسالی میشه که همکاری شون با ما تمام شده. تنها ادمینی که اکنون داریم ، ادمین ثبت نام مجموعه جلساتمون هست که فعلا فرصتی برای ادمینی کانال رسمی ندارند و درگیر مسئولیت های خودشون بعنوان ادمین ثبت نام و مجموعه جلسات هستند…
😍1,040👍544😭24❤11
شاید شما هم این روزها در جمع های دوستانه یا در خلوت ، این جمله رو زیاد تکرار میکنید : (امسال چه سال عجیبی بود ها ، سال ۱۴۰۵ خیلی عجیب و غریب بود ) و از این قبیل جملات... صادقانه باید بگم : بله کاملا درست میگید. سال ۱۴۰۵ هجری شمسی نه فقط برای ما بلکه برای کل زمین و حتی برای کل کیهان و منظومه های دیگر لحظات جدیدی رو رقم زد. به شخصه برای خود بنده ، سالی پر از اتفاقات عجیب ، رخدادهای غافلگیر کننده ، فراز و نشیب ها…
😍1,310👍668😭58
مهربانانم یک هفته ای ست درحال طراحی و ساخت پادکست مهمی هستم. امید است توجه به محتوای ژرف آن ، تمام گره های کور ذهن شما را باز کرده و دروازه جدیدی از زندگی را به روی قلبتان بگشاید. و روزنه های نور را در سینه تنگ و تاریک درونتان باز کند. به محض آماده شدن این پادکست آن را در کانال بارگذاری خواهم کرد💚
😍1,960👍659😭56❤3
الهی که مهر تو همواره بر محراب عشق من تابان باشد و من بتوانم عشق تو را در همه دل ها بیدار کنم آمین دوستتون دارم💚
😍1,350👍337😭118
هنگام نوشتن بیت اول ، حافظ در فراق است و هنگام نوشتن بیت آخر ناگهان وصل از راه میرسد و حافظ از خود بیرون میشود و به خود تبریک گفته و میگوید : حافظ شب هجران شد ، بوی خوش وصل آمد شادی ات مبارک باد ای عاشق شیدایی
😍939👍291😭106
با نگاهی عرفانی و عمیق به این ابیات نورانی جناب حافظ ژرف اندیشی کنید
😍736👍216😭75
ای درد تو هم درمان ، در بستر بیماری ای یاد تو هم مونس در گوشه ی تنهایی در دایره ی قسمت ، ما نقطه ی پرگاریم لطف آنچه تو اندیشی ، حکم آنچه تو فرمایی
😍807👍278😭75
Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @hadirasuli1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@hadirasuli1 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال رسمی هادی رسولی” (@hadirasuli1), 32,893 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hadirasuli1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.