Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for АЯТЫ И ХАДИСЫ

Channel

АЯТЫ И ХАДИСЫ

@hadisiayati

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,710subscribers

-85 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001469801303
TypeChannel
Username@hadisiayati
Created25 April 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hadisiayati

Growth

7,7107,7957,752.56 August 2026 — 7,795 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,795 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,792 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,783 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,775 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,760 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,749 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,736 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,729 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,725 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,710 subscribers6 August 20261 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 26 days, net -85. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,697–7,808 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 08:177,710-15
29 Aug 2026, 13:347,725-4
26 Aug 2026, 03:277,729-7
23 Aug 2026, 04:077,736-13
19 Aug 2026, 22:047,749-11
16 Aug 2026, 20:537,760-15
13 Aug 2026, 04:257,775-8
9 Aug 2026, 21:317,783-9
7 Aug 2026, 04:317,792-3
6 Aug 2026, 10:197,795no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:527,795first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.71%
avg views ÷ 7,710 subscribers
Avg views / post
286
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
9
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held25 (11 July 202616 August 2026)
Views total2,573
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 57s
Average length
1m 29s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC239 viewsread 28 August 2026

Личностный такфир и в чём разногласие Был спрошен шейх Абду ль-Азиз ар-Раджихи: هل يعذر بالجهل من يطوف بالقبر أو يفعل شيئاً من أعمال الشرك إذا كان يجهل أن ما يعمله شرك بالله عز وجل؟ «Оправдывается ли по невежеству тот, кто обходит могилу или совершает что-либо из действий ширка, если он не знал, что совершаемое им действие является приобщением Аллаху сотоварища? Ответ: الذين وقع فيهم ذلك قبل بعثة الرسول عليه الص

14 Aug 2026, 20:41 UTC230 viewsread 28 August 2026

ВИДИМ ЛИ МЫ МОГИЛУ ПРОРОКАﷺ И НАХОДИТСЯ ЛИ ОНА ПРЯМО В МЕЧЕТИ ??

13 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC282 viewsread 28 August 2026

Сказал Шейх Абдуль-Лятиф ибн Абдур-Рахман, отвечая Дауду ибн Джорджису, который опирался на некоторые слова Ибн аль-Кайима, сказал: ومن أنواع الشرك سجود المريد للشيخ . يفيد أن هذا رجوع إلى الشرك من حيث هو لا إلى الأصغر ، وكذلك سجود المريد للشيخ لا يُختلف في أنه من الشرك الأكبر ، كما نص عليه فقهاء المذاهب في باب الردة "И из видов ширка — земной поклон мюрида своему шейху". Это указывает на то, что такой поступок во

10 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC292 viewsread 28 August 2026

Сегодня какое нибудь из этих заблуждений присутствует в каждой секте и ещё больше и хуже этого ..

10 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC303 viewsread 28 August 2026

ПЯТЬ ГРУПП, ОТВЕРГШИХ АЛЛАХА 💬Сказал Яхья ибн Закария, да помилует его Аллах: «Я был у Суфьяна ибн ‘Уяйны (ум. 198 г.х.), да помилует его Аллах, и один человек сказал ему: “Мы нашли пять групп людей, которые вышли из Исляма и не уверовали. Сказал Суфьян: Кто же они? Он ответил: Джахмиты, кадариты, мурджииты, рафидиты и христиане. Суфьян спросил: Каким образом? Он сказал: 1⃣— Д Ж А Х М И Т Ы Сказал Всеблагой и

8 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC296 viewsread 28 August 2026

ОНИ ХУЖЕ СВИНЕЙ... Сказал известный таби’ин Абу аль-Джауза аль-Басри (ум. 82 г.х.), да помилует его Аллах: لأن أجالس الخنازير أحب إلي من أن أجالس أحداً من أهل الأهواء. «Сидеть со свиньями для меня предпочтительнее, чем сидеть с кем-либо из приверженцев страстей» [منجد الخطيب ، ١٦٤] ———- Свинья не испортит твою акыду и не посеет смуту в сердце,а те кто дружат, ходят, кушают, еще и на статусы выставляют нововведе

5 Aug 2026, 22:13 UTC332 viewsread 28 August 2026

Мазхаб аш'аритов исходит из мазхаба му'тазилитов, а мазхаб му'тазилитов исходит из мазхаба джахмитов. Они являются потомками. Аль-‘Алляма муфти шейх Салих аль-Фаузан ( да сохранит его Аллах )

5 Aug 2026, 22:13 UTC324 viewsread 28 August 2026

١٠ - حَدَّثَنِي أَحْمَدُ بْنُ سَعِيدٍ أَبُو جَعْفَرٍ الدَّارِمِيُّ، قَالَ:سَمِعْتُ أَبِي يَقُولُ: سَمِعْتُ خَارِجَةَ، يَقُولُ: " الْجَهْمِيَّةُ كُفَّارٌ بَلِّغُوا نِسَاءَهُمْ أَنَّهُنَّ طَوَالِقُ، وَأَنَّهُنَّ لَا يَحْلِلْنَ لِأَزْوَاجِهِنَّ لَا ⦗١٠٦⦘ تَعُودُوا مَرْضَاهُمْ وَلَا تَشْهَدُوا جَنَائِزَهُمْ، ثُمَّ تَلَا {طه} [طه: ١] {مَا أَنْزَلْنَا عَلَيْكَ الْقُرْآنَ لِتَشْقَى} [طه: ٢] إِلَى قَوْلِهِ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ {الر

2 Aug 2026, 19:54 UTC363 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Шейх Сулейман ибн Сахман аль Ханбали 1266-1349 г.х сказал: Что касается обмана и запутывания со стороны некоторых людей, которые утверждают, что шейх уль-Ислам (Ибн Таймия) воздерживался от такфира конкретному невежественному человеку, то это искажение и введение в заблуждение со стороны тех, кто слеп в понимании. Поскольку под этим подразумеваются конкретные вопросы, доказательства которых могут быть скрыты от нек

1 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC304 viewsread 28 August 2026

Сказали некоторые саляфы ; « все заблудшие секты являются хариджитами, потому что они вышли против ахлю сунна» ( и когда у них есть возможность и сила они выходят с мечом , а чаще зовут себе в помощь войска кафиров)

31 Jul 2026, 17:34 UTC306 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @dar_ujourPhoto

Наши новинки можно получить бесплатно: В магазине «Hikma» по адресам: г. Махачкала ул. Ахмад-Хаджи Кадырова 25 ул. Малыгина 41 Ул. Мусаева 10 В магазине «Magrib» в г. Дербент. В магазине «Sunna» в г. Хасавюрт, ул. Гамидова 191. В магазине «Anaasif» в г. Назрань. Список будет пополняться, Ин шаа Аллах.

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @hadisiayati. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ХАДИСЫ И АЯТЫ
@BookHadith · 34,439
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“АЯТЫ И ХАДИСЫ” (@hadisiayati), 7,710 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hadisiayati.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.