Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for رمزارزها با محمد حق وردی

Channel

رمزارزها با محمد حق وردی

@haghverdi_crypto

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,116subscribers

-25 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001282060965
TypeChannel
Username@haghverdi_crypto
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/haghverdi_crypto

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,1162,1432,129.56 August 2026 — 2,141 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,141 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,143 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,141 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,135 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,132 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,128 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,124 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,125 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,126 subscribers5 September 2026 — 2,124 subscribers11 September 2026 — 2,121 subscribers14 September 2026 — 2,117 subscribers18 September 2026 — 2,116 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 44 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,112–2,147 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 18:172,116-1
14 Sept 2026, 20:162,117-4
11 Sept 2026, 04:162,121-3
5 Sept 2026, 19:562,124-2
1 Sept 2026, 20:552,126+1
29 Aug 2026, 11:172,125+1
26 Aug 2026, 07:422,124-4
23 Aug 2026, 04:072,128-4
19 Aug 2026, 16:042,132-3
16 Aug 2026, 18:262,135-6
12 Aug 2026, 21:402,141-2
9 Aug 2026, 19:522,143+2
6 Aug 2026, 06:162,141no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:082,141first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 26 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 14:02 UTC≈1,280 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#روز_سوم بازدهی پلان ۱۴ روزه ترید ما تا اینجای کار 5.3 درصد می باشد📈 اگر احیانا علاقه مند به همراهی بودین و جاموندید برای تریدهای بعدی میتونید خودتونو برسونید . اکثر این سود رو بخاطر ریزش بازار تونستیم کسب کنیم در جهت خلاف روند و پوزیشن short ... @haghverdi_crypto ✅

26 Jul 2026, 14:11 UTC≈1,170 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

امروز تور ۱۴ روزه معاملات اهرمی رو استارت زدم با خرید ارز shiba ... لطفا بدون هماهنگی واریز نکنید ، پلان اهرمی استارت خورد ..‌. @haghverdi_crypto ✅

21 Jul 2026, 02:27 UTC≈1,540 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

عزیزان سلام ، پلان ۱۴ روزه رو از اول مرداد استارتش رو میزنم . در این پلان ۱۷ نفر شرکت کردند و احتمالا دو سه نفر هم تا اول مرداد خودشونو برسونن و بشه ۲۰ نفر . اکثرا با همون کف ۵۰۰ دلاری استارت زدند و بالاترین مبلغ مشارکتی ۱۰۰۰ تتر بود . دو نفر از مشتریان از خارج ایران شرکت کردند . اکثر سرمایه گذارا پول زحمت کشی و حقوقشون هست و این از نظر روانی منو مجاب کرد اول حفظ سرمایه ها اولویتم باشه سپس به کسب بازدهی فکر کنم با ای

16 Jul 2026, 14:07 UTC≈1,820 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

کدام ریسک برای شما منطقی تر است ؟

  1. اهرم 2x ( احتمال لیکوییدی اگر قیمت ۵۰ درصد خلاف روند شما برود)25%
  2. اهرم 3x (احتمال لیکوییدی اگر قیمت ۳۳ درصد خلاف روند شما برود )25%
  3. اهرم 5x ( احتمال لیکوییدی اگر قیمت ۲۰ درصد خلاف روند شما برود )34%
  4. اهرم 10x ( احتمال لیکوییدی اگر قیمت ۱۰ درصد خلاف روند شما برود )23%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

15 Jul 2026, 15:18 UTC≈1,370 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

به پیشنهاد یکی از مشتریان قدیمی ، پوشش زیان ۵۰ درصدی در پلان معاملات اهرمی لحاظ کردم🙏🌹 @haghverdi_crypto ✅

14 Jul 2026, 19:52 UTC≈1,390 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

پلان معاملات اهرمی ×۱۰ برابری ... تعدادی از دوستان که سرمایه کمی دارند یا علاقه به معاملات با ریسک بالا دارند تقاضا داشتند یک پلان برای این دسته از دوستان بذاریم . این پلان ۱۴ روزه رو به صورت آزمایشی برای اولین بار ارائه میدم اگر استقبال شد به مراتب بیشتر میذاریم . ۱- در این پلان همان طور که امکان چند برابر شدن سرمایه در مدت کوتاه وجود دارد ، امکان سوخت شدن سرمایه(لیکویید) نیز وجود دارد و فقط از افرادی که چند سال هست

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @haghverdi_crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Jul 2026, 14:07 UTCAnonymous Poll235 voters

کدام ریسک برای شما منطقی تر است ؟

  1. اهرم 2x ( احتمال لیکوییدی اگر قیمت ۵۰ درصد خلاف روند شما برود)25%
  2. اهرم 3x (احتمال لیکوییدی اگر قیمت ۳۳ درصد خلاف روند شما برود )25%
  3. اهرم 5x ( احتمال لیکوییدی اگر قیمت ۲۰ درصد خلاف روند شما برود )34%
  4. اهرم 10x ( احتمال لیکوییدی اگر قیمت ۱۰ درصد خلاف روند شما برود )23%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

کانال خبری فردا نیوز | اخبارفردا | جنگ مذاکرات توافق تحریم | پروکسی
@Farda_newsir · 27,016
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 11 September 2026
️گروه بین‌المللی عرشیان️
@Arshian_International_Group · 85,768
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“رمزارزها با محمد حق وردی” (@haghverdi_crypto), 2,116 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/haghverdi_crypto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.