#迷梦 频道链接:https://t.me/hahbj8/62356

Channel
北京【海奥华】反馈频道
@hahbeijing5
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
26,115subscribers
+2,147 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002101441048 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hahbeijing5 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hahbeijing5 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 26,115 | +149 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:01 | 25,966 | +135 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 25,831 | +56 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:14 | 25,775 | +158 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:56 | 25,617 | +239 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 20:38 | 25,378 | +94 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:54 | 25,284 | +76 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:35 | 25,208 | +63 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:59 | 25,145 | +58 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 25,087 | +37 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:06 | 25,050 | +46 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:07 | 25,004 | +39 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:37 | 24,965 | +77 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 24,888 | +80 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 24,808 | +90 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 24,718 | +116 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 24,602 | +82 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 24,520 | +66 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:07 | 24,454 | +31 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 24,423 | first reading |
Engagement
501 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.651%
- avg views ÷ 26,115 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 170
- 223 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 223
- of 501 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 501 (7 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 37,930 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 6s
- Average length
- 6s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
#蜜蜜 频道链接:https://t.me/hahbj8/62234
#鹿溪 频道链接:https://t.me/hahbj8/58953
#大冰糖 频道链接:https://t.me/hahbj8/61485
#星黛露 频道链接:https://t.me/hahbj8/64427
#小妮 频道链接:https://t.me/hahbj8/64643
#朱莉 频道链接:https://t.me/hahbj8/64219
#棒棒糖 频道链接:https://t.me/hahbj8/60593
#小元宝 频道链接:https://t.me/hahbj8/59487
#文夕 频道链接:https://t.me/hahbj8/63275
#咪妮 频道链接:https://t.me/hahbj8/59286
#暖宝宝 频道链接:https://t.me/hahbj8
Showing the 12 most recent of 501 posts we hold for @hahbeijing5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@qicherj · 13,12923 posts亚运村♦️星洛♥️个人
@lx678xl · 5808 posts是Guan管呀。北京
@Sndxggy · 5526 posts泡泡🫧
@babybaby1314 · 2385 posts冰糖
@bingbing_6 · 1,2625 posts北京龟男日记
@bjguinanriji · 1,0785 posts子萱
@nn_hhf7 · 7714 posts宥一一🌈
@tuantuanzai123 · 1,0794 posts呼叫北苑
@xjl2026 · 2264 posts小岛的朋友圈
@xiaoduo101 · 7203 posts帅喵反馈(复活版)
@nideyunuo9999 · 5,0332 posts舒淇的闺房
@shuqi666666 · 7822 posts小玲珑的家人
@uuuoo8765 · 3,2092 postsGood老师开课啦
@yizhixiaogougou233 · 4,8962 posts珠珠的私密空间
@zhuzhu20260101 · 6642 posts琪琪的🏠
@hhshdjdjjd · 1,5391 post晓晓专属频道
@kplxx0097 · 7941 post文文的后宫
@wenwenqaq123 · 6601 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@lotterynav · 174,17822 posts北京【海奥华】中小频道
@hahbj4 · 5,5561 post海奥华唯一管理: @bjhah
@hahbj888 · 1551 post小玖的频道
@jiu136386 · 6801 postLotteryBest精选推荐
@lotterybestnav · 148,0891 post亚运村♦️星洛♥️个人
@lx678xl · 5801 post雅丽🏘后花园
@shuqinhe56789 · 6931 post王可雨恋爱日记
@wangkeyuriji · 4071 post文文的后宫
@wenwenqaq123 · 6601 post小可宝宝的课表(新号)
@xiaoke999988 · 1,1841 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“北京【海奥华】反馈频道” (@hahbeijing5), 26,115 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hahbeijing5.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.