22 measurements spanning 23 days, net -2,874. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,991–22,727 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 06:07
19,422
-437
29 Aug 2026, 06:34
19,859
-130
28 Aug 2026, 09:04
19,989
-36
27 Aug 2026, 07:54
20,025
+206
26 Aug 2026, 08:12
19,819
-67
25 Aug 2026, 04:36
19,886
-64
24 Aug 2026, 04:54
19,950
-78
22 Aug 2026, 16:02
20,028
-217
21 Aug 2026, 09:37
20,245
-402
20 Aug 2026, 08:45
20,647
-549
19 Aug 2026, 11:08
21,196
-65
18 Aug 2026, 12:22
21,261
-98
17 Aug 2026, 11:08
21,359
-201
15 Aug 2026, 19:58
21,560
-106
14 Aug 2026, 09:36
21,666
-83
12 Aug 2026, 21:55
21,749
-110
11 Aug 2026, 23:22
21,859
-120
10 Aug 2026, 21:15
21,979
-87
9 Aug 2026, 20:21
22,066
-47
8 Aug 2026, 16:55
22,113
first reading
Engagement
50 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.20%
avg views ÷ 19,422 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,010
48 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
48
of 50 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held
50 (31 July 2026 – 29 August 2026)
Views total
48,499
Reactions total
857
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
30 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,110
Videos
≈257
Links
≈2,320
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
893 reactions across 50 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
330
37.0%
🔥
170
19.0%
🥰
114
12.8%
👏
66
7.39%
🐳
65
7.28%
👍
52
5.82%
👌
51
5.71%
🎉
29
3.25%
🫡
15
1.68%
💯
1
0.112%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 893reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
$TART backed by an experienced team.
TART is a highly‑utility project and I will closely follow & support it.
Now is the key time for $TART. I will keep updating its project progress.
Presale: Aug 29, 18:00 UTC
Official Launch: Aug 31, 19:00 UTC
http://tartswap.com/presale
👍 TG: https://t.me/TartSwap
🌐 Website: https://tartswap.com/
The $ PEPE project team is still working hard, it is the first project from https://manyu.fun. Experienced team.
Https://pepeinhiod.com x: x.com/pepeinhood telegram: @pepeinhood_rh
https://dexscreener.com/robinhiod/0x0d 389C0C2E7E1BEDB57FB7EB1331CD86067D85B0
Quick reminder on $MAME. Its tax will soon drop from 6% to 0. This is my favorite dev team. Hoping for another massive takeoff. 😘⚡️
https://x.com/mamebnb
$GTAVI started very smoothly, and the project team worked very hard.
https://dexscreener.com/solana/5btfjmmjyevet5g9rdtmjamm6wbpxws1nw79iztn9dq
https://x.com/GTAVI_Network
https://t.me/gemhaiwai/2239054
CZ Bull artist just made CZ version of 牛来 called 鹏来
https://x.com/hex_vanilla/status/2090469829396292049?s=20
0x468eea3dc021fd57748e9637d37b8528f5777777
🔶🔶🔶
Launch went smoothly, and pre-sale profits were good. 16X . Of course, do your own research.⚡️
0xE10833dE865Ec804E29499278457B3A620DC6666
https://alienonchain.com
https://t.me/Ailen_BNB
https://x.com/Alien_OnChain
🔶🔶🔶
The previous project achieved a market capitalization of 28M (a thousandfold increase). This time, it's a cryptocurrency-equity pool, a completely new project and gameplay.
Pre-sale links:
https://www.cheesepad.ai/sale/bsc/0xB40c2FCf5FA9FCAabfb4B5F20307c634fD3a6235
0xE10833dE865Ec804E29499278457B3A620DC6666
https://alienonchain.com
https://t.me/Ailen_BNB
https://x.com/Alien_OnChain
https://t.me/Alien_ch
🪶🪶🪶
$hoodcat 3X , ATH
0x1F380f6d3AeC3C2227dc3892062a31Aa45312390
https://www.nigelsussman.com/projects/robinhood-cats-palo-alto-murals
❤10🔥4🐳1
Signed gemhai 💎
Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @haiwaitgo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@haiwaitgo edited 10 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 610,424 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SING CALL 💎( gemhai )” (@haiwaitgo), 19,422 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/haiwaitgo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.