Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for HANBALI MEDIA

Channel

HANBALI MEDIA

@hanbali_media

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

682subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001380111717
TypeChannel
Username@hanbali_media
Created24 August 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hanbali_media

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6786866826 August 2026 — 681 subscribers6 August 2026 — 681 subscribers7 August 2026 — 682 subscribers15 August 2026 — 679 subscribers24 August 2026 — 678 subscribers30 August 2026 — 686 subscribers9 September 2026 — 683 subscribers18 September 2026 — 682 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 43 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 677–687 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 08:56682-1
9 Sept 2026, 01:38683-3
30 Aug 2026, 09:39686+8
24 Aug 2026, 02:28678-1
15 Aug 2026, 18:57679-3
7 Aug 2026, 07:00682+1
6 Aug 2026, 16:39681no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:32681first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

282 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍11440.4%
❤8530.1%
🔥6623.4%
🎉134.61%
🤔31.06%
✍10.355%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 282 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 August 2025 to 29 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jun 2026, 15:28 UTC≈5,130 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://youtu.be/_sON4QumMFM?is=tV_vu5wWUhVmOV7S

🔥4❤2

20 Apr 2026, 14:53 UTC≈5,600 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://youtu.be/8I64N6uLXNo?si=8ALzFLBRuP6ph483

❤9🔥5🎉2

25 Feb 2026, 13:52 UTC≈8,130 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://youtu.be/W1Uu_ByWoxk

👍10❤5🔥3🎉2

11 Dec 2025, 16:42 UTC≈6,570 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ОДИН МАЗХАБ НЕ ПРИЗНАЁТ ДРУГОЙ МАЗХАБ? - Шейх Ахмад аль-Ханбали

❤14🔥2

6 Dec 2025, 14:15 UTC≈5,720 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6o4tnx23jzY

❤7👍5🎉1🔥1

28 Nov 2025, 14:06 UTC≈6,950 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

В этом видео автор подробно разбирает фигуру шейха Али Джумаа: путь от критики салафитов и защиты четырех мазхабов до заявления о собственном иджтихаде и противоречия классическим позициям факихов. Автор призывает оценивать ученых по единым критериям, не обожествлять шейхов и не следовать за теми, кто ставит свое мнение выше четырех мазхабов, кем бы он ни был. https://youtu.be/iQjxjItJdcs

❤4👍4

31 Oct 2025, 16:49 UTC≈6,320 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Этот цикл лекций посвящён детальному разбору важной и зачастую неправильно понимаемой темы — таклида (следования мнению ученого) и мазхабов (правовых школ в исламе). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzMkSZ1DidQ

👍13🔥3🎉2❤1

20 Oct 2025, 14:54 UTC≈8,130 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Важные слова Имама ибн Бадрана аль-Ханбали о том, как правильно понимать тексты в которых встречаются сифаты Аллаха. Также разъяснение между акыдой ханбалитов и современных "салафитов". https://youtu.be/93TagzSFRRI

❤11👍6🎉1

18 Oct 2025, 17:01 UTC969 viewsread 6 August 2026

Добавили тайм коды к лекции для вашего удобства.

7 Oct 2025, 09:18 UTC≈1,110 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

У них было практическое знание, переданное от сподвижников и табиинов. Они знали, что достоверно, а что — нет. А между ними было единство — они понимали друг друга, им не нужно было говорить элементарные вещи. Все было ясно. Но мы, бедняги, — у нас только книги. А книги — это не есть знание. Именно поэтому Пророк, да благословит его Аллах и приветствует, сказал: «Воистину, Аллах не забирает знание, просто лишая его С…

👍13

28 Sept 2025, 15:23 UTC≈8,820 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Кто-то просит пояснить: как может быть, что действуют по слабому хадису, а не по достоверному? https://youtu.be/-ZXFFxO67TA

🔥9👍4🎉2

21 Sept 2025, 10:19 UTC≈2,220 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Шейх, можете разъяснить нам то, что дошло до нас через слабые цепочки передатчиков, и что до имамов могло дойти через достоверные цепочки? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlpbI7BzUw4

👍9❤4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hanbali_media. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“HANBALI MEDIA” (@hanbali_media), 682 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hanbali_media.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.