I always say this: If you can’t purchase something or simply don’t want to pay for it, at least watch the tutorials. You don’t have to start using everything right away. Learn, observe, and understand how things work. That way, when you eventually decide to start, you won’t have to start from zero and spend months learning what you could have already understood. For everyone who wants to start earning from the ver…

Channel
haηcɣsquad🎗️
@hancybox
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
68,266subscribers
-710 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001961238597 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hancybox |
| Description | Transforming brands with visual brilliance! ✨Seasoned editor with 400K Community. Mail : [email protected] |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hancybox |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:58 | 68,266 | -37 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:36 | 68,303 | -15 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:32 | 68,318 | -17 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 68,335 | -24 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 68,359 | -31 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:24 | 68,390 | -30 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 68,420 | -67 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 68,487 | -39 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 68,526 | -18 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 68,544 | -19 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 68,563 | -46 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:02 | 68,609 | -26 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 68,635 | -55 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:44 | 68,690 | -70 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 68,760 | -27 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 68,787 | -10 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 68,797 | -22 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 68,819 | -19 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:36 | 68,838 | -25 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:42 | 68,863 | first reading |
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.5%
- avg views ÷ 68,266 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 7,860
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (10 June 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 31,430 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 251
- Videos
- 81
- Links
- 249
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 2m 44s
- Average length
- 21s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
🔥 | Full Step-by-Step Workflow + 30S Continuous Shot | TopView Free Credits Must watch : https://www.instagram.com/reel/DcDP34pp2m-/?igsh=MTdkYXJqYW9uMHR5bw==
More info : https://www.instagram.com/reel/Dbvt96lvbci/?igsh=b2F2ZGU4bnk2NjRs
Seedance 2.5 Launched and Giving you 33 Days of Unlimited Access with Plan. The Golden Chance, Don't Miss! https://higgsfield.ai/s/seedance-2-5-launch-hancybox-dZrXcE
3-4 days of hard work and manual edit v/s A single prompt.🔥 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DbLPqMmpkDp/?igsh=MWRxM2FjY2tvNHg5Zg==
Download raw car clips for editing @cars_clips_edit
haηcɣsquad🎗️ pinned «The Biggest Problem solved for AI Creators | Save your AI Credits 🔥🔥🙌🏻 https://www.instagram.com/reel/Da2pOknJiNO/?igsh=MWl0YjhpdGswMDl1eQ==»
The Biggest Problem solved for AI Creators | Save your AI Credits 🔥🔥🙌🏻 https://www.instagram.com/reel/Da2pOknJiNO/?igsh=MWl0YjhpdGswMDl1eQ==
Capcut Pro ➡️ [Director version 2026]. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DasWDhSJvae/?igsh=MTJqYjhzMmo3aHZlOQ==
The Most Realistic Footage AI video I’ve created so far. 🤯 Made with ChatGPT + Seedance. Full breakdown is live 👇 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DaozeazJ-nX/?igsh=MTYxam96bHEzbnplNA==
The results are F*cking Awesome!! ⚡️🔥 and the cost is very cheap! Tutorial : https://www.instagram.com/reel/DaSxlftJQ0h/?igsh=cHZwaGw0dG41ODZi
This trend is currently taking the internet by storm! 🔥🔥 Create and upload your content to Go. It’s going viral fast! Here’s the link to the reel: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DaKOlNRpErM/?igsh=MWFuNWhqMTFrcDh5cw== To get the full PDF of prompts and step-by-step instructions, comment ‘Spiderman’ on the reel. :)
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @hancybox. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@hobo_edits · 47,464#1
@sarathdevaraj_capcut_editz · 11,199#2
@finallybadsha · 15,264#3
@DxoEdit · 13,757#4
@Kinemaster_material · 50,051#5
@letsgrow758 · 15,107#6
@editwithbk · 93,956#7
@mannalightmotion · 11,385#8
@trendyx_am · 13,369#9
@shahfaiz_editz · 58,944#10
@editinghublab · 6,555#11
@ExalVisual · 19,258#12
@irohiteditzofficial · 5,599#13
@cubechainmedia · 6,063#14
@azibam0 · 15,197#15
@stechzyt · 85,898#16
@xlr8edits · 6,720#17
@CuriousKamal · 1,400#18
@materialeditbymohit · 6,566#19
@rxlxslyrics · 3,300#20
@Dev2opYT · 11,102#21
@avernmsa · 11,016#22
@PrinnceFX · 4,345#23
@buildcreators · 15,214#24
@MREDITEX · 12,752#25
@haardikvisuals · 4,829#26
@capcut · 167,420#27
@aestheticxclip · 5,391#28
@shahir_edits · 25,299#29
@zoroeditz · 3,531#30
@editor_snap · 1,920#31
@QuickcutEditzx · 4,882#32
@visual_effects_pack · 29,939#33
@bdkeditbdk · 9,103#34
@h33music · 7,193#35
@ltsdead · 9,261#36
@theabhinit · 379#37
@waysuxs · 5,933#38
@secretedit01 · 4,883#39
@treditz23 · 4,315#40
@akshayedits0 · 10,225#41
@ash_visuals · 3,136#42
@foydalikanalgaxushkelibsz · 12,626#43
@Aesthetic521 · 7,264#44
@nemontazhh · 12,689#45
@jmefxyt · 1,433#46
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@stechzyt · 85,898
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 18 August 2026
@shahfaiz_editz · 58,944
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 22 August 2026
@asifomaryoutube2 · 95,290
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 16 August 2026
@Editday100 · 55,945
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 23 August 2026
@jayantabhai06 · 102,464
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 16 August 2026
@editwithbk · 93,956
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 16 August 2026
@capcuttemplatesfree · 162,645
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 16 August 2026
@CapCutTemplatesCom · 75,730
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 19 August 2026
@Rajaneditzofficial · 80,005
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 18 August 2026
@capcut · 167,420
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 16 August 2026
@createwithsid · 81,277
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“haηcɣsquad🎗️” (@hancybox), 68,266 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hancybox.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.