Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for المنهج الحنفي الماتريدي

Channel

المنهج الحنفي الماتريدي

@hanefimaturidi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

11,042subscribers

-128 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001337321555
TypeChannel
Username@hanefimaturidi
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hanefimaturidi

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,04211,17011,1067 August 2026 — 11,170 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,170 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,165 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,168 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,170 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,168 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,165 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,163 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,153 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,143 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,138 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,141 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,135 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,119 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,114 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,110 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,113 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,105 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,104 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,099 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,096 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,093 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,083 subscribers6 September 2026 — 11,076 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,062 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,052 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,048 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,042 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 42 days, net -128. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,023–11,189 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 21:5911,042-6
15 Sept 2026, 19:4011,048-4
14 Sept 2026, 05:2111,052-10
12 Sept 2026, 11:4211,062-14
6 Sept 2026, 21:5711,076-7
4 Sept 2026, 11:3511,083-10
3 Sept 2026, 02:1711,093-3
1 Sept 2026, 20:4611,096-3
31 Aug 2026, 20:4811,099-5
30 Aug 2026, 18:2711,104-1
28 Aug 2026, 21:1311,105-8
27 Aug 2026, 18:1311,113+3
26 Aug 2026, 20:5911,110-4
25 Aug 2026, 17:2811,114-5
24 Aug 2026, 20:3511,119-16
23 Aug 2026, 05:0411,135-6
19 Aug 2026, 14:4311,141+3
18 Aug 2026, 11:2611,138-5
17 Aug 2026, 14:2511,143-10
16 Aug 2026, 08:5411,153first reading

Engagement

50 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 50 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC467 viewsread 15 August 2026
Poll

كم صفحة تريد أن يكون متن التمهيدات في علم الاعتقاد (متن مختصر في المدخل إلى الكلام الماتريدي) تقريبا ؟

  1. 5021%
  2. 10019%
  3. 15015%
  4. 20045%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 09:39 UTC295 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

ما هو أهم كتب شروح الحديث لعلماء العثمانية من الناحية الكلامية؟

  1. تلفيقات المصابيح - قطب الدين الإزنيقي21%
  2. كشف المشارق - العطوفي7%
  3. نجاح القاري - يوسف أفندي زاده24%
  4. لوامع العقول - الكمشخانوي27%
  5. شرح الأربعين - البركوي21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC499 viewsread 10 August 2026

https://archive.org/details/Tahdhib-al-Dibajah-Sharh-Sunan-Ibn-Majah/Tahdhib-al-Dibajah-Sharh-Sunan-Ibn-Majah-Vol-01/

8 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC500 viewsread 10 August 2026

تهذيب الديباجة شرح سنن ابن ماجة المؤلف: المحدث الشيخ لطيف الرحمن البهراجي القاسمي الحنفي

8 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC230 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

هل أعجبتم بنظم الفرائد ومقدمته للإمام للسنبهلي؟

  1. نعم77%
  2. لا23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 22:10 UTC127 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

كيف؟

  1. جيد88%
  2. ليس يجيد12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 22:08 UTC135 viewsread 8 August 2026

مشروع متن التمهيدات في علم الاعتقاد وهو متن مختصر في المدخل إلى الكلام الماتريدي المصادر الأساسية لمسائل المتن; ١- المسائل الكلامية من المعلومات - الإمام داود القارصي ٢- باب الحدود من التمهيد - الإمام السالمي ٣- باب تقسيم العالم من صدق الكلام - الإمام الأندكاني ٤- كتاب اصول عقائد - المفتي عبيد الرحمن (باللغة الأردية) ٥- الأصول التي ذكرها شيخنا بلال درويش في مقالته/منشوره حول كتاب اصول عقائد (باللغة الأردية) ٦-أصول ح

7 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC102 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

هل تقسيم الأصول إلى أصول المعرفة، الأصول التي اتفق عليها المتكلمون، أصول المذهب، أصول فهم النصوص،أصول دفع الإلحاد، أصول دفع البدعة وما إلى ذلك حسن؟

  1. نعم82%
  2. لا18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Aug 2026, 23:19 UTC299 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

هل ترتيب المتن على قسمين( الأصول التي يبنى عليها العقيدة والكلام، المصطلحات) جيد؟

  1. نعم71%
  2. لا29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @hanefimaturidi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 11 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTCAnonymous Poll94 voters

كم صفحة تريد أن يكون متن التمهيدات في علم الاعتقاد (متن مختصر في المدخل إلى الكلام الماتريدي) تقريبا ؟

  1. 5021%
  2. 10019%
  3. 15015%
  4. 20045%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 09:39 UTCAnonymous Quiz82 voters

ما هو أهم كتب شروح الحديث لعلماء العثمانية من الناحية الكلامية؟

  1. تلفيقات المصابيح - قطب الدين الإزنيقي21%
  2. كشف المشارق - العطوفي7%
  3. نجاح القاري - يوسف أفندي زاده24%
  4. لوامع العقول - الكمشخانوي27%
  5. شرح الأربعين - البركوي21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTCAnonymous Poll35 voters

هل أعجبتم بنظم الفرائد ومقدمته للإمام للسنبهلي؟

  1. نعم77%
  2. لا23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 22:10 UTCAnonymous Poll26 voters

كيف؟

  1. جيد88%
  2. ليس يجيد12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTCAnonymous Poll17 voters

هل تقسيم الأصول إلى أصول المعرفة، الأصول التي اتفق عليها المتكلمون، أصول المذهب، أصول فهم النصوص،أصول دفع الإلحاد، أصول دفع البدعة وما إلى ذلك حسن؟

  1. نعم82%
  2. لا18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Aug 2026, 23:19 UTCAnonymous Poll49 voters

هل ترتيب المتن على قسمين( الأصول التي يبنى عليها العقيدة والكلام، المصطلحات) جيد؟

  1. نعم71%
  2. لا29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“المنهج الحنفي الماتريدي” (@hanefimaturidi), 11,042 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hanefimaturidi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.