Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Hannig.Recht

Channel

Hannig.Recht

@hannigrecht

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17,870subscribers

-64 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001166992379
TypeChannel
Username@hannigrecht
Created21 February 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hannigrecht

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

17,87017,96417,9176 August 2026 — 17,934 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,935 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,932 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,931 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,938 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,946 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,954 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,957 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,955 subscribers15 August 2026 — 17,951 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,959 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,964 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,962 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,959 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,954 subscribers23 August 2026 — 17,951 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,950 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,946 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,945 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,942 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,936 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,934 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,928 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,923 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,920 subscribers5 September 2026 — 17,910 subscribers9 September 2026 — 17,904 subscribers11 September 2026 — 17,895 subscribers13 September 2026 — 17,888 subscribers15 September 2026 — 17,880 subscribers16 September 2026 — 17,872 subscribers19 September 2026 — 17,870 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 44 days, net -64. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,856–17,978 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 14:1817,870-2
16 Sept 2026, 23:4017,872-8
15 Sept 2026, 02:0117,880-8
13 Sept 2026, 13:1817,888-7
11 Sept 2026, 20:3717,895-9
9 Sept 2026, 07:1617,904-6
5 Sept 2026, 22:0017,910-10
3 Sept 2026, 22:2117,920-3
2 Sept 2026, 12:3617,923-5
1 Sept 2026, 11:1417,928-6
31 Aug 2026, 12:0417,934-2
30 Aug 2026, 13:2317,936-6
27 Aug 2026, 13:5517,942-3
26 Aug 2026, 16:0817,945-1
25 Aug 2026, 16:2217,946-4
24 Aug 2026, 16:1717,950-1
23 Aug 2026, 03:4517,951-3
21 Aug 2026, 17:0717,954-5
20 Aug 2026, 13:4317,959-3
19 Aug 2026, 11:2717,962first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17m 09s
Average length
1m 43s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,494 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,96878.9%
🤯28911.6%
👏2329.30%
👎50.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,494 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC≈9,780 views150 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Hast du den BND auch bald in deinem Schlafzimmer? 🎙️👂🏻 Ein Kabinettsentwurf zur Reformierung der Nachrichtendienste (nein, nicht WhatsApp oder Telegram) könnte genau das bald möglich machen. Ausdrücklich erlaubt: ✅das heimliche Betreten der Wohnung zu Abhörzwecken ✅Manipulation von Informationen ✅Veränderung von Daten zum Zweck der Desinformation ✅Zugriff auf private Uberwachungs- und Handykameras ... die Liste is

👍95🤯46👏9

11 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC≈7,470 views84 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Noch ist der Himmel über Deutschland friedlich - aber das wird nicht so bleiben! Also sei vorbereitet! Nächstes Webinar "Kriegsdienstverweigerung" diesen Donnerstag, 19:00 Uhr ➡️ Hier anmelden: https://forms.gle/A1zKPTPUDwGd5ot38 Es gibt auch ein Skript und einen Musterantrag dazu 😎

👍83👏1

5 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC≈14,500 views116 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Der Staat bereitet also einen neuen Zivildienst vor - damit stellt sich zwangsläufig auch die nächste Frage: bleibt die "freiwillige" Wehrpflicht tatsächlich freiwillig – oder ist der gesellschaftlich anschlussfähige Zivildienst das Eintrittstor zum verpflichtenden Wehrdienst? Ein Blick in Artikel 12a GG lohnt sich 👀

👍114🤯2

3 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC≈13,200 views315 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

1000 Juristen fordern ein AfD-Verbot: klingt nach echt vielen klugen Köpfen oder? Rechnet man es runter, entspricht das gerade mal 0,24 % aller Juristen und ich vermute, das sind die, die das zweite Staatsexamen nicht geschafft haben 🤷🏻‍♂️😅 Lasst euch nicht Framen 😉

👍277👏30🤯8

29 Jul 2026, 14:16 UTC≈11,900 views106 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

300.000 junge Menschen wurden von der Bundeswehr angeschrieben und gerade mal 500 haben sich freiwillig zum Wehrdienst gemeldet. Wer das nur zum Lachen findet, erkennt den Ernst der Lage nicht! Denn aus dem "freiwilligen Wehrdienst" wird sehr bald der verpflichtende Dienst werden und dann ist es nicht mehr weit bis zum Dienst an der Waffe an der Front! Stell also jetzt deinen Antrag auf Anerkennung als Kriegsdienst

👍105👎1

28 Jul 2026, 15:04 UTC≈6,570 views30 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Wenn du auf Nummer sicher gehen willst, dann meld dich hier an: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdBX_YV2sU4tgp8EDzz9WxHaDXeNxKq9UlL43qVSO--nYSuQw/viewform ➡️Webinar "Wehrpflicht & Kriegsdienstverweigerung" ➡️ 30.07.26 - 19:00 Uhr ➡️ einmalig 49€ ➡️ bequem online teilnehmen Du hast am 30.07. keine Zeit? Kein Problem! 😎 Jeder Teilnehmer bekommt im Anschluss an das Webinar ein Skript mit Mustertext sowie die

👍30

27 Jul 2026, 10:19 UTC≈5,260 views22 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

So "trickreich" ist es nicht und bei mir kannst du lernen, wie es geht 😎 Wann? 28.07.26, 19:00 Uhr Wo? Online von überall teilnehmen Preis? einmalig 99€ ➡️ Hier anmelden: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSc553VhO_dGhX072p4_lIrgTrOxTdoBf__HddVrfW3utI_BDw/viewform

👍22

26 Jul 2026, 11:47 UTC≈6,100 views155 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍150🤯5

25 Jul 2026, 09:17 UTC≈6,310 views96 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Carsten Linnemann 2025 vs. Carsten Linnemann 2026 🤷🏻‍♂️

🤯79👏16👍1

24 Jul 2026, 08:54 UTC≈6,940 views107 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Ein Sinnbild für das Posten-Geschacher. Anstatt völlig neue Leute zu holen, wird der eine Low-Performer durch den anderen Low-Performer ersetzt. Und was haben sie eigentlich Linnemann versprochen, damit er das Amt des Gesundheitsministers annimmt?!🫣 Quelle: https://www.bild.de/politik/inland/bild-exklusiv-merz-wirft-verkehrsminister-patrick-schnieder-raus-6a62eca4efccf0c0d5537692

👍85🤯17👏5

19 Jul 2026, 11:59 UTC≈7,800 views28 reactionsread 3 September 2026

➡️DIE NÄCHSTEN TERMINE⬅️ 💶 23.07.26 | 19:00 Uhr Webinar "ENTEIGNUNG 2026 - Vermögen schützen und persönliche Sicherheit gewinnen" ⬇️ Hier anmelden : https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSc553VhO_dGhX072p4_lIrgTrOxTdoBf__HddVrfW3utI_BDw/viewform U N D 🕊️ 30.07.26 | 19:00 Uhr "Wehrpflicht & Kriegsdienstverweigerung" ⬇️ Hier anmelden: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdBX_YV2sU4tgp8EDzz9WxHaDXeNxKq9UlL43q

👍28

18 Jul 2026, 17:00 UTC≈86,800 views317 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Jens Spahn ist nach dem Leihmutter-Skandal zurückgetreten und (fast) alle freuen sich, sprechen von Gerechtigkeit und "endlich ist er weg". Pustekuchen! Dieser Rücktritt ist Opium fürs Volk und soll nur den Pöbel besänftigen. Aber zum Glück gibt es ja Social Media😉

👍270👏47

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hannigrecht. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Hannig.Recht” (@hannigrecht), 17,870 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hannigrecht.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.