7 measurements spanning 16 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,877–2,895 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Sept 2026, 17:28
2,891
-1
30 Aug 2026, 12:53
2,892
+1
27 Aug 2026, 11:33
2,891
-2
24 Aug 2026, 18:04
2,893
+2
21 Aug 2026, 05:07
2,891
+9
18 Aug 2026, 00:52
2,882
+3
17 Aug 2026, 13:15
2,879
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
28.6%
avg views ÷ 2,891 subscribers
Avg views / post
828
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held
20 (30 June 2026 – 16 August 2026)
Views total
828
Reactions total
25
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
17 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
733 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
282
38.5%
🔥
253
34.5%
🤣
77
10.5%
👍
55
7.50%
🎉
27
3.68%
😁
14
1.91%
👌
7
0.955%
👀
5
0.682%
👎
3
0.409%
🙏
3
0.409%
🤔
3
0.409%
🤩
3
0.409%
👏
1
0.136%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 733 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
بچه های استارکوچ زحمت کشیدن و یک هکاتون Vibe Coding دارن برگزار میکنن.
من هم در یکی از کارگاه ها به عنوان ارائه دهنده حضور دارم و قراره ۹۰ دقیقه ای رو باهم باشیم.
عنوان ارائه من این هست:
Coding Got Easy. Engineering Didn’t.
The Missing Layer in Vibe Coding
قراره توی یک رویداد آنلاین ۳ روزه چالش های واقعی شرکت ها رو اونجا به شکل عملی با استفاده از AI Coding Agent ها توسعه بدین.
جایزه تیم اول:
۳۰ میلیون تومان
تیم …
خب دیگه تقریبا رسیدیم به زمانه فیلم Her.
با این ابزار میتونین برای Chatgpt Voice خودتون یک کارکتر انیمیشنی بسازین و عملا با اون حرف بزنین.
نسخه جدید voice gpt رو هم اگر تست نکردین حتما تست کنین که شگفت زده میشین.
https://github.com/xikhar/persona
🔹داتین سومین دوره بوتکمپ رایگان «سفر فناورانه» را از اول تا یازدهم شهریور ۱۴۰۵ بهصورت حضوری در تهران برگزار میکند. ثبتنام این دوره تا ۱۵ مرداد ادامه دارد.
🔹در این بوتکمپ، ۷۰ نفر از دانشجویان و علاقهمندان حوزه فناوری پس از طی فرایند ارزیابی انتخاب میشوند و در برنامههایی مانند بازدید از شرکتهای فناوری، کارگاههای مهارتی، رویدادهای تخصصی و فعالیتهای گروهی شرکت خواهند کرد.
🔹دانشجویان رشتههای کامپیوتر، فناوری…
انواع این میم رو توی کامیونیتی دیدم.
برداشت خوبی که میتونین ازین عکس بکنین اینه که وقتی از کسی سوالی میپرسین که فکر میکنین جوابش رو بلده، باز هم بسنجین که فرد مقابلتون چه پیش زمینهها و سوگیریهایی داره و اینکه آیا برای شما صدق میکنه یا نه؟
@ever_code
در یک دنیای آزاد این شکلی رقابت.
از اونور کلاد دسترسی به مدل پرچمدار Fable رو تمدید کرد.
از اینور Codex گفت نه تنها فعلا لیمیت ۵ ساعته رو برمیدارم، بلکه یک ریست لیمیت هم زد رفتتت.
وقتی تعیین کننده میشه کاربر نهایی و بازار آزاد تصمیم میگیره.
نتیجه نهایی رقابت هم به نفع ما هست.
بریم یکم توکن بسوزونیم که عقبیم 😎🔥💻
بچه ها شنبه شب ساعت ۸ توی یوتوب لایو خواهیم داشت.
پرسش و پاسخ درباره آینده بازارکار و هوش مصنوعی
https://youtube.com/live/7v6TeTKTJpQ
روش بزنین که یادآوری بیاد براتون
اگر هم سوالی دارین اینجا کامنت بزارین که توی لایو در موردش حرف بزنیم
میبینمتون ✌️
🎉16❤6👍2
Signed Ashkan Rahmani
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @happydeveloper_tlg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Dr Ahmadian @drmjahmadian · 90,984 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
KhashayarTalks @khashayartalks · 77,665 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 August 2026
روانشناسی مردان - محمد راد @ravanemard · 56,518 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
ویکی تجربه - استخدام و بررسی شرکت ها @wiki_tajrobe · 83,468 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Happy Developer” (@happydeveloper_tlg), 2,891 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/happydeveloper_tlg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
