Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for the hard bits

Channel

the hard bits

@hardbits

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

961subscribers

+95 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002237421760
TypeChannel
Username@hardbits
Created23 July 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hardbits

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

866961913.57 August 2026 — 866 subscribers8 August 2026 — 866 subscribers22 August 2026 — 931 subscribers29 August 2026 — 936 subscribers9 September 2026 — 948 subscribers17 September 2026 — 961 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 41 days, net +95. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 852–975 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 23:16961+13
9 Sept 2026, 02:16948+12
29 Aug 2026, 22:16936+5
22 Aug 2026, 23:39931+65
8 Aug 2026, 01:17866no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:29866first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 23 July 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

82 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4554.9%
👍1012.2%
78.54%
🤔56.10%
🥰56.10%
❤‍🔥33.66%
👀22.44%
💩22.44%
🤓11.22%
🤡11.22%
🤮11.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2024 to 12 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Feb 2025, 07:48 UTC≈1,150 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📣 Open-call: Курс по основам AI Safety ИИ меняет мир с безумной скоростью, но вместе с этим несет в себе серьезные риски. Задача AI Safety – позаботиться, чтобы эти изменения были положительными Цель курса – дать базу для начала карьеры в AI Safety. Программа знакомит с основными концепциями, ландшафтом исследований и работами Anthropic, Redwood Research, MIRI 📖 Программа из двух треков: ➕Учебный (4 недели): Знак

🔥61🤮1

Signed Anton Zheltoukhov

6 Feb 2025, 21:31 UTC≈1,170 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Курс по теории обучения Gergely (ALTER) и Kōshin (Monastic Academy) Cartesian framework for learning theory, MDPs/POMDPs, Learnability, Sample complexity, Bandits, VC dimension, PAC learning Инфрабайесианство – надстройка над теорией вероятности, которая позволяет приблизить ее свойства к реальности, не теряя математического формализма. Основная цель – решить задачу agent foundations (на сегодня считается лучшей т

🔥2🤔2

Signed Iuliia Levin

31 Jan 2025, 13:19 UTC≈1,050 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Evals at METR. Философия и практика. Елена Еричева Запись доклада Лена – опытный исследователь машинного обучения с более чем 10-летним опытом в биотехнологиях и медтехе. В METR занимается AI Alignment и AI Safety: исследует возможности ИИ-моделей, разрабатывает бенчмарки и проводит Blue Teaming с фокусом на безопасности. Специализируется на компьютерном зрении, NLP и эффективном применении современных LLM и VLLM. А

🔥8👍2

Signed Anton Zheltoukhov

19 Jan 2025, 11:30 UTC≈1,990 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

AI Alignment Evals Hackathon 25 января – 2 февраля Оценка возможностей моделей сейчас в топе приоритетов сейфти и туда вливается много улисий: – Недавно прошла evals bounty программа от AISI с очень сочными призами для _всех_ чьи работы прошли отбор – Институт MIRI переключился на оценку evals'ов, чтобы помогать направлять усилия на самое важное – Большая часть фандинга идет на evals'ы – Было много другого. Это что

🔥5🤔1

Signed Anton Zheltoukhov

8 Jan 2025, 08:25 UTC≈6,640 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥4🤡1

Signed Anton Zheltoukhov

8 Jan 2025, 08:25 UTC≈6,930 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Конференция AI Safety Fundamentals Участники reading группы Agent Foundations и upskilling группы Runway расскажут о своих первых проектах в сейфти. Эксперты расскажут про текущий ландшафт исследований и как начать свой путь в сейфти. 📅 Когда: 10 января 18:50, 11 января 16:50 МСК 🌐 Где: онлайн, ссылка появится в чате "Минимизаторы скрепок" Подробности

🔥4

Signed Anton Zheltoukhov

2 Nov 2024, 10:50 UTC945 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Brief analysis of OP Technical AI Safety Funding Full data available here TL;DR I spent a few hours going through Open Philanthropy (OP)'s grant database. The main findings were: Open Philanthropy has made $28 million grants for Technical AI Safety (TAIS) in 2024 68% of these are focused on evaluations / benchmarking. The rest is split between interpretability, robustness, value alignment, forecasting, field build

🤔2👍1🔥1

Signed Anton Zheltoukhov

26 Oct 2024, 17:25 UTC≈2,020 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

We are pleased to announce that the 10th version of the AI Safety Camp is now entering the team member application phase! AI Safety Camp is a 3-month long online research program from January to April 2025, where participants form teams to work on pre-selected projects. We have a wide range of projects this year again, so check them out to see if you or someone you know might be interested in applying to join one o

🔥10❤‍🔥3

Signed Anton Zheltoukhov

24 Oct 2024, 16:40 UTC714 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

про фразочку Юдковского "бомбить дата центры" многие знают, но немногие знают, что есть бот Юдковский, чья единственная задача не продать вам compute 🙃. убедить его реально. удачи p.s.: если Ю уломать не получится, можно потренироваться на Гендальфе от Lakera AI

🥰5🔥31👍1

Signed Anton Zheltoukhov

22 Oct 2024, 21:48 UTC718 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://www.apolloresearch.ai/blog/an-opinionated-evals-reading-list

👀1👍1

Signed Iuliia Levin

22 Oct 2024, 21:42 UTC706 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

How to Solve It suggests the following steps when solving a mathematical problem: 1 First, you have to understand the problem.[2] 2 After understanding, make a plan.[3] - Devise a plan 3 Carry out the plan.[4] 4 Look back on your work.[5]-Review/extend How could it be better? If this technique fails, Pólya advises: "If you cannot solve the proposed problem, try to solve first some related problem. Could you imag

👀1🤓1

Signed Iuliia Levin

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @hardbits. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“the hard bits” (@hardbits), 961 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hardbits.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.