برایت آرزو میکنم که دوام بیاوری در روزگاری که شغل اول انسانها « زخم زدن » بر یکدیگر است...

Channel
حَرفِ ناب
@harfeenab
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,538subscribers
-327 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001352962520 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @harfeenab |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 51 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/harfeenab |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 11:05 | 10,538 | -3 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 08:07 | 10,541 | -3 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:06 | 10,544 | -3 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 09:35 | 10,547 | -6 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 12:06 | 10,553 | -5 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 10:30 | 10,558 | -3 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 08:50 | 10,561 | -2 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 05:58 | 10,563 | -3 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 08:20 | 10,566 | -5 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 06:27 | 10,571 | -3 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 04:07 | 10,574 | -6 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 05:39 | 10,580 | -1 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 03:46 | 10,581 | -4 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 02:46 | 10,585 | -3 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 01:51 | 10,588 | -3 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 03:17 | 10,591 | -2 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 23:46 | 10,593 | -1 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 18:47 | 10,594 | -3 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 20:56 | 10,597 | -2 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 22:06 | 10,599 | first reading |
Engagement
357 posts held, back to 14 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.498%
- avg views ÷ 10,538 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 52.5
- 91 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 91
- of 357 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 357 (14 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 4,773 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 08:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 32m 27s
- Average length
- 23s
Measured directly from 84 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 91 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
اگه واقعاً تریدری، لایو بازار رو از دست نده؛ ورود و خروجها همینجا مشخص میشن 👇 @cheragh
اونقدر...
حال...
حسرتش اصلا قشنگ نبود...
هیچکس ندید آن زنی را بعد از فروریختن تمام امیدهایش باز هم لباس هایش را تا کرد ظرف ها را شست و چای را دم کرد بعضی آدم ها ادامه نمیدهند... فقط یاد گرفته اند ویرانی شان را مرتب نگه دارند.
🚨🔥 جنگ سرخ و زرد دیدنیه! #پرسپولیس 🆚 #فجر_سپاسی 📅 ۱۵ آبان | ⌚️ ساعت ۱۶:۳۰ 🤣 یه بازی، هزار تا هیجان؛ آمادهی یه جدال نفسگیر باش! 🎁 بونوس ۳ برابری منتظرته! 💥 فقط در VOREXBET، هیجان رو چند برابر کن! 🌐 Telegram: https://t.me/+7vl7f16PMR42ZjJk 🌐 Site: Vorexbet.com
🚨 ورزشگاه آمادهی انفجاره! 🔹 🔴 #پرسپولیس 🆚 #فجر_سپاسی 🟡 📅 جمعه ۱۵ آبان ⏰ ساعت ۱۶:۳۰ a14 ⚔️ نبرد غیرت و قدرت؛ کدوم تیم برندهی این جدال میشه؟ 🎁 بونوس ویژه ۳ برابری رو از دست نده! 💥 هیجان رو با VOREXBET چند برابر کن! 🚀 👑 (vorexbet.com) 👑کانال بونوسهای رایگان:👇 https://t.me/+7vl7f16PMR42ZjJk 🌐پیشبینی از طریق ربات :💥 @VorexBet_bot
🚀 آماده پروازی متفاوتی؟! 🔥 چند ثانیه هیجان، اوج آدرنالین و لحظاتی نفسگیر! ✈️ بازی پرواز آویابت؛ هیجان در ارتفاعی متفاوت! 💙 آمادهای؟ مسئولانه بازی کن و از هیجان لذت ببر! 🌐 Telegram: https://t.me/+7vl7f16PMR42ZjJk 🖼️ Site: Vorexbet.com
🚀 آمادهای برای پرواز آدرنالین؟! 💣 بازی انفجار آویابت؛ جایی که هر لحظه پر از هیجان و غافلگیریه! ❤️🔥 تمرکز، هیجان و تصمیمگیری در چند ثانیه! A13 🏹 وارد بازی شو و مسئولانه بازی کن. VorexBet| هیجان در اوج! 🎤 (vorexbet.com) 👑کانال بونوسهای رایگان:👇 https://t.me/+7vl7f16PMR42ZjJk 🌐پیشبینی از طریق ربات :💥 @VorexBet_bot
شاید سکوت بیرحمانهترین حالت کنار کشیدن است...
🔥 امشب چشمها به این نبرد بزرگ دوخته شده! ⚽️💣 ⚫️ آلکمار یا قدرتنمایی یوونتوس؟ ⚪️ یه شب پرهیجان، یه رقابت تماشایی و کلی اتفاق غیرمنتظره! 👀 🎁 بونوس ۳ برابری رو از دست نده! 🚀 با پیشنهاد ویژه VOREXBET، هیجان رو به اوج برسون! 🌐 Telegram: https://t.me/+7vl7f16PMR42ZjJk 🌐 Site: Vorexbet.com
Showing the 12 most recent of 357 posts we hold for @harfeenab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@iran_tourismbank · 3,5894 postsموسسه نیکوکاری مهرآفرین پناه عصر
@mehrafarincharity · 3,9553 postsاجاره ویلا | جاباما
@jabama_com · 30,6182 postsتور لحظه آخری✈️نقد و اقساط
@lastsecoundtravel · 18,9412 postsMofting vpn | مفتینگ
@Mofting · 14,7561 postکلینیک سینوهه
@ORTHOPEDIC_sinohe · 42,3541 postBanimode | بانی مد
@banimodecom · 7,5131 postاقتصاد آنلاین
@eghtesadonline · 76,0491 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Ritzobet_ir · 39,59922 postsچراغ
@cheragh · 119,0674 postsبانک گردشگری | TOURISM BANK
@iran_tourismbank · 3,5894 postsموسسه نیکوکاری مهرآفرین پناه عصر
@mehrafarincharity · 3,9553 postsکانال
@clipstorya · 6442 postsکانال شرطبندی دربی کلاب
@derbybetm · 157,0492 postsاجاره ویلا | جاباما
@jabama_com · 30,6182 postsمل بت
@melbet_chaneel · 36,0212 postsتور لحظه آخری✈️02149773000☎️
@qasrtravelll · 161,3882 postsAli Pazani
@alipzns · 2,7471 postبانک ملی ایران
@bankmelli_ir · 43,2881 postبهخوان | Beh_khaan
@beh_khaan · 22,3581 postمرکز مشاوره تلفنی همکده📞
@hamkadehhh · 1,3051 postمدرک تحصیلی معتبر (با استعلام و بدون استعلام)
@madraktahsilimotabar2 · 2781 postMofting vpn | مفتینگ
@Mofting · 14,7561 postکلینیک سینوهه
@ORTHOPEDIC_sinohe · 42,3541 postLumiere Beauty | Original Cosmetics
@ShopLumiere · 2421 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@harfeenab named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ZhiwaChannel · 19,086
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 3 October 2026
@AhangeeNaab · 109,722
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 15 August 2026
@Pluss_Story · 32,641
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 3 September 2026
@hesseziba33 · 24,159
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 16 September 2026
@AfterYouMyLover · 56,462
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“حَرفِ ناب” (@harfeenab), 10,538 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/harfeenab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.