Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
31 measurements spanning 42 days, net -89. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,068–10,216 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 18:01
10,110
+1
16 Sept 2026, 06:57
10,109
+4
14 Sept 2026, 13:59
10,105
+2
13 Sept 2026, 02:59
10,103
-18
11 Sept 2026, 00:57
10,121
+1
8 Sept 2026, 02:00
10,120
-13
5 Sept 2026, 01:20
10,133
+48
1 Sept 2026, 03:44
10,085
-10
31 Aug 2026, 03:56
10,095
-7
30 Aug 2026, 02:18
10,102
-7
29 Aug 2026, 02:24
10,109
-17
28 Aug 2026, 04:02
10,126
-8
27 Aug 2026, 02:55
10,134
-7
26 Aug 2026, 00:29
10,141
-3
25 Aug 2026, 03:14
10,144
-10
23 Aug 2026, 19:28
10,154
-9
22 Aug 2026, 05:27
10,163
+1
20 Aug 2026, 23:14
10,162
+8
19 Aug 2026, 21:22
10,154
-12
18 Aug 2026, 18:03
10,166
first reading
Engagement
128 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.3%
avg views ÷ 10,110 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,350
46 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
46
of 128 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
128 (29 July 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
62,069
Reactions total
3,475
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 03:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
9m 27s
Average length
2m 22s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10,285 reactions across 127 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,196
40.8%
👍
1,632
15.9%
😭
1,625
15.8%
🤣
877
8.53%
👏
522
5.08%
💔
345
3.35%
🫡
271
2.63%
❤🔥
164
1.59%
🤝
159
1.55%
💯
82
0.797%
🥰
81
0.788%
🤬
69
0.671%
👎
61
0.593%
🤔
51
0.496%
🤷♀
51
0.496%
💘
44
0.428%
🕊
20
0.194%
🤷♂
10
0.097%
🤩
9
0.088%
😡
7
0.068%
4 further kinds
9
0.088%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 127 of the 128 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,285 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 128 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
الان دیدم تخفیف عید دارند روی محصولاتشون، دیدم حیفس استفاده نکنین
والا قبلا معرفی شون کردم
من مشتری ژامبون تنوری و سوییس آلمانی های خوشمزه شونم که تو وعده های صبحانه یا شام استفاده میکنم، این بار پیتزا هم امتحان کردم، دفعه بعد هم میخوام کباب مرغ بگیرم که خیلی کاربردیه
آنقدر قشنگ مرغ ها رو پاک میکنند که خود من آنقدر تمیز نمیتونم، بهشون اعتماد صد در صد دارم . پس از تخفیف عید استفاده کنین برای سفارش محصول
آدرس سایتشون…
هوا پز را روشن می نماییم
روی دمای ۲۰۰ درجه میگذاریم به مدت پنج دقیقه داغ بشه، تو این فاصله پیتزا مرغ تنوری سلام پروتئین رو از فریزر در میاریم، چهار تا یخ توی لیوان میندازیم، آب گاز دار و شربت سکنجبین هم با هم مخلوط میکنیم و پیتزا رو توی هواپز به مدت ۱۰ دقیقه میگذاریم و تا سفره رو بچینیم، پیتزا سالم و خوشمزه ما آماده شده 🥹
و عطر پنیر پیتزا اشتها تون رو باز میکنه 🤤
به نوبه خودم از طرف خانم ها تشکر میکنم بابت تولید…
در لفافه اشاره کنیم و بگذریم که اگر زنی با حجاب نیمه و آرایش، در کربلا و نجف و .. محتوایی ساخت، تمام پیج ها و صفحه ها شدند افشاگری از اون زن 🙂
اما حالا که توهین شد به ما زنان محجبه
شما محتوایی نمیبینین از همون آقایون 🙃
و البته هنوزم دیر نشده😊
کاش اقدامی کنند
ولی خب یه چیزایی از این تاخیر معلوم شد 😅
مث دم خروس و
قسم حضرت عباس
و مثل این نکته که شما نگران دین نبودید
شما دنبال محتوایی بودید که راحت ویو بگیره
و چه قلاب…
و منی که میدونم کلمه حجاب استایل رو ساختند برای متنفر کردن از حجاب
(و بعضی از روی عدم سواد تکرارش کردند و این شد یک برچسب منفی به ضرر کلمه حجاب )
و میدونم پشت پرده بعضی کلیپ های افشاگری از حجاب استایل ها رو
اما نمیشه اثباتش کنم 🤐
اما برای خواننده محترم که هر بار این مدل محتواها رو میبینی و هیجانی میشی و اون رو برای دیگران شیر میکنی، بدون که داری تیشه میزنی به ریشه حجاب 🙂
ولی مدتها بعد اثر سو این مساله آشکار میشه و …
#ارسالی
دلم میخواست یکی از آقایون جواب درستی رو به این آقا میداد حیف وصدحیف .
+ آقایون ؟!؟ نه عزیزم اشتباه نکن تا وقتی میشه درباره حجاب استایل ها محتوا ساخت و ویو گرفت تا وقتی میشه با زیر آب زنی و افشاگری و تهمت زدن به دیگران و درست کردن برچسب حجاب استایل بالا رفت، چرا باید چنین کاری کنند ؟! که نه توش ویو هست نه ممبر 😅
@hariradeli
هزار هزار زن محجبه کار آفرین نشون بدیم بهتون
هزار هزار دلیل و منطق و استدلال و
هزاران فرد که راهی که ازش حرف میزنید و رفته و پشیمون برگشته ...
ولی بازهم
افکار پوچ و مشوش شما اصلاح نخواهد شد
چون
یتحمل زنی شما رو بزرگ کرده که حسرتی گوشه نگاهش بوده و فکر کرده جای بچه داری و خانه داری، میتونست آرا بیرا کنه و فر بخوره تو خیابون و جوونی کنه...
به هرحال، بچه سر نهان والدینه ...
بگذریم
@hariradeli
📨 شما یک پیام جدید دارید:
به عنوان کسی که همه غلطی تو زندگیم کردم و بیحجاب هم بودم، از طرف من به اون آقا بگین هیچی نیس تهش هیچی...
الان صبح تا شب میگم چه غلطهایی بود من میکردم، اصلا ارزش داشت
الان که چادری ام هیچ حسرتی به هیشکی ندارم
راه رو رفتم تهش رسیدم به حجاب
اره شاید کسی نپسنده، ولی مهم نیس
به قول شما حسرت میبرم به اونی که میتونه زیاد سفر بره، به اونی که میتونه زیاد کار خیر انجام بده، به اونی که توانایی سالی چن…
ویلا رو تحویل دادیم🤝
بریم که پشت سرمون رو نگاه نکنیم هیچ وقت
راستی
چجوری غرب تهران زندگی میکردین موقع جنگ!؟
همش صدای هواپیما میاد
وقتی هم که سکوت میشد، صدای پمپ استخر 🤣
عالی بود 🎀
از دیشب هم کلی بهم پیام دادید و من رو دعوت کردید به ویلا هاتون، ممنونم از همگی...
من دوست ندارم مزاحم بشم.
یه تجربه کوتاه بود برای اینکه بدونیم نمیشه به هرجایی اعتماد کرد...
یه کلیپ دیدم چند روز پیش از یک نفر که میگفت : خانم های محجبه با…
چرا من شب پنجشنبه باید چنین خواب هچل هفتی ببینم ؟
اینکه برگشتم به دوران مدرسه و الان سر جلسه امتحان علومم، بعد هیچی یادم نبود و چرت و پرت نوشتم تو برگه
تا اینجا اتفاق خاصی نیفتاده، فوقش میرفتم بعدا دوباره امتحان میدادم ولی چرا کارت خوان آوردند سر جلسه ؟ و منم کارت کشیدم؟ مگه امتحان مدرسه پولی بود؟
اصن اینم هیچی...
چرا وقتی من برگشتم خونه، برگه امتحانی و کارت خوان تو کیف من بود ؟!!؟!
حالا چجوری اثبات میکردم از قصد بر…
#ارسالی
جاباما افتضاحه
ببین ما یه ویلا گرفتیم شمال، پول هم پیش دادیم، عکس ها عالی بود، رفتیم داخل، کثیف، پرده نداشت کلا، باورت میشه؟ بعد در و پیکر درست و حسابی نداشت، دیوار کوتاه، قشنگ مناسب دزد،
بعد حمام کثییییییف، بعد زنگ زدیم به صابخونه، گفتیم این مشکل داره، نمیخوایم، پولمون و بده،
ببین سه تا مرد گنده گنده اومدن، قشنگ مدل دعوا، همسر من اعتراض کرد و منتظر بودن دعوا کنن، دیدن همسر من گزک نمیده دستشون، گفتن باشه، یه …
💔64😭13❤3🤷♀3🤬1
Signed ادمین
Showing the 12 most recent of 128 posts we hold for @hariradeli. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@hariradeli edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
29 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
روابط عاطفی با ساناز شفیعی @sanaz_shafieiii · 124,969 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026
نشر میلکان | Milkan @nashremilkan · 30,919 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
يك حامد عسكری معمولی @hamedaskary · 22,548 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“حریر عادلی ☫” (@hariradeli), 10,110 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hariradeli.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
