Gambling & betting โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
51 measurements spanning 81 days, net -3,582. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โno change observedโ, never โinterpolatedโ. The vertical axis spans 47,594โ52,250 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 51
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 10:01
48,131
-29
5 Nov 2026, 11:19
48,160
-49
4 Nov 2026, 13:29
48,209
-47
3 Nov 2026, 15:38
48,256
-64
2 Nov 2026, 12:01
48,320
-21
1 Nov 2026, 08:36
48,341
-66
31 Oct 2026, 11:20
48,407
-53
30 Oct 2026, 10:46
48,460
-27
29 Oct 2026, 09:16
48,487
-58
28 Oct 2026, 05:20
48,545
-44
27 Oct 2026, 07:59
48,589
-38
26 Oct 2026, 05:10
48,627
-49
25 Oct 2026, 07:59
48,676
-53
24 Oct 2026, 05:57
48,729
-60
23 Oct 2026, 02:29
48,789
-39
22 Oct 2026, 03:15
48,828
-77
20 Oct 2026, 23:19
48,905
-48
19 Oct 2026, 19:47
48,953
-31
18 Oct 2026, 20:48
48,984
-43
17 Oct 2026, 17:17
49,027
first reading
Engagement
815 posts held, back to 15 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 164 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR ยท 30 days
1.88%
avg views รท 48,131 subscribers
Avg views / post
904
258 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.70%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
261
of 815 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 257 of 258 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
815 (15 August 2026 โ 6 November 2026)
Views total
233,224
Reactions total
3,964
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 14:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
โ1,410
Videos
โ11,600
Links
โ1,770
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 6 November 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 34m
Average length
25s
Measured directly from 371 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
Reaction mix
12,571 reactions across 810 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
โค
10,523
83.7%
โคโ๐ฅ
538
4.28%
๐ข
519
4.13%
๐
484
3.85%
๐
432
3.44%
๐ฅฐ
67
0.533%
๐
6
0.048%
๐
2
0.016%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 810 of the 815 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 12,571 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 815 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 812 we hold a reading for ยท 0.4%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ bought with money โ on a post by @harumyanmar. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 815 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegramโs own โeditedโ marker: 1 of 261 posts held from the last 30 days (0.383%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before โ this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Showing the 12 most recent of 815 posts we hold for @harumyanmar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @harumyanmar as deleted โ posts this register held that were missing from the channelโs public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channelโs public page, and when โ not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
29 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
24 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
4
handles named in this channelโs posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
2
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@harumyanmar named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant โ a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@calista_market2 named in 2 posts, 27 September 2026 โ 28 September 2026 ยท confirmed gone 10 October 2026 (two independent sightings โ see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@sukiverseresell named in 1 post, 26 August 2026 โ 26 August 2026 ยท confirmed gone 3 November 2026 (two independent sightings โ see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel โ we have no record it ever was one.
@calista_legit named in 1 post, 7 October 2026 โ 7 October 2026
@stargrammm named in 1 post, 4 October 2026 โ 4 October 2026
Appears in Telegramโs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
แ แฎแแฎโแแฑแธแแฑแธแแแบ @cvyepaymel ยท 119,170 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 28 here โ alongside 27 others โ read 20 August 2026
K Lovers Myanmar(Series) @KLoversMyanmarSeries ยท 203,019 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 16 here โ alongside 15 others โ read 20 August 2026
kdramaheaven220 @HappyVerse001 ยท 2,056 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 24 here โ alongside 23 others โ read 20 August 2026
Poems you should read before you die @AungCheim ยท 91,823 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 39 here โ alongside 38 others โ read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 โ this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐๐๐ง๐ช ๐๐ช๐ง๐ค & ๐๐ถ๐ณ๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ถ๐๐ต ๐บ๐๐๐ถ๐ฐโ (@harumyanmar), 48,131 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/harumyanmar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.