^ https://www.binance.us/spot-trade/gram_usdt всё клубнично, за ~2 часа волюма почти $8 🤙 дальше-больше, мтонга ❤️
👍5

Channel
@hblok
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
244subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001900471840 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hblok |
| Created | 17 March 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hblok |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 244 | +2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 242 | +2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 240 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:50 | 238 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:13 | 238 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
136 reactions across 19 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 125 | 91.9% | |
| 👎 | 11 | 8.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 136 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hblok. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 May 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
^ https://www.binance.us/spot-trade/gram_usdt всё клубнично, за ~2 часа волюма почти $8 🤙 дальше-больше, мтонга ❤️
👍5
https://t.me/tonmonitoring/2267 как же трясет, от того что завтра америкосы наконец-то смогут скупать $GRAM на миллионы долларов ❤️ на коинбейс $TON их категорически не устраивает 🤔
👍5
Несколько дней назад по чатам гулял бот с верифом - @tgmfabot. По описанию, кажется, что это именно тот самый бот, который будет использоваться для анонсированного нативного тон-коша для тг 🔍 Меня позабавило, что если пройти на fragment.com, там есть юзернейм - @tgmfa, у которого можно стартануть на аукцион со 115 $GRAM. Юзернейм не занят, значит по логике он принадлежит Telegram. Зачем они присвоили офф боту длинны…
👍3
❤️
👍6
А что если один из шагов MTONGA будет переход на дефляционную модель? 🏥 За время существования блокчейна напечатано больше 10% от стартового максимально саплая, а как мы уже знаем, с мая скорость печати была увеличена кратно. Кому это понравится? Только валидаторам в краткосрочной перспективе. Если конечно $GRAM не станет массово востребованным и необходимым повсеместно, чего никогда не будет, иллюзий тут строить не…
👍4
Кажется, что ускорили не сеть, а печать новых $GRAM 😁 mtonga!!11 ❤️
👍3
Уже пару-тройку месяцев с некой цикликличностью появляется ощущение бычки на TON: торговые объёмы то появляются, то так же резко пропадают. Обычно это связано с постами Дуриковича, но не всегда 🔍 Хочу отметить, что реальная бычка, по моему мнению, будет, когда цена $DUST и/или $STON приблизиться к отметке $3. Это будет означать, что китята разглядели технологию TON и тарят токены с фундаменталом ⌨️ Почему и/или? 🤔 …
👍13
«Нигеры полностью обнуляют свой портфель и превращаются в философов»
👍3
Какой-то «пельмень» хайпанул на днях с «расследованием» отмыва бабок через фиктивные разработки RSquad. По сути, просто собрав в один пост хронологию событий и подсчитав минимальный масштаб освоенных средств. Но это ладно, для ньюфагов полезная инфа, а для старичков добротный лолкек 😁 Сегодня же, каждый новостной канал был обязан осветить новое «расследование» по поводу кошелька TON Reserve. Я могу быть не прав, но …
👍8👎5
Быстрее бы уже MTONGA и $GRAM по цене чебурека с мясом, сыром и грибами(310₽), надоело читать высеры подарочных дегенератов 🤭 У меня конечно же есть мнение по этому всему, я поддерживаю Мистера Фримана - этот человек билдит в TON третий год подряд, нонстопом, и каждый раз ему вставляют палки в колёса, но он не останавливается. Мне понадобиться несколько минут, чтобы вспомнить все проекты/продукты/инструменты, которы…
👍7
^ я кстати ошибся, разлок ещё только предстоит - https://dropstab.com/coins/tac/vesting 15 июля разблокируется 100m $TAC, похоже веселье только начинается 🙈 https://t.me/TACbuild1/32 - сами TAC объяснили обвал манипуляцией третьей стороной, пообещали исправить рыночную механику и предоставить больше ликвидности. 🤔 Я поверил 😁
👍4
$TAC Токен, никому ненужного блокчейна/моста, вчера нарисовал -90% на графике буквально за несколько минут. Это привычный движ для мемкоенов, но никак для утилити-токена, используемого для газа, причём без инфоповода. Даже информация о недавнем взломе протокола не вызывало такой реакции на цену 😁 Если посмотреть, на график полностью, то видно, что укатывался пресейлерами, а потом и вовсе был в плато, так как никому…
👍7👎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hblok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@hblok named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“hamster blok” (@hblok), 244 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hblok.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.