为啥发🤮的表情包,这个文件肯定是不能用来吃的呀,只能在设备上使用,你不吐谁吐
💩14🤡2

Channel
@hdg669
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,410subscribers
+947 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1004492064081 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hdg669 |
| Created | 9 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hdg669 |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 1,410 | +1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 02:22 | 1,409 | -19 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 1,428 | -6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:45 | 1,434 | -6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 1,440 | -18 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 1,458 | -11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:53 | 1,469 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:38 | 1,468 | -13 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 1,481 | +829 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 652 | +189 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:30 | 463 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:19 | 463 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
145 reactions across 7 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤮 | 52 | 35.9% | |
| 👍 | 31 | 21.4% | |
| ❤ | 20 | 13.8% | |
| 🤣 | 17 | 11.7% | |
| 💩 | 15 | 10.3% | |
| 🤬 | 4 | 2.76% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 1.38% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 1.38% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.38% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 145 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
为啥发🤮的表情包,这个文件肯定是不能用来吃的呀,只能在设备上使用,你不吐谁吐
💩14🤡2
市面上的内透没有物质和人数显示是不是很难受呀,频道破500人公益内透➕物质➕人数🧐
👍19🤮12❤3💩1
最近三角洲内透项目挺火呀,给你们公益一款内透玩吧 使用教程:进apk里下载shizuku,给上root权限授权好应用,登录前加载界面开启,进大厅后在设置里登陆卡密 公益卡密:@hdg669 官方公益频道:@hdg669
🤮19❤5
三角洲行动海盗狗模拟解密内核 模拟解密不拉30天/10年(解决协议) 5/6系内核可用 无延迟 陀螺仪自瞄 【技术优势】 纯解密不动内存 · 稳定MAX 绘制不闪框 · 流畅无卡顿 纯算模拟算法解密 非内存 拦截 认准公益频道:@hdg669 反馈联系双向:@hdg666bot
🤮21❤8
Video, posted without a caption
🤣15❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
👍6❤2👎2
初来乍到,以后专门做公益项目出来,例如破解 自研项目 模块等等公益,希望得到大家的支持,认准海盗狗官方频道:@hdg669
👍6🤬4🤣2🥰2
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @hdg669. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“海盗狗官方(三角洲)” (@hdg669), 1,410 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hdg669.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.