Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Huidu.io Scam Alert ⚠️

Channel

Huidu.io Scam Alert ⚠️

@hdscammer

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,554subscribers

-507 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001425870658
TypeChannel
Username@hdscammer
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hdscammer

Growth

9,55410,0619,807.57 August 2026 — 10,061 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,044 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,015 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,975 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,901 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,884 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,847 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,833 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,799 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,770 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,683 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,600 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,554 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 33 days, net -507. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,478–10,137 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 10:209,554-46
3 Sept 2026, 16:209,600-83
31 Aug 2026, 04:339,683-87
28 Aug 2026, 05:179,770-29
25 Aug 2026, 12:489,799-34
22 Aug 2026, 13:429,833-14
19 Aug 2026, 11:289,847-37
16 Aug 2026, 19:039,884-17
13 Aug 2026, 07:269,901-74
10 Aug 2026, 02:269,975-40
9 Aug 2026, 01:4010,015-29
8 Aug 2026, 00:1610,044-17
7 Aug 2026, 06:4610,061first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 21 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.87%
avg views ÷ 9,554 subscribers
Avg views / post
274
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held8 (21 June 202627 August 2026)
Views total823
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 05:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
25s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 05:56 UTC214 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#Scam 🚨 [SCAM ALERT] New scammer reported User handle: @usdt66999999 , @ipttttt group [ @abcinrtousdt ] Identity: inr usdt exchange scam Amount Involved (USDT / INR): 148.5usdt Scammer UPI / Wallet Address: THe3TLvyd7QpkLuKYL1VXfNB42UwfQoo8K 📌 Incident Summary: funds sending and run, asking big order try to scam more ⚠️Please be extremely cautious of anyone who sends funds before the transaction details, exc

25 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTC308 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#Scam 🚨 [SCAM ALERT] New scammer reported User handle: @Parbhu67 @USDTjiejie Identity: inr usdt exchange scam Amount Involved (USDT / INR): 41088inr Scammer UPI / Wallet Address: 7P916K8005@mairtel 📌 Incident Summary: I TRUSTED HIM AND PAID INR but after few minutes he deleted chat and blocked me i have proofs so i am posting it if someone find any thing about him please let me know @Nottillnow if someone ca

24 Aug 2026, 03:48 UTC301 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#Scam 🚨 [SCAM ALERT] New scammer reported User handle: @ACEPAYGir1 Identity: prepay scam Amount Involved (USDT / INR): 505USDT Scammer UPI / Wallet Address: 0x25481E6Df8fd302E6611759bdEE4363Bab450534 📌 Incident Summary: usdt exchange to fund hacker and mix fund he take usdt and blocked me ⚠️Please be extremely cautious of anyone who sends funds before the transaction details, exchange rate, and payment terms

10 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC562 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#Scam 🚨 [SCAM ALERT] New scammer reported User handle: @lakshay4192 @Rocky00115 @nrpay888 @Mufasa159 Identity: N R PAY TECHNOLOGY BHOPAL (OPC) PRIVATE LIMITED Website: https://nrpay.co.in/ Laksya WhatsApp: +97152803 4192 Amount Involved (USDT / INR): 5 Lakh (5000 USDT) Scammer UPI / Wallet Address: nrpaytechnology355746.aps@sbi rausiaxpriva359542.aps@sbi rausiaxpriv359542.apy@kotakpay 📌 Incident Summary: We ar

7 Jul 2026, 09:06 UTC≈1,010 viewsread 26 August 2026
Photo

#Scam 🚨 [SCAM ALERT] New scammer reported User handle: @matias6aga Identity: data selling scam Amount Involved (USDT / INR): 600usdt Scammer UPI / Wallet Address: TBW2cnedgFcvTXtK138jywC3bdoSStBKno 📌 Incident Summary: TOOK payment and after sending hash, deleted and blocked me. suppose to send over 10k database of contacts ⚠️ Please be extremely cautious of anyone who sends funds before the transaction detai

26 Jun 2026, 05:45 UTC≈2,830 viewsread 26 August 2026
Photo

#Scam 🚨 [SCAM ALERT] New scammer reported User handle: @LucidPay_Kenzai -He is main fraud who cheated on me @LucidPay_Garry @LucidPay_Spencer - New Username : @Spencer_0138 @LucidPay_Anny - New Username : @Anny_3892 Identity: inr usdt exchange scam Amount Involved (USDT / INR): 5000u Scammer UPI / Wallet Address: 📌 Incident Summary: Promised me that they we will send Gaming Fund in exchange of USDT but After

22 Jun 2026, 05:29 UTC≈4,670 viewsread 23 August 2026
Photo

#Scam 🚨 [SCAM ALERT] New scammer reported User handle: @GOPAY88888 @gopay918 Identity: deposit scam Amount Involved (USDT / INR): 4000u Scammer UPI / Wallet Address: TPKSb2oqSTKERYf9SruaEadPNTNoKf4Xcu 📌 Incident Summary: Long time business with Gopay,but they cheat with me and my friend circle, lots of usdt cheated by us My friend lose almost 11000 usdt and i lose 4000usdt.. He offer me added my wallets but n

21 Jun 2026, 07:10 UTC≈2,500 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#Scam 🚨 [SCAM ALERT] New scammer reported User handle: @HKPAYaXin @KOOLPAY_Ling @KOOLPAY_XY @koolpayddd @KOOLPAY666 @KOOLPAYxiaoyu @KOOLPAYxiaoyu @KOOLPAYss @koolpayqingyan338 @koolpayqingyan338 @KOOLPAYahao1 @ZQpay0001 @ZQpay0002 @ZQPAY0005 @ZQPAY0003 Identity: deposit scam Amount Involved (USDT / INR): 4500u Scammer UPI / Wallet Address: TK9hydHABp9MCPEibLujSjijr3RfvtoA5M 📌 Incident Summary: The victim report

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @hdscammer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Huidu.io Scam Alert ⚠️” (@hdscammer), 9,554 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hdscammer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.