Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝑨𝒃𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒕𝒉𝒆📿

Channel

𝑨𝒃𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒕𝒉𝒆📿

@hel_in_hell

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

24subscribers

+23 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003921941591
TypeChannel
Usernames@hel_in_hell @madebymosi
Created9 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded19 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/hel_in_hell

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Previous handles

@hel_in_hell was previously reachable at these 6 handles, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@smysly_rf_tg_1910
held 20 October 2026 – 20 October 2026
@darlen_av
held 27 September 2026 – 27 September 2026
@x0717l
held 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
@mercury_257
held 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
@taturav
held 25 August 2026 – 25 August 2026
@lyumila_nvkz
held 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026

Growth

1472419 August 2026 — 1 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1 subscribers27 September 2026 — 38 subscribers27 September 2026 — 38 subscribers4 October 2026 — 3 subscribers14 October 2026 — 17 subscribers20 October 2026 — 44 subscribers20 October 2026 — 44 subscribers20 October 2026 — 47 subscribers21 October 2026 — 20 subscribers29 October 2026 — 46 subscribers29 October 2026 — 24 subscribers19 August 202629 October 2026
17 measurements spanning 71 days, net +23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Oct 2026, 09:2024-22
29 Oct 2026, 02:2246+26
21 Oct 2026, 19:0820-27
20 Oct 2026, 21:4147+3
20 Oct 2026, 05:2244no change
20 Oct 2026, 04:4744+27
14 Oct 2026, 01:0717+14
4 Oct 2026, 11:593-35
27 Sept 2026, 17:2238no change
27 Sept 2026, 16:4738+37
27 Aug 2026, 18:451no change
27 Aug 2026, 00:301no change
27 Aug 2026, 00:151no change
25 Aug 2026, 13:451no change
20 Aug 2026, 08:301no change
19 Aug 2026, 22:121no change
19 Aug 2026, 21:001first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
675.0%
avg views ÷ 24 subscribers
Avg views / post
162
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 October 2026
Posts held7 (9 August 2026 – 16 October 2026)
Views total324
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Oct 2026, 02:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

16 Oct 2026, 18:23 UTC135 viewsread 29 October 2026

Еще я часто бываю на этом фембой-канальчике и пощу себя там https://t.me/+FNRr9Iq6g_xkNWM0

11 Oct 2026, 11:16 UTC189 viewsread 29 October 2026
Photo

Всем привет) В этом канале буду с вами общаться. Тут будут мои фоточки, может буду рассказывать что-то из жизни. Попозже собираюсь начать стримить на твиче, буду разные игры проходить(может даже с вебкой).

9 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC428 viewsread 27 September 2026

Основной канал тут https://t.me/+sJyikV2AjWhkNzAy

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @hel_in_hell. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝑨𝒃𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒕𝒉𝒆📿” (@hel_in_hell), 24 subscribers as measured 29 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hel_in_hell.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.