https://opencode.ai/go?ref=BBD993NC55 推荐 已经用这个撸了好几个项目了
❤1

Channel
@helium_official
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,503subscribers
-124 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001679174071 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @helium_official |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/helium_official |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:15 | 6,503 | -15 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:57 | 6,518 | -17 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 02:55 | 6,535 | -19 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:42 | 6,554 | -11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 6,565 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 6,567 | -11 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:28 | 6,578 | -18 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 02:42 | 6,596 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:19 | 6,600 | -12 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:05 | 6,612 | -8 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:28 | 6,620 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:30 | 6,627 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:19 | 6,627 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 10 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
97 reactions across 9 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 50 | 51.5% | |
| 🤡 | 16 | 16.5% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 8.25% | |
| 👎 | 6 | 6.19% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 4.12% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 3.09% | |
| 🤨 | 3 | 3.09% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 2.06% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 2.06% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 1.03% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.03% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://opencode.ai/go?ref=BBD993NC55 推荐 已经用这个撸了好几个项目了
❤1
通知:节点配置调整说明各位用户:近期由于部分客户端(如 v2RayN 等)已不再支持「允许不安全 / allowInsecure」选项(主要用于自签证书或 SNI 相关场景),为适配新版本客户端,我们将对部分节点配置进行优化调整。调整期间节点可能会出现短暂断网情况,请大家及时重新更新订阅,获取最新节点配置即可正常使用。给大家带来的不便,敬请谅解! 感谢理解与支持~
节点调整请大家更新订阅
香港上游路由器让偷了 大家 等会
🤣50🤡11💩2❤1🤯1
香港节点异常 正在紧急处理
觉得节点超时不能用的 更新到最新版www.clashverge.dev/install.html
👎1
anytls协议的节点速度异常 上游正在排查 大家可以用ss协议的节点 好了吧
大家不能用就换最新版本的软件啊 推荐clash verge. clash meta
🤨3👎2😭2❤1
由于防火墙阻断 配置更换SNI域名 请大家更新订阅 获取最新节点 防止失联
👎3🤔2
可以了 比之前快多了
🤡5❤1🎉1
3.7G 有点大 还在压缩
🔥4🤔1
优化一下网站 稍等30分钟
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @helium_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
请问你当地什么协议可以用
The shares total 188%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HENET官方通知” (@helium_official), 6,503 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/helium_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.